Article published In:
The political impact of metaphorsEdited by Julien Perrez and Min Reuchamps
[Metaphor and the Social World 5:2] 2015
► pp. 245–263
Edited by Julien Perrez and Min Reuchamps
[Metaphor and the Social World 5:2] 2015
► pp. 245–263
How viruses and beasts affect our opinions (or not)
The role of extendedness in metaphorical framing
Based on the assumption that extended metaphor may constitute a case of deliberate metaphor and therefore has the potential to influence people’s opinions, this paper investigates whether extending a metaphorical frame in a text leads people to perceive policy measures that are in line with that frame as more effective for solving a crime problem than other policy measures. The metaphorical frames ‘Crime is a virus’ and ‘Crime is a beast’ were extended in one experiment each via a series of additional conventional metaphorical expressions having crime as the target domain and beasts/viruses as the source domain. Participants (N = 354, Experiment 1; N = 361, Experiment 2) were randomly assigned to one of five experimental conditions with increasing numbers of sentences containing metaphorical expressions, and rated the effectiveness of a set of policy measures to solve the crime problem described in the text. The data yield limited support for our hypothesis. When controlling for political affiliation, the ratings for frame-consistent measures trended in the hypothesised direction in Experiment 2. Experiment 1 yielded a trend for frame-inconsistent measures. These results suggest that metaphorical framing effects may be more subtle than has been assumed.
Keywords: metaphor, framing, framing effects, reasoning, experiments
References
Burgers, C., de Graaf, A., & Callaars, S
(2012) Differences in actual persuasiveness between experiential and professional expert evidence. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 1(2), 194–208. 
Cohen, J.A
(1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
Entman, R.M
(1993) Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
Faul F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A
(2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.
Goodall, C.E., Slater, M.D., & Myers, T.A
(2013) Fear and anger responses to local news coverage of alcohol-related crimes, accidents, and injuries: Explaining news effects on policy support using a representative sample of messages and people. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 373–392.
Hartman, T.K
(2012) Toll booths on the information superhighway? Policy metaphors in the case of net neutrality. Political Communication, 29(3), 278–298.
Kalmoe, N.P
(2014) Fueling the fire: Violent metaphors, trait aggression, and support for political violence. Political Communication, 31(4), 545–563.
Krennmayr, T
(2011) Metaphor in newspapers. LOT Dissertation Series, 276. Utrecht: LOT.
Krennmayr, T., Bowdle, B.F., Mulder, G., & Steen, G.J
(2014) Economic competition is like auto racing. Building metaphorical schemas when reading text. Metaphor and the Social World, 4(1), 65–89.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lau, R.R., & Schlesinger, M
(2005) Policy frames, metaphorical reasoning, and support for public policies. Political Psychology, 26(1), 77–114.
Nay, C.G., & Brunson, M.W
(2013) A war of words: Do conflict metaphors affect beliefs about managing “unwanted” plants? Societies, 3(2), 158–169.
Ortony, A
(1975) Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. Educational Theory, 25 (1), 45–53.
Peer, E., Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Mueller, P
(2012) Screening participants from previous studies on Amazon Mechanical Turk and Qualtrics. Unpublished manuscript, retrieved from [URL].
Robins, S., & Mayer, R.E
(2000) The metaphor framing effect: Metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas. Discourse Process, 30(1), 57–86.
Rundell, M
(Ed.) (2002) Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners. Oxford: Macmillan.
Scherer, A.M., Scherer, L.D., & Fagerlin, A
(2015) Getting ahead of illness: Using metaphors to influence medical decision making. Medical Decision Making, 35(1), 37–45.
Scheufele, D.A., & Tewksbury, D
(2007) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.
Schön, D
(1979) Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 137–163). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Semino, E
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J.P
(2002) The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419.
Steen, G.J
(2008) The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.
(2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64.
In press). Elaborating, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics.
Steen, G.J., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Steen, G.J., Reijnierse, W.G., & Burgers, C
(2014) When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS ONE, 9(12), e113536.
Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M.W., Raymond, A., & Vig, W
(2000) The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804–829.
Thibodeau, P.H., & Boroditsky, L
(2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782.
(2013) Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961.
