Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 13:2 (2023) ► pp.269292
André, A., & Depauw, S.
(2017) Too much choice, too little impact: a multilevel analysis of the contextual determinants of preference voting. West European Politics, 40 (3), 598–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D.
(1984) A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 255–291). Longman.Google Scholar
Belorgey, J.-M.
(ed.) (2000) Minima sociaux, revenus d’activité, précarité. Commissariat général du Plan/La Documentation française.Google Scholar
Boeynaems, A.
(2019) Figurative Framing in Political Discourse, PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Available at [URL]
Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J.
(2017a) The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review. Metaphor and Symbol, 32 (2), 118–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017b) The Impact of Conventional and Novel Metaphors in News on Issue Viewpoint. International Journal of Communication, 111, 2861–2879.Google Scholar
Boonen, J., Pedersen, E., & Hooghe, M.
(2017) The Effect of Political Sophistication and Party Identification on Voter – Party Congruence. A Comparative Analysis of 30 Countries. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27 (3), 311–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bougher, L.
(2012) The case for metaphor in political reasoning and cognition, Political Psychology, 331, 145–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M.
(2006) Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis, 14 (1), 63–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., & Steen, C. F.
(2017) Recategorizing political fames: A systematic review of metaphorical framing in experiments on political communication, Annuals of the International Communication Association, 41 (2), 1–17.Google Scholar
Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., & Vis, B.
(2019) Metaphorical framing through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis. Language and Cognition, 11 (1), 41–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burgers, C., Konijn, E., & Steen, G.
(2016) Figurative Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony. Communication Theory, 261, 410–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S., Denhière, G. & Kintsch, W.
(2002) The effect of prior knowledge on understanding from text: Evidence from primed recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14 (2), 267–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.
(2011) Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Claes, E. & Hooghe, M.
(2017) The Effect of Political Science Education on Political Trust and Interest: Results from a 5-year Panel Study, Journal of Political Science Education, 13 (1), 33–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coffé, H.
(2013) Women Stay Local, Men Go National and Global? Gender Differences in Political Interest. Sex Roles, 69 (5–6), 323–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coleman, R.
(2019) Designing experiments for the social sciences: How to plan, Create and Execute Research Using experiments, SAGE Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dassonneville, R.
(2012) Electoral volatility, political sophistication, trust and efficacy: A study on changes in voter preferences during the Belgian regional elections of 2009, Acta Politica, 47 (1), 18–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dassonneville, R., Nugent, M., Hooghe, M., & Lau, R. R.
(2020) Do Women Vote Less Correctly? The Effect of Gender on Ideological Proximity Voting and Correct Voting. The Journal of Politics, 82 (3), 1156–1160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Winter, L., Ackaert, J., Meulewaeter, C. & Dumont, P.
(2014) « La participation électorale réelle et potentielle. » in P. Baudewyns (Ed.) Être électeur en Wallonie  : le comportement électoral des Wallons lors des élections législatives de 2007 et de 2010 (pp. 59–82). Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Debras, C., & L’Hôte, E.
(2015) Framing, metaphor and dialogue. A multimodal approach to party conference speeches, Metaphor and the Social World, 5 (2), 177–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S.
(1996) What Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Entman, R. M.
(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43 (4), 51–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A.
Johnson, M.
(2010) Metaphor and cognition. In D. Schmicking and S. Gallagher (Eds.), Handbook of Phenomenology and Cognitive Science (pp. 401–414). Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P.
(2007) The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 351, 1567–1577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, V.
(2009) Missions and Empires: Religious and Political Metaphors in Corporate Discourse. In A. Musolff and J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and Discourse (pp. 116–134). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2010) Metaphor: A Practical Introduction [2nd edition]. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krennmayr, T., Bowdle, B. F., Mulder, G., & Steen, G. J.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1996) Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservative Think, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Larcinese, V.
(2007) Does political knowledge increase turnout? Evidence from the 1997 British general election. Public Choice, 131 (3), 387–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, M. J., Keefer, L. A., Swanson, T. J.
(2017) ‘Undoing’ a rhetorical metaphor: Testing the metaphor extension strategy. Metaphor and Symbol, 32 (2), 63–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C. H.
(2012) News Framing and Public Opinion: A Mediation Analysis of Framing Effects on Political Attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89 (2), 185–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legein, T., Vandeleene, A., Randour, F., Heyvaert, P., Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M.
(2018) Framing the Basic Income: An Experimental Study of How Arguments and Metaphors Influence Individuals’ Opinion Formation. Basic Income Studies, 13 (2), 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luskin, R.
(1987) Measuring Political Sophistication. American Journal of Political Science, 31 (4), 856–899. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
L’Hôte, E.
(2012) ‘Breaking up Britain’? Métaphores et discours sur la dévolution au Royaume-Uni. In J. Perrez, & M. Reuchamps (Eds.), Les relations communautaires en Belgique. Approches politiques et linguistiques (pp. 161–189), Academia-L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Maniquet, F., & Neumann, D.
(2016) L’all ocation universelle: quelques éléments pour y voir plus clair. Regards économiques, 1261, 1–14.Google Scholar
McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W.
(1996) Learning from texts: Effect of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 221, 247–288. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W.
(1996) Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, prior knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 141, 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morton, R. B., & Williams, K. C.
(2008) Experimentation in Political Science. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2004) Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noguera, J. A., & De Wispelaere, J.
(2006) A plea for the use of laboratory experiments in basic income research. Basic Income Studies, 1 (2), 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panzeri, F., Di Paola, S., & Domaneschi, F.
(2021) Does the COVID-19 war metaphor influence reasoning? PLoS ONE, 16 (4): e0250651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M.
(2015a) Special Issue on the Political Impact of Metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World, 5 (2), 165–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T. & Steen, G. J.
Reuchamps, M., Dodeigne, J. & Perrez, J.
(2018) Changing your political mind: the impact of a metaphor on citizens’ representations and preferences for federalism, Regional & Federal Studies, 28 (2), 151–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E.
(2008) Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sopory, P., Dillard, J. P.
(2002) The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28 (3), 382–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J.
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor – Now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (1), 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G. & Burgers, C.
(2014) When Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-Up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS ONE, 9 (12)/, e113536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L.
(2011) Metaphors We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6 (2), e16782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Natural Language Metaphors Covertly Influence Reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8 (1), e52961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H., & Durgin, F. H.
(2011) Metaphor aptness and conventionality: A processing fluency account. Metaphor and Symbol, 26 (3), 206–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P. H., Fleming, J., Lannen, M.
(2019) Variation in methods for studying metaphor: comparing experiments and discourse analysis. In Perrez, J., Reuchamps, M., Thibodeau, P. H. (Eds.), Variation in Political Metaphor (pp. 177–194). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tobin, J.
(1965) On the Economic Status of the Negro, Daedalus, 941, 878–898.Google Scholar
Vanderborght, Y., & Van Parijs, Ph.
(2005) L’allocation universelle, La Découverte. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Stee, S. K.
(2018) Meta-Analysis of the Persuasive Effects of Metaphorical vs. Literal Messages, Communication Studies, 69 (5), 545–566. DOI logoGoogle Scholar