Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 5:1 (2015) ► pp.42–59

Metaphor in language, discourse, and history

Gieldan and paien in the medieval English religious use of the MORAL ACCOUNTING metaphor

This paper is aimed at verifying the experiential motivation of metaphorical language in a diachronic perspective. More specifically, I have tried to identify how socio-historical-cultural conditions may affect the actualization of a metaphor. To this end, I have grounded this research on Conceptual Metaphor Theory, which presents the linguistic metaphors in language as resulting from a conceptual-level mapping between domains of knowledge. With this in mind, I have restricted the investigation to the evidence of the MORAL ACCOUNTING metaphor in medieval religious instruction texts in England. Linguistic evidence of this metaphor in the Early and High Middle Ages were extracted and aspects of MORAL INTERACTION they express were identified, tabulated and confronted. Lastly, I have sought explanations for the maintenance and variation in the actualization of the metaphor, both in the immediate context of doctrinal production and in the broader context of commercial practices. I have found that, side by side with a surprisingly similar number of occurrences, there is evidence of the highlighting of aspects of MORAL INTERACTION that are situated historically and discursively which considerably affect the frequency of the scenarios of realisation of this metaphor.

Keywords: Historical Cognitive Linguistics, MORAL ACCOUNTING metaphor, experiential motivation, conceptual metaphor, medieval sermons and homilies.
Published online: 10 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.03naz
References
Allan, K
(2006) On groutnolls and nog-heads: A case study of the interaction between culture and cognition in intelligence metaphors. In A. Stefanowitsch, & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 175–190). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2008) Metaphor and metonymy: A diachronic approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bernárdes, E
(2007) Synergy in the construction of meaning. In M. Fabiszak (Ed.), Language and meaning: Cognitive and functional perspectives (pp. 15–38). Frankfurt am Maim: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Blair, J
(2005) The Church in Anglo-Saxon society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blake, N
(1992 [2006]) The literary language. In N. Blake (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language Vol. II1 (pp. 500–541). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boggel, S
(2009) Metadiscourse in middle English and early modern English religious texts: A corpus-based study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bolton, B
(1983) Medieval reformation. Teaneck: Holmes & Meier Publishers.Google Scholar
Bolton, J.L
(2012) Money in the medieval English economy: 973–1489. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Caller, P., & Guerra, A
(2012) From barter to coin: Shifting cognitive frames in Classical Greek economy. In H. Herrera-Soler & M. White (Eds.), Metaphor and mills: Figurative language in business and economics (pp. 27–48). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L
(2008) Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) The discourse dynamics of framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities (pp. 77–94). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, J
(2011) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Corpus approaches to metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A
(2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyer, C
(2005) An age of transition? Economy and society in England in the late Middle Ages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fabiszak, M
(1999) A semantic analysis of emotion terms in Old English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 341, 133–146.Google Scholar
Fabiszak, M., & Hebda, A
(2010) Cognitive historical approaches to emotions: Pride. In M. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp. 261–297). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frak, R., & Gontier, N
(2010) On constructing a research model for historical cognitive linguistics. In M. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp. 31–69). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G
(2005) The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 221, 455–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gevaert, C
(2001) Anger in Old and Middle English: A ‘hot’ topic? Belgian Essays on Language and Literature, 2001, 89–101.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R
(2010) The wonderful, chaotic, creative, heroic, challenging world of researching and applying metaphor: A celebration of the past and some peaks into the future. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graeber, D
(2011) Debt: The first 5000 years. New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Hall, J.R
(1960 [2000]) A concise Anglo-Saxon dictionary (4th ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Howe, B
(2006) Because you bear this name: Conceptual metaphor and the moral meaning of 1 Peter. Boston, MA: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, S
(2006) Beginnings and transitions: Old English. In L. Mugglestone (Ed.), The Oxford history of English (pp. 32–60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M
(1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1993) Moral imagination: Implications of cognitive science for ethics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G
(2009) The political mind: A cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Low, G., Todd, Z., Deignan, A., & Cameron, L
(2010) Editors’ introduction. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in use (pp. vii–xii). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mouton, N
(2013) Do metaphors evolve? The case of the social organism. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1-2), 312–348.Google Scholar
Mouton, N.T
(2012) Metaphor and economic thought: A historical perspective. In H. Herrera-Soler & M. White (Eds.), Metaphor and mills: Figurative language in business and economics (pp. 49–76). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, A
(2010) Metaphor in discourse history. In M. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp. 70–90). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nazar, L
(2013) Pagando na mesma moeda: metáfora da CONTABILIDADE MORAL em textos medievais ingleses. Unpublished, MA thesis, Niterói: Universidade Federal Fluminense.Google Scholar
Pantin, W
(1955 [2010]) The English church in the fourteenth century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and symbol, 22(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, E
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A
(2006) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 63–105). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stenton, F
(1971) Anglo-Saxon England (2nd ed.). Oxford: Claredon Press.Google Scholar
Taub, S
(1990) Moral accounting. Unpublished manuscript. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Toon, T
(1992 [2005]) Old English dialects. In R. Hogg (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language (pp. 409–451). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trim, R
(2007) Metaphor networks: The comparative evolution of figurative language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) Metaphor and the historical evolution of conceptual mapping. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vereza, S
(2010) Articulating the conceptual and the discursive dimensions of figurative language in argumentative texts. DELTA. Documentação de estudos em linguística teórica e aplicada, 261, 701–718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winters, M
(2010) Introduction: On the emergence of diachronic cognitive linguistics. In M. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan (Eds.), Historical cognitive linguistics (pp. 3–27). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanotto, M., & Palma, D
(2008) Opening Pandora’s box: Multiple readings of ‘a metaphor’. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 11–44). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanotto, M., Cameron, L., & Cavalcanti, M
(2008) Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach. In M. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 1–8). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Taylor, Charlotte & Jasmin Kidgell
2021. Flu-like pandemics and metaphor pre-covid: A corpus investigation. Discourse, Context & Media 41 ► pp. 100503 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.