Article published in:
The political impact of metaphors
Edited by Julien Perrez and Min Reuchamps
[Metaphor and the Social World 5:2] 2015
► pp. 245–263

How viruses and beasts affect our opinions (or not)

The role of extendedness in metaphorical framing

| University of Amsterdam
| VU University Amsterdam
Based on the assumption that extended metaphor may constitute a case of deliberate metaphor and therefore has the potential to influence people’s opinions, this paper investigates whether extending a metaphorical frame in a text leads people to perceive policy measures that are in line with that frame as more effective for solving a crime problem than other policy measures. The metaphorical frames ‘Crime is a virus’ and ‘Crime is a beast’ were extended in one experiment each via a series of additional conventional metaphorical expressions having crime as the target domain and beasts/viruses as the source domain. Participants (N = 354, Experiment 1; N = 361, Experiment 2) were randomly assigned to one of five experimental conditions with increasing numbers of sentences containing metaphorical expressions, and rated the effectiveness of a set of policy measures to solve the crime problem described in the text. The data yield limited support for our hypothesis. When controlling for political affiliation, the ratings for frame-consistent measures trended in the hypothesised direction in Experiment 2. Experiment 1 yielded a trend for frame-inconsistent measures. These results suggest that metaphorical framing effects may be more subtle than has been assumed.
Keywords: metaphor, framing, framing effects, reasoning, experiments
Published online: 28 September 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.5.2.04rei
References

References

Burgers, C., de Graaf, A., & Callaars, S.
(2012) Differences in actual persuasiveness between experiential and professional expert evidence. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 1(2), 194–208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J.A.
(1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Entman, R.M.
(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faul F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A.
(2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, C.E., Slater, M.D., & Myers, T.A.
(2013) Fear and anger responses to local news coverage of alcohol-related crimes, accidents, and injuries: Explaining news effects on policy support using a representative sample of messages and people. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 373–392. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, T.K.
(2012) Toll booths on the information superhighway? Policy metaphors in the case of net neutrality. Political Communication, 29(3), 278–298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalmoe, N.P.
(2014) Fueling the fire: Violent metaphors, trait aggression, and support for political violence. Political Communication, 31(4), 545–563. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krennmayr, T.
(2011) Metaphor in newspapers. LOT Dissertation Series, 276. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Krennmayr, T., Bowdle, B.F., Mulder, G., & Steen, G.J.
(2014) Economic competition is like auto racing. Building metaphorical schemas when reading text. Metaphor and the Social World, 4(1), 65–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lau, R.R., & Schlesinger, M.
(2005) Policy frames, metaphorical reasoning, and support for public policies. Political Psychology, 26(1), 77–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nay, C.G., & Brunson, M.W.
(2013) A war of words: Do conflict metaphors affect beliefs about managing “unwanted” plants? Societies, 3(2), 158–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortony, A.
(1975) Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory, 25 (1), 45–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peer, E., Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Mueller, P.
(2012) Screening participants from previous studies on Amazon Mechanical Turk and Qualtrics. Unpublished manuscript, retrieved from https://​experimentalturk​.files​.wordpress​.com​/2012​/02​/screening​-amt​-workers​-on​-qualtrics​-5​-2​.pdf.
Robins, S., & Mayer, R.E.
(2000) The metaphor framing effect: Metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas. Discourse Process, 30(1), 57–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rundell, M.
(Ed.) (2002) Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scherer, A.M., Scherer, L.D., & Fagerlin, A.
(2015) Getting ahead of illness: Using metaphors to influence medical decision making. Medical Decision Making, 35(1), 37–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scheufele, D.A., & Tewksbury, D.
(2007) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
Schön, D.
(1979) Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 137–163). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semino, E.
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J.P.
(2002) The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.J.
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
In press). Elaborating, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics.
Steen, G.J., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.J., Reijnierse, W.G., & Burgers, C.
(2014) When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS ONE, 9(12), e113536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M.W., Raymond, A., & Vig, W.
(2000) The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804–829. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P.H., & Boroditsky, L.
(2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

No author info given
2018.  In Attention to Metaphor [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 7], Crossref logo
Bogetić, Ksenija
2017. Language is a ‘Beautiful Creature’, not an ‘Old Fridge’ . Metaphor and the Social World 7:2 ► pp. 190 ff. Crossref logo
Burgers, Christian
2016. Conceptualizing Change in Communication Through Metaphor. Journal of Communication 66:2 ► pp. 250 ff. Crossref logo
Flusberg, Stephen J., Mark Lauria, Samuel Balko & Paul H. Thibodeau
2020. Effects of Communication Modality and Speaker Identity on Metaphor Framing. Metaphor and Symbol 35:2 ► pp. 136 ff. Crossref logo
Hart, Christopher
2018. ‘Riots engulfed the city’: An experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourses of disorder. Discourse & Society 29:3 ► pp. 279 ff. Crossref logo
Hart, Christopher
2020. Animals vs. armies. Journal of Language and Politics Crossref logo
Kersten, Mike, Cathy R. Cox, Erin A. Van Enkevort & Robert B. Arrowood
2019. The Influence of Money-related Metaphors on Financial Anxiety and Spending. Metaphor and Symbol 34:4 ► pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr, W. Gudrun Reijnierse & Gerard J. Steen
2019.  In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Poppi, Fabio & Peter Kravanja
2019. Sic vita est: Visual representation in painting of the conceptual metaphor LIFE IS A JOURNEY. Semiotica 2019:230 ► pp. 541 ff. Crossref logo
Poppi, Fabio I. M., Marianna Bolognesi & Amitash Ojha
2020. Imago Dei: Metaphorical conceptualization of pictorial artworks within a participant-based framework. Semiotica 2020:236-237 ► pp. 349 ff. Crossref logo
Reuchamps, Min, Jeremy Dodeigne & Julien Perrez
2018. Changing your political mind: The impact of a metaphor on citizens’ representations and preferences for federalism. Regional & Federal Studies 28:2 ► pp. 151 ff. Crossref logo
Steen, Gerard
2017. Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Thibodeau, Paul
2017. The function of metaphor framing, deliberate or otherwise, in a social world. Metaphor and the Social World 7:2 ► pp. 270 ff. Crossref logo
van Poppel, Lotte
2020. The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation Crossref logo
Van Stee, Stephanie K.
2018. Meta-Analysis of the Persuasive Effects of Metaphorical vs. Literal Messages. Communication Studies 69:5 ► pp. 545 ff. Crossref logo
Vogiatzis, Anastasios
2019.  In Variation in Political Metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 05 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.