Cited by
Cited by 27 other publications
Augé, Anaïs
2022. How visual metaphors can contradict verbal occurrences. Metaphor and the Social World 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff. 
Bilstrup Finsen, Andreas, Gerard J. Steen & Jean H. M. Wagemans
2021. How do scientists criticize the computer metaphor of the brain?. Journal of Argumentation in Context 10:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Bogetić, Ksenija
2017. Language is a ‘Beautiful Creature’, not an ‘Old Fridge’
. Metaphor and the Social World 7:2 ► pp. 190 ff.
Burgers, Christian
2016. Conceptualizing Change in Communication Through Metaphor. Journal of Communication 66:2 ► pp. 250 ff.
Flusberg, Stephen J., Mark Lauria, Samuel Balko & Paul H. Thibodeau
2020. Effects of Communication Modality and Speaker Identity on Metaphor Framing. Metaphor and Symbol 35:2 ► pp. 136 ff.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2023. Pragmatic complexity in metaphor interpretation. Cognition 237 ► pp. 105455 ff.
Hart, Christopher
2018. ‘Riots engulfed the city’: An experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourses of disorder. Discourse & Society 29:3 ► pp. 279 ff.
Hart, Christopher
Kersten, Mike, Cathy R. Cox, Erin A. Van Enkevort & Robert B. Arrowood
2019. The Influence of Money-related Metaphors on Financial Anxiety and Spending. Metaphor and Symbol 34:4 ► pp. 229 ff.
Nacey, Susan, Aletta G. Dorst, Tina Krennmayr, W. Gudrun Reijnierse & Gerard J. Steen
2019. Chapter 1. MIPVU in multiple languages. In Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 22], ► pp. 2 ff.
Poppi, Fabio & Peter Kravanja
2019. Sic vita est: Visual representation in painting of the conceptual metaphor LIFE IS A JOURNEY
. Semiotica 2019:230 ► pp. 541 ff.
Poppi, Fabio I. M., Marianna Bolognesi & Amitash Ojha
2020. Imago Dei: Metaphorical conceptualization of pictorial artworks within a participant-based framework. Semiotica 2020:236-237 ► pp. 349 ff.
Reuchamps, Min, Jeremy Dodeigne & Julien Perrez
2018. Changing your political mind: The impact of a metaphor on citizens’ representations and preferences for federalism. Regional & Federal Studies 28:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
Saneie Moghadam, Maryam & Reza Ghafar Samar
Schnepf, Julia & Ursula Christmann
2023. “Domestic Drama,” “Love Killing,” or “Murder”: Does the Framing of Femicides Affect Readers’ Emotional and Cognitive Responses to the Crime?. Violence Against Women ► pp. 107780122311581 ff.
Steen, Gerard
2017. Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Steen, Gerard J.
2023. Thinking by metaphor, fast and slow: Deliberate Metaphor Theory offers a new model for metaphor and its comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Sullivan, Karen
2022. Anti-Muslim semantic framing by politicians, Facebook groups, and violent extremists. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 476 ff.
Thibodeau, Paul
2017. The function of metaphor framing, deliberate or otherwise, in a social world. Metaphor and the Social World 7:2 ► pp. 270 ff.
Thibodeau, Paul H. & Stephen J. Flusberg
2022. Metaphor and elaboration in context. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 223 ff.
van Poppel, Lotte
2021. The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation 35:1 ► pp. 177 ff.
Van Stee, Stephanie K.
2018. Meta-Analysis of the Persuasive Effects of Metaphorical vs. Literal Messages. Communication Studies 69:5 ► pp. 545 ff.
Vandeleene, Audrey, François Randour, Jérémy Dodeigne, Pauline Heyvaert, Thomas Legein, Julien Perrez & Min Reuchamps
2023. Metaphors, political knowledge and the basic income debate in Belgium. Metaphor and the Social World 13:2 ► pp. 269 ff.
Vogiatzis, Anastasios
2019. Chapter 5. Greek metaphors in the fiscal straightjacket. In Variation in Political Metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 107 ff.
Wilding, Ell, Sara Bartl, Jeannette Littlemore, Maria Clark & Joanne Brooke
2023. A metaphor analysis of older adults' lived experience of household isolation during COVID-19. Frontiers in Communication 7
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.