Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social WorldVol. 5:1 (2015) ► pp.42–59
Metaphor in language, discourse, and history
Gieldan and paien in the medieval English religious use of the MORAL ACCOUNTING metaphor
This paper is aimed at verifying the experiential motivation of metaphorical language in a diachronic perspective. More specifically, I have tried to identify how socio-historical-cultural conditions may affect the actualization of a metaphor. To this end, I have grounded this research on Conceptual Metaphor Theory, which presents the linguistic metaphors in language as resulting from a conceptual-level mapping between domains of knowledge. With this in mind, I have restricted the investigation to the evidence of the MORAL ACCOUNTING metaphor in medieval religious instruction texts in England. Linguistic evidence of this metaphor in the Early and High Middle Ages were extracted and aspects of MORAL INTERACTION they express were identified, tabulated and confronted. Lastly, I have sought explanations for the maintenance and variation in the actualization of the metaphor, both in the immediate context of doctrinal production and in the broader context of commercial practices. I have found that, side by side with a surprisingly similar number of occurrences, there is evidence of the highlighting of aspects of MORAL INTERACTION that are situated historically and discursively which considerably affect the frequency of the scenarios of realisation of this metaphor.
References (48)
Allan, K. (2006). On groutnolls and nog-heads: A case study of the interaction between culture and cognition in intelligence metaphors. In A. Stefanowitsch, & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 175–190). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2008). Metaphor and metonymy: A diachronic approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bernárdes, E. (2007). Synergy in the construction of meaning. In M. Fabiszak (Ed.), Language and meaning: Cognitive and functional perspectives (pp. 15–38). Frankfurt am Maim: Peter Lang.
Blair, J. (2005). The Church in Anglo-Saxon society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blake, N. (1992 [2006]). The literary language. In N. Blake (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language Vol. II1 (pp. 500–541). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 
Boggel, S. (2009). Metadiscourse in middle English and early modern English religious texts: A corpus-based study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
Bolton, B. (1983). Medieval reformation. Teaneck: Holmes & Meier Publishers.
Bolton, J.L. (2012). Money in the medieval English economy: 973–1489. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Caller, P., & Guerra, A. (2012). From barter to coin: Shifting cognitive frames in Classical Greek economy. In H. Herrera-Soler & M. White (Eds.), Metaphor and mills: Figurative language in business and economics (pp. 27–48). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cameron, L. (2008). Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2010). The discourse dynamics of framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 77–94). London: Equinox.
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave.
. (2004). Corpus approaches to metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave.
Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dyer, C. (2005). An age of transition? Economy and society in England in the late Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fabiszak, M. (1999). A semantic analysis of emotion terms in Old English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 341, 133–146.
Fabiszak, M., & Hebda, A. (2010). Cognitive historical approaches to emotions: Pride. In M. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp. 261–297). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Frak, R., & Gontier, N. (2010). On constructing a research model for historical cognitive linguistics. In M. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp. 31–69). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 221, 455–479.
Gevaert, C. (2001). Anger in Old and Middle English: A ‘hot’ topic? Belgian Essays on Language and Literature, 2001, 89–101.
Gibbs, R. (2010). The wonderful, chaotic, creative, heroic, challenging world of researching and applying metaphor: A celebration of the past and some peaks into the future. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Graeber, D. (2011). Debt: The first 5000 years. New York: Melville House.
Hall, J.R. (1960 [2000]). A concise Anglo-Saxon dictionary (4th ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Howe, B. (2006). Because you bear this name: Conceptual metaphor and the moral meaning of 1 Peter. Boston, MA: Brill.
Irvine, S. (2006). Beginnings and transitions: Old English. In L. Mugglestone (Ed.), The Oxford history of English (pp. 32–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
. (1993). Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G. (2009). The political mind: A cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Low, G., Todd, Z., Deignan, A., & Cameron, L. (2010). Editors’ introduction. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in use (pp. vii–xii). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Mouton, N. (2013). Do metaphors evolve? The case of the social organism. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1-2), 312–348.
Mouton, N.T. (2012). Metaphor and economic thought: A historical perspective. In H. Herrera-Soler & M. White (Eds.), Metaphor and mills: Figurative language in business and economics (pp. 49–76). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Musolff, A. (2010). Metaphor in discourse history. In M. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp. 70–90). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nazar, L. (2013). Pagando na mesma moeda: metáfora da CONTABILIDADE MORAL em textos medievais ingleses. Unpublished, MA thesis, Niterói: Universidade Federal Fluminense.
Pantin, W. (1955 [2010]). The English church in the fourteenth century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 63–105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stenton, F. (1971). Anglo-Saxon England (2nd ed.). Oxford: Claredon Press.
Taub, S. (1990). Moral accounting. Unpublished manuscript. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Toon, T. (1992 [2005]). Old English dialects. In R. Hogg (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language (pp. 409–451). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Trim, R. (2007). Metaphor networks: The comparative evolution of figurative language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
. (2011). Metaphor and the historical evolution of conceptual mapping. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vereza, S. (2010). Articulating the conceptual and the discursive dimensions of figurative language in argumentative texts. DELTA. Documentação de estudos em linguística teórica e aplicada, 261, 701–718.
Winters, M. (2010). Introduction: On the emergence of diachronic cognitive linguistics. In M. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp. 3–27). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zanotto, M., & Palma, D. (2008). Opening Pandora’s box: Multiple readings of ‘a metaphor’. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 11–44). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Zanotto, M., Cameron, L., & Cavalcanti, M. (2008). Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 1–8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Taylor, Charlotte & Jasmin Kidgell
2021. Flu-like pandemics and metaphor pre-covid: A corpus investigation. Discourse, Context & Media 41 ► pp. 100503 ff. 
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.