When people talk about politics, they often employ metaphors, sometimes in extended sequences, in which a metaphorical idea is referred to across a larger segment of discourse (e.g., talk about political debates as wars, boxing matches, or games of chess). Empirical studies from psychology indicate that, at least in some cases, metaphors can have great persuasive value. My primary claim in this article is that many political metaphors in discourse are often understood as instances of allegory. Allegories refer to extended metaphors in which an entire narrative introduces and elaborates upon a metaphorical source domain to present a rich symbolic understanding of people and events. I describe several notable instances of political allegory and go on to suggest that people can readily interpret many of these allegories via ‘embodied simulations’ by which they imagine themselves participating in the very actions referred to in the language. These embodied simulations are automatic and sometimes tap into enduring allegorical themes that have symbolic value within different cultural communities.
(2009) The anthologist. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Barry, C., Brescoll, V., Brownell, K., & Schlesinger, M
(2009) Obesity metaphors: How do beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy?Milbank Quarterly, 871, 7–47.
Beer, F., & De Landtsheer, C
(Eds.) (2004) Metaphorical world politics. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.
Bergen, B
(2012) Louder than words: The new science of how the mind creates meaning. New York: Basic Books.
Bosman, J
(1987) Persuasive effects of political metaphors. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 21, 97–113.
Charteris-Black, J
(2005) Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cialdini, R
(2007) Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: HarperCollins.
Crano, W
(2015) Useful strategies in the war on words. In M. Hanne, W. Crano, & J. Mio (Eds.), Warring with words: Narrative and metaphor in politics (pp.272–288). New York: Psychology Press.
Frost, R
(1979) The poetry of Robert Frost: The collected poems, complete and unabridged. New York: Holt.
Gerrig, R.J
(1993) Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.
Gibbs, R
(1994) Poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R
(2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R
(2011) The allegorical impulse. Metaphor and Symbol, 261, 121–130.
Gibbs, R
(2013) Walking the walk while thinking about the talk: Embodied interpretation of metaphorical narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 421, 363–378.
(2012) Framing political messages with grammar and metaphor. American Scientist, 1001, 478–483.
Mio, J
(1996) Political metaphors and persuasion. In J. Mio & A. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor: Implications and applications (pp.127–146). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Musolff, A
(2004) Metaphor and political discourse. Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Orwell, G
(1945) Animal farm. London: Secker & Warburg.
Ottati, V., Graesser, A., & Rhoads, S
(1999) The effect of metaphor on processing style in a persuasion task: A motivational resonance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 771, 688–697.
Perlman, M., & Gibbs, R
(2013) Drawing motion that isn’t there: Psycholinguistic evidence on the spatial basis of metaphorical motion verbs. In C. Paradis, J. Hudson, & U. Magnusson (Eds.), The construal of spatial meaning: Windows into conceptual space (pp.43–59). New York: Oxford University Press.
Pfaff, K., & Gibbs, R
(1997) Authorial intentions in understanding satirical texts. Poetics, 251, 45–70.
Read, S., Cesa, I., Jones, D., & Collins, N
(1990) When is the federal budget like a baby? Metaphor in political rhetoric. Metaphor and Symbol, 51, 125–149.
Robins, S., & Mayer, R
(2000) The metaphor framing effect: Metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas. Discourse Processes, 301, 57–86.
Santa Ana, O
(2002) Brown tide rising: Metaphors of Latinos in contemporary American public discourse. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Thibodeau, P., & Boroditsky, L
(2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782.
Wilson, N., & Gibbs, R
(2007) Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 311, 721–731.
Cited by
Cited by 42 other publications
Allott, Nicholas
2019. Scientific Tractability and Relevance Theory. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ► pp. 29 ff.
Barceló, Axel & Robert J. Stainton
2019. Quasi-Factives and Cognitive Efficiency. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ► pp. 53 ff.
Bezuidenhout, Anne
2019. Noun-Noun Compounds from the Perspective of Relevance Theory. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ► pp. 174 ff.
Blakemore, Diane
2019. Expressive Epithets and Expressive Small Clauses. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ► pp. 137 ff.
Breheny, Richard
2019. Language Processing, Relevance and Questions. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ► pp. 42 ff.
Carston, Robyn
2019. Ad Hoc Concepts, Polysemy and the Lexicon. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ► pp. 150 ff.
Carston, Robyn, Billy Clark & Kate Scott
2019. Introduction. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ► pp. 1 ff.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2017. Conclusion. Metaphor and the Social World 7:1 ► pp. 122 ff.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2019. Animals: Moral Intuition and Moral Reasoning. In Metaphors of Brexit, ► pp. 269 ff.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2019. Cherries on the Cake?. In Metaphors of Brexit, ► pp. 1 ff.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2019. The Metaphors of Boris Johnson. In Metaphors of Brexit, ► pp. 161 ff.
2021. Book review: Jonathan Charteris-Black, Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake. Discourse & Society 32:1 ► pp. 119 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Author Index. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ► pp. 313 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. Subject Index. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ► pp. 314 ff.
[no author supplied]
2019. References. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ► pp. 279 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.