Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social WorldVol. 4:2 (2014) ► pp.199–224
Traditional and not so traditional metaphors of love in Spanish
A way to spread and create ideologies about romance and gender on the Internet
Metaphors about love in online dating advertisements might seem to be an easy and inconsequential way to express people’s romantic expectations. Using Critical Metaphor Analysis methodology, this paper takes a closer look at a sample of love metaphors used by Spanish-speaking heterosexual ad posters, to show how they use the metaphors to create a discourse of traditional romance in a modern medium, the online dating world. These metaphors are powerful tools for conveying traditional ideologies about romance and relationships. Additionally, they provide ad posters with a useful rhetorical tool for portraying themselves as ideal romantic partners, ‘regular’ and/or ‘normal’ heterosexuals, who play according to the regulatory norms of their gender, allowing them to ‘sell’ themselves as better candidates for romance.
References
Barcelona, A
(1992) El lenguaje del amor romántico en inglés y en español. ATLANTIS, 14(1), 5–27.
Barcelona, A., & Soriano, C
(2004) Metaphorical conceptualization in English and Spanish. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 295–307. 
Cameron, D., & Kulick, D
(2003) Language and sexuality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2006) The semiotics of sex and the discourse of desire. In D. Cameron & D. Kulick (Eds.), The language and sexuality reader (pp. 241–244). London: Routledge.
Charteris-Black, J
(2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cook, G
(2001) The discourse of advertising (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Coupland, J
(1996) Dating advertisements: Discourses of the commodified self. Discourse and Society, 7(2), 187–207.
Goatly, A
Kreyer, R
(2012) “Love is like a stove — it burns you when it’s hot”: A corpus-linguistic view on the (non-)creative use of love-related metaphors in pop songs. In S. Hoffmann, P. Rayson, & G. Leech (Eds.), English corpus linguistics: Looking back, moving forward (pp. 103–115). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Kövecses, Z
(1988) The language of love: The semantics of passion in conversational English. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
(1991) A linguist’s quest for love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8(1), 77–97.
(2000) Metaphor and emotion. Language, culture, and the body in human feeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2002) Metaphor. A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2005) Metaphor in culture universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
(2010a) Metaphor, language, and culture. DELTA Documentacao de Estudos em Linguistica Teorica e Aplicada, 261, 739–757.
(2010b) A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 663–697.
Kyratzis, S
(2007) The semantics of desire: Exploring desire, love and sexuality through metaphor. In H. Sauntson & S. Kyratzis (Eds.), Language, sexualities and desires. Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 96–117). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Marley, C
(2007) Metaphors of identity in dating ads and newspaper articles. Text & Talk, 27(1), 55–78.
(2008) Assuming identities: The workings of intertextual metaphors in a corpus of dating ads. Journal of Pragmatics, 401, 559–576.
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Semino, E
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Semino, E., Deignan, A., & Littlemore, J
(2013) Metaphor, genre, and recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol, 281, 41–59.
Sivulka, J
(2012) Soap, sex, and cigarettes: A cultural history of American advertising (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.