Cover not available
Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 5:1 (2015) ► pp.124–136

On using a dictionary to identify the basic senses of words

| Universidad de Extremadura

This article-cum-narrative reflects on the use — indeed usefulness — of a dictionary in helping the researcher to identify metaphorical and non-metaphorical uses of language. Focusing on a group of ‘saying’ verbs as they were used in a face-to-face conversation between a university lecturer and an undergraduate student, it describes a researcher’s attempts to use the dictionary recommended by the Pragglejaz Group in their seminal article on metaphor identification (2007) to discover what basic sense of different words might (or might not) motivate their metaphorical meaning in context. The quest to identify the basic meanings of these verbs using this dictionary was fraught with difficulties and led to a less than satisfactory dénouement.

Keywords: dictionary, metaphor identification, discourse
Published online: 10 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.1.07mac
References
Baker, C.F., & Ruppenhofer, J
(2002 February). FrameNet’s frames vs. Levin’s verb classes. In J. Larson & M. Paster (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 27–38). Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Biber, D
(1991) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1995) Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L
(2008) Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M.S. Zanotto, L. Cameron & M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor is use: An applied linguistic approach (pp. 45–62). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M
(1995) Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 161, 141–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W
(1991) A new approach to English grammar, on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dorst, A.G
(2011) Metaphor in fiction: Language, thought and communication. Oisterwijk: UitgeverijBOXPress.Google Scholar
Herrmann, J.B
(2013) Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. Utrecht: LOT dissertation series.Google Scholar
Kaal, A.A
(2012) Metaphor in conversation. Oisterwijk: UitgeverijBOXPress.Google Scholar
Krennmayr, T
(2011) Metaphor in newspapers. Utrecht: LOT dissertation series.Google Scholar
Levin, B
(1993) English verb classes and alternations: A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M
(2005) Argument realization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R
(2006) Ten criteria for a spoken grammar. Explorations in Corpus Linguistics, 271, 27–52.Google Scholar
Meinunger, A
(2006) On the discourse impact of subordinate clauses. The architecture of focus, 821, 459–487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsen, D.R
(1994) The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rundell, M., & Fox, G
(Eds.) (2007) Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners (2nd ed.). Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Steen, G.J., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., Kaal, A.A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Falck, Marlene Johansson & Lacey Okonski
2022. Procedure for Identifying Metaphorical Scenes (pims): A Cognitive Linguistics Approach to Bridge Theory and Practice. Cognitive Semantics 8:2 ► pp. 294 ff. DOI logo
Julich-Warpakowski, Nina & Paula Pérez Sobrino
2023. Introduction. Metaphor and the Social World 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
MacArthur, Fiona
2016. Beyond Engaged Listenership: Assessing Spanish Undergraduates’ Active Participation in Academic Mentoring Sessions in English as Academic Lingua Franca. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2016 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
MacArthur, Fiona
2019. Chapter 14. Linguistic metaphor identification in English as a lingua franca. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 290 ff. DOI logo
Semino, Elena
2019. Chapter 15. Afterword: Some reflections on MIPVU across languages. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 314 ff. DOI logo
Zacharias, Sally
2021. Review of Piquer-Píriz & Alejo-González (2020): Metaphor in Foreign Language Instruction. Metaphor and the Social World 11:2 ► pp. 360 ff. DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan, Göran Jacobsson & Liina Paju
2021. Desiderata for metaphor theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and motion-emotion metaphoremes. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Motion Metaphors in Music Criticism [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 10], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.