Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.141–168

A multifactorial analysis of metaphors in political discourse

Gendered influence in Hong Kong political speeches

| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
The rising prominence of women in politics has sparked a growing interest in comparing the language of male and female politicians. Many researchers have explored whether gender in politics has had an impact on their metaphor styles. While these studies have been oriented qualitatively and have concentrated on the two-way interaction between metaphor and gender, the possibility that metaphor and gender may interact with other additional factors is largely overlooked. This article adopts a quantitatively oriented approach complemented with textual analysis to explore potential multiple-way interactions between ‘metaphor’, ‘gender’, ‘speech section’ and ‘political role’ in political discourse. By conducting a case study of metaphor use in Hong Kong political speeches, we found evidence of gendered metaphors and their variability according to politicians’ political roles and different rhetorical sections in their speeches.
Keywords: political discourse, metaphor, gender, multifactorial analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Gendered metaphor and political discourse
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Corpus creation
    • 3.2Metaphor identification
    • 3.3Variables
      • 3.3.1 source domain
      • 3.3.2 speech section
    • 3.4Inter-coder reliability
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1 source domain * gender
    • 4.2 source domain * gender * speech section
      • source domain and gender across the speech section of prologue
      • source domain and gender across the speech section of narrative
      • source domain and gender across the speech section of proof
      • source domain and gender across the speech section of epilogue
    • 4.3 source domain * gender * political role
      • source domain and gender across the political role of CSA
      • source domain and gender across the political role of SJ
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19016.zen
References (54)
References
Adams, K. L. (2009). Conceptual metaphors of family in political debates in the USA. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender, and conceptual metaphors (pp. 184–206). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahrens, K. (Ed.). (2009). Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). First Lady, Secretary of State and Presidential Candidate: A comparative study of the role-dependant use of metaphor in politics. In P. Julien, M. Reuchamps, & P. Thibodeau (Eds.), Variation in political metaphor (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahrens, K., & Lee, S. (2009). Gender versus politics: When conceptual models collide in the U.S. Senate. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender, and conceptual metaphor (pp. 62–82). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahrens, K., & Zeng, H. (2017). Conceptualizing EDUCATION in Hong Kong and China. In R. E. Roxas. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 31st Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC 31) (pp. 303–311). Cebu, Philippines: University of the Philippines. Retrieved from [URL]
Atkeson, L. R. (2003). Not all cues are created equal: The conditional impact of female candidates on political engagement. The Journal of Politics, 65(4), 1040–1061. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, J. (2010). The language of female leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgers, C., & Ahrens, K. (In press). Change in metaphorical framing over time: Metaphors of trade in 225 years of State of the Union addresses (1790–2014). Applied Linguistics.
Cameron, D. (2006/2012). On language and sexual politics. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17(5), 563–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Metaphor and gender in British parliamentary debates. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 139–165). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chung, S. F., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C. R. (2004). Using WordNet and SUMO to determine source domains of conceptual metaphors. In D. H. Ji, L. K. Teng, & H. Wang (Eds.), Recent Advancement in Chinese Lexical Semantics: Proceedings of 5th Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop (CLSW-5) (pp. 91–98). Singapore: COLIPS. Retrieved from [URL]
Coates, J. (1987). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Dodson, D. L. (2006). The impact of women in congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fellbaum, C. (2005). WordNet and wordnets. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 665–670). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Flannery, M. C. (2001). Quilting: A feminist metaphor for scientific inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(5), 628–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gertzog, I. N. (1995). Congressional women: Their recruitment, integration, and behaviour (2nd ed.). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N. (1993). Analyzing tabular data: Loglinear and logistic models for social researchers. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (Eds.). (2003). The handbook of language and gender (Vol. 251). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1922). Language, its nature, origin and development. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jones, J. J. (2016). Talk “Like a Man”: The linguistic styles of Hillary Clinton, 1992–2013. Perspectives on Politics, 14(3), 625–642. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karpowitz, C. F., & Mendelberg, T. (2014). The silent sex: Gender, deliberation, and institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2004a). Businesswomen and war metaphors: ‘possessive, jealous and pugnacious’? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 3–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004b). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996/2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980/2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometric, 33(1), 159–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, E. T. (2009). Gendered metaphors of women in power: The case of Hillary Clinton as madonna, unruly woman, bitch and witch. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 254–269). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016). Political metaphor analysis: Discourse and scenarios. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Niles, I., & Pease, A. (2001). Towards a standard upper ontology. In C. Welty, & B. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS-2001) (pp. 2–9). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
