Article published In:
The political impact of metaphorsEdited by Julien Perrez and Min Reuchamps
[Metaphor and the Social World 5:2] 2015
► pp. 205–222
Edited by Julien Perrez and Min Reuchamps
[Metaphor and the Social World 5:2] 2015
► pp. 205–222
Media rhetoric plays the market
The logic and power of metaphors behind the financial crises since 2006
This article examines the logic and power of financial news metaphors in the current economic climate. The sequence of global financial crises starting in late 2007 led to a particular discursive phenomenon in financial news. Newspapers constructed, with vivid imagery (e.g., toxic loans, nervous markets to be calmed down), a globalized register for talking and writing about the crises. The empirical study of 3,730 Dutch and Flemish-Belgian financial news articles (2,042,596 words) investigates how during 2006–2013 metaphor power (De Landtsheer, 2009) interacts with financial-economic indicators. It is suggested, on the basis of the case study, that financial news articles generally may be more metaphorical during crises; metaphor power significantly correlates with Eurostat financial-economic indicators in either a positive direction (unemployment rates, public debt) or a negative one (gross national product, consumer confidence).
References (50)
Alejo, R. (2010). Where does the money go? An analysis of the container metaphor in economics: The market and the economy. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1137–1150. 
Awab, S., & Norazit, L. (2013). ‘Challenging’ times or ‘turbulent’ times: A study of the choice of metaphors used to refer to the 2008 economic crisis in Malaysia and Singapore. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(2), 209–233.
Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.19–43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cacciari, C. (2001). Cognitive psychology of figurative thought and figurative language. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, 8 (pp. 5632–5637). Amsterdam, Paris, New York, Oxford, Shannon, Singapore, & Tokyo: Elsevier.
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2006). The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690.
Catalano, T., & Waugh, L. (2013). The language of money: How verbal and visual metonymy shapes public opinion about financial events. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(2), 31–60.
CBS. Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek, The Netherlands [Central Office for Statistics, The Netherlands). Retrieved from [URL]
Charteris-Black, J., & Ennis, T. (2001). A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 249–266.
Charteris-Black, J., & Musolff, A. (2003). ‘Battered hero’ or ‘innocent victim’? A comparative study of metaphors for euro trading in British and German financial reporting. English for Specific Purposes, 221, 153–176.
Chilton, P. (1996). Security metaphors: Cold War discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang.
Dalalau, D. (2013). Metaphors describing the economic and financial crisis in business press articles. Studia Universitatis Petru Maior – Philologia, 151, 167–178.
Deetz, S., & Mumby, D. (1985). Metaphors, information and power. In B.D. Ruben (Ed.), Information and behavior Vol. 11, (pp. 369–386). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
Eurostat. European Statistics. Retrieved from [URL]
De Landtsheer, C. (1991). Function and the language of politics. A linguistic uses and gratifications approach. Communication & Cognition, 24(3–4), 299–344.
. (2009). Collecting political meaning from the count of metaphor. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourses (pp.73–96). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Landtsheer, C., Kalkhoven, L., & Broes, L. (2011). De beeldspraak van Geert Wilders, een Tsunami over Nederland? [The metaphors of Geert Wilders, a Tsunami over the Netherlands], Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 39(4), 5–21.
Feder Kittay, E. (1987). Metaphor. Its cognitive force and linguistic structure. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gibbs, R.W. Jr, & Colston, H.L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., Leggitt, J.S., & Turner, E.A. (2002). What’s special about figurative language in emotional communication? In S.R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions (pp. 125–150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gregg, R.B. (2004). Embodied meaning in American public discourse during the Cold War. In F.A. Beer & C. De Landtsheer (Eds.), Metaphorical world politics (pp. 59–73). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
Hirte, K., & Pühringer, S. (2013). The financial crisis as a tsunami: Discourse profiles of economist in the financial crisis. Retrieved from [URL]
Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Kinder, D.R. (2003). Communication and politics in the age of information. In D.O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 357–393). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kleinnijenhuis, J. (2009). Invloed van economisch nieuws op de kredietcrisis [The influence of economic news on the credit crisis] Bank en effectenbedrijf, 41, 20–24.
Kleinnijenhuis, J., Schultz, F., Oegema, D., & Utz, S. (2015). The mediating role of the news in the BP oil spill crisis 2010: How US news is influenced by public relations and in turn affects public awareness, foreign news and the share price. Communication Research, 42(3), 408–428.
Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and human feeling. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Measuring the reliability of qualitative text analysis data. Quality & Quantity, 38(6), 787–800.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Lopez, A.M.R., & Llopis, M.A.O. (2010). Metaphorical pattern analysis in financial texts: Framing the crisis in positive or negative metaphorical terms. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(12), 3300–3313.
Mooy, J.J. (1976). A study of metaphor: On the nature of metaphorical expressions with special reference to their reference. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
Musolff, A. (2007). What role do metaphors play in racial prejudice? The function of anti-Semitic imagery in Hitler’s Mein Kampf. Patterns of Prejudice, 41(1), 21–43.
National Bank of Belgium Statistics. [URL]
Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1979/1993). Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.
Richards, I.A. (1936). A philosophy of rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rooman, H. (2009). The banks were blown down by the media? A quantitative analysis. Master’s thesis in Political Communication, University of Antwerp.
Sardinha, T.B. (2011). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 11(2), 329–360.
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J.P (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419.
Statbel. Statistics Belgium. Retrieved from [URL]
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.
Steen, G.J., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S.T. (2007). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Thibodeau, P.H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782.
. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961.
Toncar, M.F., & Munch, J.M. (2003). The influence of simple and complex tropes on believability, importance and memory. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(4), 39–53.
Tsoukas, H. (1991). The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 566–585.
White, M. (2004). Turbulence and turmoil in the market or the language of a financial crisis. Ibérica, 71, 71–86.
Williams, A.E., Davidson, R., & Yochim, E.C. (2011). Who’s to blame when a business fails? How journalistic death metaphors influence responsibility attributions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(3), 541–561.
Woo, G. (2012). Natural hazard metaphors for financial crises. Retrieved from
Zinken, J. (2004). Metaphoric practices in the German Wende discourse. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 25(5–6), 1–16.
Cited by (43)
Cited by 43 other publications
Sultan, Onur & Christʼl De Landtsheer
2024. Metaphors in Daesh Propaganda: A Spark Lit in Iraq to Burn the Whole Globe. PCS – Politics, Culture and Socialization 10+11:2019-2020 ► pp. 51 ff. 
Tan, Xiaojuan, Alan Cienki & Bertie Kaal
2024. The diachronic and cross-linguistic use of trade metaphors in U.S.-China governmental discourse. Metaphor and the Social World 14:1 ► pp. 130 ff.
Hu, Geyang & Yifang Liu
2023. Language Expression and Economic Value. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 35:3 ► pp. 1 ff.
Sun, Ya, Yang Hu, Dicong Gou & Qiong Wang
2022. To orient and to engage: Metaphorical hashtags in Weibo posts of Chinese banks. Journal of Pragmatics 194 ► pp. 87 ff.
Diedkova, Ganna & Christ'l De Landtsheer
2021. Going negative by metaphors: The Donbass conflict in the Russian and the Ukrainian press. PCS – Politics, Culture and Socialization 9:1 and 2-2018 ► pp. 7 ff.
Zeng, Winnie Huiheng, Christian Burgers & Kathleen Ahrens
2021. Framing metaphor use over time: ‘Free Economy’ metaphors in Hong Kong political discourse (1997–2017). Lingua 252 ► pp. 102955 ff.
Ancarno, Clyde
2020. Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 165 ff.
Angermuller, Johannes
2020. Poststructuralist Discourse Studies: From Structure to Practice. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 235 ff.
