Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphorical creativity across modes
Edited by Laura Hidalgo-Downing and Blanca Kraljevic Mujic
[Metaphor and the Social World 3:2] 2013
► pp. 180–198

Multimodal metaphors in contemporary experimental literature

| De Montfort University, Leicester

Multimodal metaphor studies has hitherto neglected one key arena in the creative arts: literature. This article explores four case studies of multimodal metaphor within contemporary experimental literature. In poetry, the metaphor EMOTIONS ARE OBJECTS is discussed within Anne Carson’s (2009) accordion ‘poem in a box’, in which the poet struggles with the death of her brother; in literature, Steve Tomasula and Stephen Farrell’s (1996) fold-out fiction TOC and Mark Z. Danielewski’s (2006) novel Only Revolutions, both thematically interested in time and designed to be rotated in reading, are explored to reveal the metaphor TIME IS CIRCULAR MOTION; and in the graphic novel, analysis of Warren Ellis’ (2011) “SVK”, for which readers use a torch to reveal characters’ thoughts printed in UV ink, exposes the metaphor KNOWLEDGE IS LIGHT.

Throughout, it is shown that multimodal metaphors are generated through both the interaction of verbal and visual modes, and through a reader-user’s performative engagement with the text. Moreover, early theorisations of multimodal metaphor in which the two domains (source and target) were required to stem from different modalities, are called into question. Rather, the creative affordances of multimodal literature show such metaphors to be more integrative in nature, both cognitively and semantically.

Keywords: stylistics, multimodality, contemporary literature, cognitive poetics, Conceptual metaphor, multimodal metaphor
Published online: 14 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.3.2.04gib
References
Bray, J.
(2011)  Only Revolutions and the drug of rereading. In J. Bray & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Mark Z. Danielewski (pp. 200–215). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Caballero, R.
(2009) Cutting across the senses: Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 73–94) . Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carson, A.
(2010)  NOX . New York: New Directions.Google Scholar
Carter, R.
(2004)  Language and creativity: The art of common talk . London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cienki, A.
(1998) Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Danielewski, M. Z.
(2006)  Only Revolutions . London & New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Derrida, J.
(1982) Signature event context. In Alan Bass (Trans.), Margins of philosophy (pp. 309–330). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Eggertsson, G. T., & Forceville, C.
(2009) Multimodal expressions of the human victim is animal metaphor in horror films. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 429–449). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
El Refaie, E.
(2009) Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ellis, W., & D’Israeli
(2011)  SVK . London: BERG.Google Scholar
Forceville, C.
(2006) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirren & F. J. R. de M. Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2009) Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp.19–42). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(Eds) (2009)  Multimodal metaphor . Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L.
(1995) The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics , 61, 347–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, A.
(2011) Review of Multimodal metaphor by C. J. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds) 2009  Language and Literature , 21(1), 78–81.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. K.
(2011) Mapping time, charting data: The spatial aesthetic of Mark Z. Danielewski’s Only Revolutions . In J. Bray & A. Gibbons (Eds.), Mark Z. Danielewski (pp. 159–177). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, L.
(2002) Creating things that are not: The role of negation in the poetry of Wislawa Szymborska. Journal of Literary Semantics , 30(2), 113–132.Google Scholar
Kacandes, I.
(2001)  Talk fiction: Literature and the talk explosion . Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(2004)  Don’t think of an elephant . Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980)  Metaphors we live by . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mittelberg, I., & Waugh, L. R.
(2009) Metonymy first, metaphor second: A cognitive-semiotic approach to multimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 329–356). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, M.
(2010) The unfolding: Anne Carson’s NOX . The New Yorker , Retrieved July 12 2010, from [URL].
Sternberg, R. J.
(1999)  Handbook of creativity . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stockwell, P., & Gavins, J.
(2012) About the heart, where it hurt exactly, and how often. Language and Literature , 211, 33–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasula, S., & Farrell, S.
(1996) TOC. Émigre , 371 (no pagination).Google Scholar
Zbikowski, L. M.
(2009) Music, language, and multimodal metaphor. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 359–381). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Davis, Brian
2021. Instrumentalizing the book: Anne Carson’sNoxand books as archives. Frontiers of Narrative Studies 7:1 ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Martín-Gascón, Beatriz
2023. Building bridges between conceptual metaphor theory, L2 speakers’ perception, and pedagogical practice. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 55:2 ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Papa, Victoria
2021. Interfacing grief: haptic autotheory & performance as afterlife in Anne Carson’s Nox. Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory 31:3 ► pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
Plate, L.
2015. How to Do Things with Literature in the Digital Age: Anne Carson's Nox, Multimodality, and the Ethics of Bookishness. Contemporary Women's Writing 9:1 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Praet, Helena Van
2019. Recalibrating categorisation. English Text Construction 12:2 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Steele, Godfrey A.
2024. Media Representation of Gender-Based Violence in Two Cases and Related Examples: A Multimodal Discursive Study. In Caribbean Discourses, ► pp. 323 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.