Book review
Kevin E. Moore. The Spatial Language of Time. Metaphor, Metonymy and Frames of Reference. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. xxv + 334 pp. ISBN 9789027223968
References (30)
References
Allan, K. (1995). The anthropocentricity of the English word(s) back
. Cognitive Linguistics, 61, 11–31.
Bledsoe, C. (2002). Contingent lives: Fertility, time, and aging in West Africa. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Bledsoe, C. (2005). Reproductive relativity: Time, space, and Western contraception in rural Gambia. The Ahfad Journal, 221, 3–20.
Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 131, 185–189.
Brdar, M., Omazic, M., Pavicic, V., Gradecak-Erdeljic, T., & Buljan, G. (2011). Space and time in language. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Fillmore, C. (1982). Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In R. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place and action: Studies in deixis and related topics (pp. 31–59). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space → time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 171, 537–565.
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Haspelmath, M. (1997). From space to time: Temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. München: Lincom Europa.
Lakoff, G. (2008). The neural theory of metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
McCourt, C. (2013). Childbirth, midwifery and concepts of time. Oxford & New York: Berghahn Books.
McGlone, M., & Harding, J. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 241, 1211–1223.
Moore, K. E. (2000). Spatial experience and temporal metaphors in Wolof: Point of view, conceptual mapping, and linguistic practice. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Moore, K. E. (2001). Deixis and the front/back opposition in temporal metaphors. In A. Cienki, B. Luka & M. Smith (Eds.), Conceptual and discourse factors in linguistic structure (pp. 153–167). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Moore, K. E. (2006). Space-to-time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(2), 199–244.
Núñez, R., Motz, B., & Teuscher, U. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego- and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 211, 133–146.
Núñez, R., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450.
Sapir, E. (1949). Selected writings of Edward Sapir. [Edited by David Mandelbaum]. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Svorou, S. (1988). The experiential basis of the grammar of space: Evidence from the languages of the world. Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics: Volume 1, concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vandeloise, C. (1991). Spatial prepositions: A case study from French. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. [Edited by J. B. Carroll]. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.