Article published in:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp. 121142
Allport, G., & Postman, L.
(1947) The psychology of rumor. New York: Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Asch, S. E.
(1948) The doctrine of suggestion, prestige, and imitation in social psychology. Psychological Review, 551, 250–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A.
(1965) Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 589–595. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Masicampo, E. J.
(2010) Conscious thought is for facilitating social and cultural interactions: How mental simulations serve the animal – culture interface. Psychological Review, 1171, 945–971. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bednarik, R. G.
(2008) The domestication of humans. Anthropologie, 461, 1–17.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
(2009) Adam’s tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Blackmore, S.
(1999) The meme machine. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bordia, P., & DiFonzo, N.
(2004) Problem solving in social interactions on the internet: Rumor as social cognition. Social Psychology Quarterly, 671, 33–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Centola, D., & Baronchelli, A.
(2015) The spontaneous emergence of conventions: An experimental study of cultural evolution. PNAS February 17 2015, 112 (7) 1989–1994.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R.
(1976) The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C.
(1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
(2017) From bacteria to Bach and back: The evolution of minds. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Dorst, A. G., & Kaal, A. G.
(2012) Metaphor in discourse: Beyond the boundaries of MIP. In F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martinez, M. Sanchez-Garcia, & A. M. Piquer-Piriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture, and communication (pp. 51–68). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M.
(1996) Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
(2003) The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective. Annual Review of Anthropology, 321, 163–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Human evolution: A Pelican introduction. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Everett, D. L.
(2017) How language began: The story of humanity’s greatest invention. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Falkinger, J.
(2007) Attention economies. Journal of Economic Theory, 1331, 266–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, E., & Yang, Z.
(2015) Measuring emotional contagion in social media. PLoS ONE 10 (11): e0142390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, L.
(1954) A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 71, 117–140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D.
(Eds.) (2002) Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gould, M., Jamieson, P., & Romer, D.
(2003) Media contagion and suicide among the young. The American Behavioral Scientist, 461, 1269–1284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hovland, C. I.
(1951) Human learning and retention. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D.
(2013) Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.
(1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T.
(2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, p. 201320040. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T.
(1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 1041, 211–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, S.
(2004) La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moyer-Gusé, E.
(2008) Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment-education messages. Communication Theory, 181, 407–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T.
(1981) Attitudes and persuasion – Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.Google Scholar
Phillips, D.
(1980) Airplane accidents, murder, and the mass media: Towards a theory of imitation and suggestion. Social Forces, 581, 1001–1004. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, D. P., Lesyna, K., & Paight, D. J.
(1992) Suicide and the media. In R. W. Maris, A. L. Berman, J. T. Maltsberger, & R. I. Yufit (Eds.). Assessment and prediction of suicide (pp. 499–519). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D.
(2017a) A note about meta-metaphors: Considering the theoretical implications of terms used to discuss metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 7(2), 292–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017b) Story metaphors: Narratives and figurative language in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D., Feliciano, A., & Sparks, A.
(2018) Rhetorical confinement, contrasting metaphors, and cultural polarities: “Yes we can” meets “Carnage in the cities.” Metaphor and the Social World, 8(2), 247–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritt, N.
(2004) Selfish sounds and linguistic evolution: A Darwinian approach to language change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, E. M.
(2003) Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H.
(1971) Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communication, and the public interest (pp. 37–52). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D.
(1992) Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 5(4), 297–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weng, L., Flammini, A., Vespignani, A., & Menczer, F.
(2012) Competition among memes in a world with limited attention. Scientific Reports, 21, Article number: 335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar