Article published in:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 4:1 (2014) ► pp. 65–89

Economic competition is like auto racing

Building metaphorical schemas when reading text

| VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| Grand Valley State University, USA
| VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Even though our language is pervaded by metaphor, we do not necessarily think metaphorically. Knowing whether people make conceptual connections between a source and a target domain, and if so under which conditions, is of theoretical as well as practical interest, for example in text design. This paper experimentally investigates under which conditions people build their textual representations of a news article on a metaphorical schema. To disentangle the inconclusive output of recent reaction-time studies, we conduct a memory study. We probe the effect of signaling and conventionality on textual representations — two variables which have been ignored or conflated in previous studies. We find that people are more likely to metaphorically structure their representations of a news article to the extent that it contains novel metaphorical expressions. The inclusion of similes that explicitly signal extended mappings between source and target domains may also act as an aid to integration, although our evidence for this is more equivocal. These findings are discussed in relation to the career of metaphor theory and to the role of deliberateness in metaphor processing.
Keywords: conventional metaphor, novel metaphor, signaling, textual representation, metaphorical schema, recall study
Published online: 05 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.4.1.04kre
References

References

Allbritton, D. W.. (
1995) When metaphors function as schemas: Some cognitive effects of conceptual metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol , 10(1), 33–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allbritton, D. W., McKoon, G., & Gerrig, R. J.. (
1995) Metaphor-based schemas and text representations: Making connections through conceptual metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition , 21(3), 612–625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beger, A.. (
2011) Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. Metaphorik.de , 20, 39–60.Google Scholar
Blasko, D. G.. (
1999) Only the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about metaphor? Journal of Pragmatics , 31, 1675–1683. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F.. (
1997) No pain, no gain in a free-market ideology: A test for cognitive semantics? Metaphor and Symbol , 12, 231–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boronat, C. B.. (
1990)  Effects of base shift and frequency in extended metaphor processing . M. A. dissertation, Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.. (
2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review , 112(1), 193–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., & Turner, T. J.. (
1979) Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology , 11, 177–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, W. F., & Treyens, J. C.. (
1981) Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology , 13, 207–230. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L.. (
2003)  Metaphor in educational discourse . London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Low, G. D.. (
2004) Figurative variation in episodes of educational talk and text. European Journal of English Studies , 8(3), 355–373. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J.. (
2004)  Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis . Houndmills, Basingstoke; Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, W.-Y., & Duann, R.-F.. (
2007) Conceptual metaphors for sars: ‘War’ between whom? Discourse and Society , 18(5), 579–602. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Field, A.. (
2009)  Discovering statistics using SPSS . London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & O’Brian, J. E.. (
1990) Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition , 36, 35–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A.. (
1997) Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology , 48, 163–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, A. C., Mio, J., & Millis, K. K.. (
1989) Metaphors in persuasive communication. In D. Meutsch & R. Viehoff (Eds.), Comprehension of literary discourse; results and problems of interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 131–154). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hunt, H.. (
2004)  Shifting gears. Mexico fights for position in global race . A Reprint from Tierra Grande. International Economy. http://​recenter​.tamu​.edu/Google Scholar
Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., & Solomon, S. K.. (
1973) Memory for tacit implications of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology , 98(1), 203–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S., & Horton, W. S.. (
2000) Conventional language: How metaphorical is it? Journal of Memory and Language , 43, 576–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kintsch, W.. (
1998)  Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A.. (
1978) Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review , 85(5), 363–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kipfer, B. A., & Chapman, R. L.. (
Eds) (2003)  Roget’s thesaurus (6th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Kitis, E., & Milapides, M.. (
1997) Read it and believe it: How metaphor constructs ideology in news discourse: A case study. Journal of Pragmatics , 28, 557–590. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopp, R. R.. (
1995)  Metaphor therapy: Using client-generated metaphors in psychotherapy . New York: Brunnel/Mazel.Google Scholar
Kopp, R. R., & Craw, M. J.. (
1998) Metaphoric language, metaphoric cognition, and cognitive therapy. Psychotherapy , 35(3), 306–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krennmayr, T.. (
2011)  Metaphor in newspapers . Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.. (
1980)  Metaphors we live by . Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Low, G. D.. (
2008) Metaphor and education. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 212–230). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Low, G. D., Littlemore, J., & Köster, A.. (