Philip, G. (2009). Non una donna in politica, ma una donna politica: Women’s political language in an Italian context. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 83–111). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E., & Koller, V. (2009). Metaphor, politics and gender: A case study from Italy. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 36–61). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PloS ONE, 9(12), e113536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Goschler, J. (2009). Sex differences in the usage of spatial metaphors: A case study of political language. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 166–183). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Talbot, M. (2003). Gender stereotypes: Reproduction and challenge. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 468–486). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tay, D. (2015). Metaphor in case study articles on Chinese university counseling service websites. Chinese Language and Discourse, 6(1), 28–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Quantitative metaphor usage patterns in Chinese psychotherapy talk. Communication & Medicine, 14(1), 51–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tenorio, E. H. (2009). The metaphorical construction of Ireland. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 112–136). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PloS ONE, 6(2), e16782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PloS ONE, 8(1), e52961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? In J. Blommaert & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Political linguistics (pp. 11–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2002). Political discourse and political cognition. In P. Chilton & C. Schäffner (Eds.), Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse (pp. 203–237). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Velasco-Sacristán, M. S. (2005). A critical cognitive-pragmatic approach to advertising gender metaphors. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(3), 219–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, F. (1992). Language, technology, gender, and power. Human Relations, 45(9), 883–904. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2013). Mass media research: An introduction (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Yang, J. (2013). The politics of huanghua: Gender, metaphors, and privatization in China. Language & Communication, 33(1), 61–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Chen, Joanna Zhuoan, Kathleen Ahrens & Dennis Tay
2024. ‘Luxurious’ metaphors in luxury hotel websites in Singapore and Hong Kong: A mixed-methods study. Applied Corpus Linguistics 4:2 ► pp. 100090 ff. DOI logo
Zeng, Winnie Huiheng
2024. Review of Colston, Matlock & Steen (2022): Dynamism in metaphor and beyond. Metaphor and the Social World 14:1 ► pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Alshahrani, Abdulaziz
2023. Discourse analysis of male and female representatives of selected countries at the United Nations general debates. AILA Review 36:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Dou, Jinmeng & Meichun Liu
2023. Exploring color metaphor with Behavioral Profiles: A usage-based analysis on the metaphorical meanings of the Chinese color term bái “white”. Lingua 289 ► pp. 103539 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Ya, Deyi Kong & Chenmeng Zhou
2023. Economy or ecology: metaphor use over time in China’s Government Work Reports. Language and Cognition 15:3 ► pp. 551 ff. DOI logo
Zeng, Winnie Huiheng & Kathleen Ahrens
2023. Corpus-Based Metaphorical Framing Analysis: WAR Metaphors in Hong Kong Public Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 38:3 ► pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Inya, Onwu
2022. ‘As democracy grows’. Metaphor and the Social World 12:2 ► pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
Juszczyk, Konrad, Barbara Konat & Małgorzata Fabiszak
2022. Speakers who metaphorize together – argue together. Metaphor and the Social World 12:2 ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Ya, Zixuan Cui, Yang Hu & Qiong Wang
2022. Exploring the technicality of LIQUID metaphorical chunks in business discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 57 ► pp. 101113 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Ya, Yang Hu, Dicong Gou & Qiong Wang
2022. To orient and to engage: Metaphorical hashtags in Weibo posts of Chinese banks. Journal of Pragmatics 194 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Tay, Dennis
2022. Navigating the Realities of Metaphor and Psychotherapy Research, DOI logo
Lancaster, Mason D.
2021. Metaphor Research and the Hebrew Bible. Currents in Biblical Research 19:3 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Ya, Gongyuan Wang & Hui Ren
2021. To Entertain or to Serve: Chinese and US Banks’ Online Identity Based on a Genre Analysis of Social Media. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 64:2 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.