Björkvall, Anders
2020. The Critical Analysis of Genre and Social Action. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 601 ff.
Blommaert, Jan, Laura Smits & Noura Yacoubi
2020. Context and Its Complications. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 52 ff.
Burgers, Christian & Ahrens, Kathleen
2020. Change in Metaphorical Framing: Metaphors of TRade in 225 Years of State of the Union Addresses (1790–2014). Applied Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 260 ff.
Busch, Brigitta
2020. Discourse, Emotions and Embodiment. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 327 ff.
Anna De Fina & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2020. The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies,
Fina, Anna De & Alexandra Georgakopoulou
2020. Rethinking Narrative: Tellers, Tales and Identities in Contemporary Worlds. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 91 ff.
Demjén, Zsófia & Elena Semino
2020. Metaphor, Metonymy and Framing in Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 213 ff.
Deschrijver, Cedric
2020. Mediatized Communication and Linguistic Reflexivity in Contemporary Public and Political Life. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 687 ff.
Fabricio, Branca Falabella & Luiz Paulo Moita-Lopes
2020. Historicity, Interdiscursivity and Intertextuality in Discourse Studies. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 70 ff.
Goebel, Zane
2020. Transnationalism, Globalization and Superdiversity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 377 ff.
Hammersley, Martyn
2020. Ethics and the Study of Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 465 ff.
Hart, Christopher
2020. Cognitive Linguistic and Experimental Methods in Critical Discourse Studies. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 186 ff.
Heinrichsmeier, Rachel
2020. Doing Micro-Analysis of Discourse: The Case of Ageing and Wellbeing. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 143 ff.
Hofstetter, Emily
2020. Sequence Organization: Understanding What Drives Talk. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 121 ff.
Jaworska, Sylvia
2020. Corporate Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 666 ff.
Jones, Rodney H.
2020. Discourse Analysis and Digital Surveillance. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 708 ff.
Lai, Yi-Ju & Kendall A. King
2020. Diversity and Inclusion in Education. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 505 ff.
Lamb, Gavin & Christina Higgins
2020. Posthumanism and Its Implications for Discourse Studies. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 350 ff.
Lee, Tong King & Li Wei
2020. Translanguaging and Momentarity in Social Interaction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 394 ff.
Lytra, Vally
2020. Discourse and Religion in Educational Practice. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 571 ff.
Mooney, Annabelle
2020. The Discourses of Money and the Economy. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 644 ff.
Moore, Robert
2020. Registers, Styles, Indexicality. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 9 ff.
Mortensen, Kristine Køhler & Tommaso M. Milani
2020. Intersectionality, Affect and Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 417 ff.
Rheindorf, Markus
2020. Rhetorics, Discourse and Populist Politics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 622 ff.
Roth-Gordon, Jennifer
2020. Situating Discourse Analysis in Ethnographic and Sociopolitical Context. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 32 ff.
Schreiber, Brooke R., Mohammad Naseh Nasrollahi Shahri & Suresh Canagarajah
2020. Expanding Academic Discourses: Diverse Englishes, Modalities and Spatial Repertoires. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 437 ff.
Seargeant, Philip & Korina Giaxoglou
2020. Discourse and the Linguistic Landscape. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 306 ff.
Shuman, Amy & Carol Bohmer
2020. Discourse and Narrative in Legal Settings: The Political Asylum Process. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 547 ff.
Sidnell, Jack
2020. Sign Theory and the Materiality of Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 282 ff.
Tan, Sabine, Kay O’Halloran & Peter Wignell
2020. Multimodality. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 263 ff.
Wee, Lionel
2020. Migrants, Citizenship and Language Rights. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 487 ff.
Zavala, Virginia & Michele Back
2020. Discourse and Racialization. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 527 ff.
Lavalette, Kiki Y. Renardel de, Corina Andone & Gerard J. Steen
2019. Figurative analogies and how they are resisted in British Public Bill Committee debates. Metaphor and the Social World 9:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Preface. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. xxiii ff.
[no author supplied]
2020. Index. In The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies, ► pp. 732 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.