Metaphors, political knowledge and the basic income debate in Belgium
An experimental study of the framing impact of metaphors on political representations
The framing impact of political discourses has long been attested for. Metaphors in particular are known to ease
the understanding of complex concepts and processes. Yet, the question remains to what extent metaphors do work the same on
different recipients? Based on an experimental design, we test a potentially key moderating variable in the study of political
metaphors: political knowledge. Our experiment aims at determining the extent to which the confrontation of individuals to
arguments and metaphors impacts their preferences regarding the implementation of a basic income in Belgium. In particular, we
hypothesize that the marginal effect of metaphors as cognitive shortcuts decreases when political knowledge increases. Our
findings suggest that some metaphorical frames are more successful than others, hereby supporting the idea that the aptness of the
metaphorical frame is a key factor when conducting experiments. We conclude that political knowledge is an important variable when
analyzing the framing effect of metaphors, especially when it goes about very low or very high levels of political knowledge. The
insertion of metaphors in political discourses may easily succeed in rallying individuals behind a given cause, but this would
only work if participants have a lower knowledge of politics.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Understanding the (indirect) effect of metaphors on citizens’ preferences
- 2.1The framing impact of (political) metaphors
- 2.2Studying recipients’ characteristics: the moderating impact of political knowledge
- 3.Method: an Experiment on French-speaking Belgian Citizens
- 3.1Set up of the experiment
- 3.2Coding and measurement of the variables
- 4.Results
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (60)
References
André, A., & Depauw, S. (2017). Too
much choice, too little impact: a multilevel analysis of the contextual determinants of preference
voting. West European
Politics,
40
(3), 598–620. 

Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A
schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook
of Reading
Research (pp. 255–291). Longman.
Belorgey, J.-M. (ed.) (2000). Minima
sociaux, revenus d’activité, précarité. Commissariat général du Plan/La Documentation française.
Boeynaems, A. (2019). Figurative
Framing in Political Discourse, PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Available at [URL]
Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2017a). The
Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature
Review. Metaphor and
Symbol,
32
(2), 118–134. 

Boeynaems, A., Burgers, C., Konijn, E. A., & Steen, G. J. (2017b). The
Impact of Conventional and Novel Metaphors in News on Issue Viewpoint. International Journal of
Communication, 111, 2861–2879.
Boonen, J., Pedersen, E., & Hooghe, M. (2017). The
Effect of Political Sophistication and Party Identification on Voter – Party Congruence. A Comparative Analysis of 30
Countries. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and
Parties,
27
(3), 311–29. 

Bougher, L. (2012). The
case for metaphor in political reasoning and cognition, Political
Psychology, 331, 145–163. 

Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding
Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political
Analysis,
14
(1), 63–82. 

Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., & Steen, C. F. (2017). Recategorizing
political fames: A systematic review of metaphorical framing in experiments on political
communication, Annuals of the International Communication
Association,
41
(2), 1–17.
Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., & Vis, B. (2019). Metaphorical
framing through words vs. concepts: A meta-analysis. Language and
Cognition,
11
(1), 41–65. 

Burgers, C., Konijn, E., & Steen, G. (2016). Figurative
Framing: Shaping Public Discourse Through Metaphor, Hyperbole, and Irony. Communication
Theory, 261, 410–430. 

Caillies, S., Denhière, G. & Kintsch, W. (2002). The
effect of prior knowledge on understanding from text: Evidence from primed
recognition. European Journal of Cognitive
Psychology,
14
(2), 267–286. 

Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians
and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan. 

Charteris-Black, J. (2013). Analysing
Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. Palgrave MacMillan.
Claes, E. & Hooghe, M. (2017). The
Effect of Political Science Education on Political Trust and Interest: Results from a 5-year Panel
Study, Journal of Political Science
Education,
13
(1), 33–45. 

Coffé, H. (2013). Women
Stay Local, Men Go National and Global? Gender Differences in Political Interest. Sex
Roles,
69
(5–6), 323–338. 

Coleman, R. (2019). Designing
experiments for the social sciences: How to plan, Create and Execute Research Using
experiments, SAGE Publications. 

Dassonneville, R. (2012). Electoral
volatility, political sophistication, trust and efficacy: A study on changes in voter preferences during the Belgian regional
elections of 2009, Acta
Politica,
47
(1), 18–41. 

Dassonneville, R., Nugent, M., Hooghe, M., & Lau, R. R. (2020). Do
Women Vote Less Correctly? The Effect of Gender on Ideological Proximity Voting and Correct
Voting. The Journal of
Politics,
82
(3), 1156–1160. 

