Review published In:
Metaphor and the Social WorldVol. 10:1 (2020) ► pp.176–182
Book review
Petruck, M. R. L. (Ed.). (2018). MetaNet
Reviewed by
References
References
Arzouan, Y., Goldstein, A., & Faust, M.
(2007) Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, 11601, 69–81. 
Brouwer, H., Crocker, M. W., Venhuizen, N. J., & Hoeks, J. C.
(2017) A neurocomputational model of the n400 and the p600 in language processing. Cognitive Science, 411, 1318–1352.
Carston, R.
(2012) Metaphor and the literal/nonliteral distinction. In K. Allan & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 469–492). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, J.
(2006) From molecule to metaphor: A neural theory of language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gibbs Jr., R. W., & Tendahl, M.
(2006) Cognitive effort and effects in metaphor comprehension: Relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind and Language, 21(3), 379–403.
Gutiérrez, E. D., Shutova, E., Marghetis, T., & Bergen, B. K.
(2016) Literal and metaphorical senses in compositional distributional semantic models. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
Lai, V. T., & Curran, T.
(2013) ERP evidence for conceptual mappings and comparison processes during the comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors. Brain and Language, 1271, 484–496.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Shutova, E., Teufel, S., & Korhonen, A.
(2013) Statistical metaphor processing. Computational Linguistics, 39(2), 301–353.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(2012) A deflationary account of metaphors. In D. Wilson & D. Sperber (Eds.), Meaning and relevance (pp. 97–122). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.