2008) Metaphor use in three UK university lectures. Applied Linguistics , 29(3), 428–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mannes, S. M., & Kintsch, W.. (
1987) Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction , 4(2), 91–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, B. J. F.. (
1975)  The organization of prose and its effects on memory . Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1984) Text dimensions and cognitive processing. In H. Mandl, N. L. Stein & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 3–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Meyer, R. E.. (
1987)  Educational psychology: A cognitive approach . Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Musolff, A.. (
2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol , 21(1), 23–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. L., O’Brian, E. J., Balota, D. A., & Toyofuku, M. L.. (
1984) Memory search without interference: The role of integration. Cognitive Psychology , 16, 217–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, N. P., & Gibbs, R. W.. (
1990) Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 119(3), 315–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, P. D., Raphael, T. E., TePaske, N., & Hyser, C.. (
1981) The function of metaphor in children’s recall of expository passages. Journal of Reading Behavior , 8(3), 249–261.Google Scholar
Princeton University
(2010)  WordNet . http://​wordnet​.princeton​.edu.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, O.. (
1999) ‘Like an animal i was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in us public discourse. Discourse and Society , 10, 191–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E.. (
2008)  Metaphor in discourse . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J.. (
2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol , 23, 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010) When is metaphor deliberate? In N.-L. Johannesson, D. C. Minugh & C. Alm-Arvius (Eds.), Selected papers from the 2009 Stockholm Metaphor Festival (pp. 43–63). Stockholm: Department of English, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Tendahl, M., & Gibbs, R. W.. (
2008) Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics , 40(11), 1823–1864. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P., & Durgin, F. H.. (
2008) Productive figurative communication: Conventional metaphors facilitate the comprehension of related novel metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language , 58, 521–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thorndyke, P. W.. (
1977) Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology , 9, 77–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W.. (
1983)  Strategies of discourse comprehension . New York & London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Whitney, P., Budd, D., & Mio, J. S.. (
1996) Individual differences in metaphoric facilitation of comprehension. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp. 203–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wickman, S. A., Daniels, M. H., White, L. J., & Fesmire, S. A.. (
1999) A “primer” in conceptual metaphor for counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development , 77(4), 389–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zinken, J.. (
2003) Ideological imagination: Intertextual and correlational metaphors in political discourse. Discourse and Society , 14(4), 507–523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Boeynaems, Amber, Christian Burgers, Elly A. Konijn & Gerard J. Steen
2017. The Effects of Metaphorical Framing on Political Persuasion: A Systematic Literature Review. Metaphor and Symbol 32:2 ► pp. 118 ff. Crossref logo
Burgers, Christian & Gerard J. Steen
2017.  In Irony in Language Use and Communication [Figurative Thought and Language, 1], ► pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Cotter, Colleen, Danniella Samos & Deborah Swinglehurst
2021. Framing obesity in public discourse: Representation through metaphor across text type. Journal of Pragmatics 174 ► pp. 14 ff. Crossref logo
Cárcamo Morales, Benjamín
2019. Teoría de la metáfora conceptual y teoría de la metáfora deliberada: ¿propuestas complementarias?. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada :68 ► pp. 165 ff. Crossref logo
Egg, Markus
2020.  In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Krennmayr, Tina
2015. What Corpus Linguistics Can Tell Us About Metaphor Use In Newspaper Texts. Journalism Studies 16:4 ► pp. 530 ff. Crossref logo
Marhula, Joanna
2018. “It’s like herding butterflies”. Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 64 ff. Crossref logo
Reijnierse, W.Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
2015. How viruses and beasts affect our opinions (or not). Metaphor and the Social World 5:2 ► pp. 245 ff. Crossref logo
Reuchamps, Min, Jeremy Dodeigne & Julien Perrez
2018. Changing your political mind: The impact of a metaphor on citizens’ representations and preferences for federalism. Regional & Federal Studies 28:2 ► pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Reuchamps, Min, Paul H. Thibodeau & Julien Perrez
2019.  In Variation in Political Metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Smirnova, Elizaveta & Svetlana Shustova
2018. Denominal verbs with metaphorical meanings in British business media discourse. Metaphor and the Social World 8:2 ► pp. 267 ff. Crossref logo
Steen, Gerard
2015. Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics 90 ► pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Steen, Gerard
2017. Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Thibodeau, Paul H., Rose K. Hendricks & Lera Boroditsky
2017. How Linguistic Metaphor Scaffolds Reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21:11 ► pp. 852 ff. Crossref logo
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José Manuel
2016. Refining the understanding of novel metaphor in specialised language discourse. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 22:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Vries, Clarissa de, W. Gudrun Reijnierse & Roel M. Willems
2018. Eye movements reveal readers’ sensitivity to deliberate metaphors during narrative reading. Scientific Study of Literature 8:1 ► pp. 135 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.