De Winter, L., Ackaert, J., Meulewaeter, C. & Dumont, P. (2014). « La
participation électorale réelle et potentielle. » in P. Baudewyns (Ed.) Être
électeur en Wallonie : le comportement électoral des Wallons lors des élections législatives de 2007 et de
2010 (pp. 59–82). Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What
Americans know about politics and why it matters. Yale University Press.
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing:
Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of
Communication,
43
(4), 51–58. 

Johnson, M. (2010). Metaphor
and cognition. In D. Schmicking and S. Gallagher (Eds.), Handbook
of Phenomenology and Cognitive
Science (pp. 401–414). Springer. 

Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The
effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific
texts. Memory &
Cognition, 351, 1567–1577. 

Koller, V. (2009). Missions
and Empires: Religious and Political Metaphors in Corporate
Discourse. In A. Musolff and J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor
and
Discourse (pp. 116–134). Palgrave Macmillan. 

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor:
A Practical Introduction [2nd edition]. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors
we live by, University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral
Politics: How Liberals and Conservative Think, University of Chicago Press.
Larcinese, V. (2007). Does
political knowledge increase turnout? Evidence from the 1997 British general election. Public
Choice,
131
(3), 387–411. 

Landau, M. J., Keefer, L. A., Swanson, T. J. (2017). ‘Undoing’
a rhetorical metaphor: Testing the metaphor extension strategy. Metaphor and
Symbol,
32
(2), 63–83. 

Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C. H. (2012). News
Framing and Public Opinion: A Mediation Analysis of Framing Effects on Political
Attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication
Quarterly,
89
(2), 185–204. 

Legein, T., Vandeleene, A., Randour, F., Heyvaert, P., Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2018). Framing
the Basic Income: An Experimental Study of How Arguments and Metaphors Influence Individuals’ Opinion
Formation. Basic Income
Studies,
13
(2), 1–16. 

Luskin, R. (1987). Measuring
Political Sophistication. American Journal of Political
Science,
31
(4), 856–899. 

L’Hôte, E. (2012). ‘Breaking
up Britain’? Métaphores et discours sur la dévolution au
Royaume-Uni. In J. Perrez, & M. Reuchamps (Eds.), Les
relations communautaires en Belgique. Approches politiques et
linguistiques (pp. 161–189), Academia-L’Harmattan.
Maniquet, F., & Neumann, D. (2016). L’all
ocation universelle: quelques éléments pour y voir plus clair. Regards
économiques, 1261, 1–14.
McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning
from texts: Effect of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse
Processes, 221, 247–288. 

McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are
good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, prior knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from
text. Cognition and
Instruction, 141, 1–43. 

Morton, R. B., & Williams, K. C. (2008). Experimentation
in Political Science. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The
Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford University Press. 

Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor
and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe. Palgrave Macmillan. 

Noguera, J. A., & De Wispelaere, J. (2006). A
plea for the use of laboratory experiments in basic income research. Basic Income
Studies,
1
(2), 1–8. 

Panzeri, F., Di Paola, S., & Domaneschi, F. (2021). Does
the COVID-19 war metaphor influence reasoning? PLoS
ONE,
16
(4): e0250651. 

Reuchamps, M., Dodeigne, J. & Perrez, J. (2018). Changing
your political mind: the impact of a metaphor on citizens’ representations and preferences for
federalism, Regional & Federal
Studies,
28
(2), 151–175. 

Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor
in Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
Sopory, P., Dillard, J. P. (2002). The
persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication
Research,
28
(3), 382–419. 

Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G. & Burgers, C. (2014). When
Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-Up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky
(2013). PLoS
ONE,
9
(12)/, e113536. 

Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors
We Think With: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning. PLoS
ONE,
6
(2), e16782. 

Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural
Language Metaphors Covertly Influence Reasoning. PLoS
ONE,
8
(1), e52961. 

Thibodeau, P. H., & Durgin, F. H. (2011). Metaphor
aptness and conventionality: A processing fluency account. Metaphor and
Symbol,
26
(3), 206–226. 

Thibodeau, P. H., Fleming, J., Lannen, M. (2019). Variation
in methods for studying metaphor: comparing experiments and discourse
analysis. In Perrez, J., Reuchamps, M., Thibodeau, P. H. (Eds.), Variation
in Political
Metaphor (pp. 177–194). John Benjamins. 

Tobin, J. (1965). On
the Economic Status of the
Negro, Daedalus, 941, 878–898.
Vanderborght, Y., & Van Parijs, Ph. (2005). L’allocation
universelle, La Découverte. 

Van Stee, S. K. (2018). Meta-Analysis
of the Persuasive Effects of Metaphorical vs. Literal Messages, Communication
Studies,
69
(5), 545–566. 

Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Bogetić, Ksenija
2024.
Not for those of us who know war well
: crisis, metaphor negotiation and collective memory in an era of war
.
Critical Discourse Studies ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.