Article published in:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 6:1 (2016) ► pp. 52–78

Follow this path

Conceptual metaphors in writing center online consultations

| University of Kansas
| Educational consultant
This paper examines conceptual metaphor use by graduate-student writing consultants in a university writing center. Our goal was to develop a taxonomy for consultant metaphor in asynchronous online consultations; to find evidence that consultants could produce deliberate metaphors as an instructional strategy when responding asynchronously by e-mail to students and their texts; and to compare these data with Thonus’s (2010) investigation of consultant metaphor use in face-to-face consultations, Results showed that writing consultants trained in the use of strategic metaphors employed them in subsequent consultations. In addition, trained consultants used deliberate, coherent, and systematic metaphors in all six categories of our analysis, and they exploited metaphors students had developed in their writing. In comparison with their pre-training metaphor use, the consultants demonstrated increased metaphor use after training and used metaphors significantly differently from consultants who had received no training. We discuss these results in terms of deliberate vs. non-deliberate metaphor use in writing instruction, and we consider the feasibility and advisability of training writing center consultants to employ metaphors — specifically coherent, systematic metaphors — as vehicles for writing instruction in an online setting.
Keywords: online writing instruction, deliberateness, tutoring, writing center, conceptual metaphors
Published online: 12 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.1.03tho
References
Ahrens, K
(2010) Mapping principles for cognitive metaphors. In G. Low, Z. Todd, A. Deignan, & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world (pp. 185–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baake, K
(2000) Metaphor in the writing center: How to place enthymemes in the solar system. Writing Lab Newsletter, 25(1), 12–16.Google Scholar
Bailey, R
(2003) Conceptual metaphor, language, literature, and pedagogy. Journal of Language and Learning, 1(2), 59–72.Google Scholar
Boers, F
(2000) Metaphor awareness and vocabulary retention. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 553–571. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Applied linguistics perspectives on cross-cultural variation in conceptual metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(4), 231–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brunk-Chavez, B., & Martin, J
(2002) The journey out: Conceptual mapping and the writing process. Academic Exchange Quarterly, Fall, 193–197.Google Scholar
Cameron, L
(1999) Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In L. Cameron & G.D. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 105–132). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2008) Metaphor and talk. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., & Deignan, A
(2003) Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149–160. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R
(2010a) Identifying metaphors in discourse data. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 97–115). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., Low, G.D., & Maslen, R
(2010b) Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 117–146). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Cameron, L., & Stelma, J.H
(2004) Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11, 107–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, S., & Pitcher, R
(2010) Extended metaphors for pedagogy: Using sameness and difference. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 579–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charteris-Black, J
(2012) Forensic deliberations on “purposeful metaphor.” Metaphor & The Social World, 2(1), 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A
(2006) The grammar of linguistic metaphors. In A. Stefanowitsch & S.T. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 106–122). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2010) The cognitive view of metaphor: Conceptual metaphor theory. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 44–56). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
(2011) Deliberateness is not unique to metaphor: A response to Gibbs. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 57–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar-Wells, R
(1999) The relevance of metaphor to effective voice teaching strategies. Australian Voice, 51, 50–59.Google Scholar
Elbow, P., & Belanoff, P
(1999) Sharing and responding (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Erman, B
(2007) Cognitive processes as evidence of the idiom principle. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(1), 25–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eubanks, P
(2011) Metaphor and writing: Figurative thought in the discourse of written communication. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Bowdle, B.F
(2001) Convention, form, and figurative language processing. Metaphor and Symbol, 16(3&4), 223–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Jr
(1999) Researching metaphor. In L. Cameron & G.D. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 29–47). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language, 211, 434–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011a) Are “deliberate” metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011b) Author’s response: Advancing the debate on deliberate metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 67–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., Lima, P.L.C., & Francozo, E
(2004) Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 361, 1189–1210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goatly, A
(2011) The language of metaphors (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gorman, R., & Eastman, G.S
(2010) “I see what you mean”: Using visuals to teach metaphoric thinking in reading and writing. English Journal, 100(1), 92–99.Google Scholar
Hewett, B
(2015) The online writing conference: A guide for teachers and consultants. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Hiraga, M.K
(2005) Metaphor and iconicity: A cognitive approach to analyzing texts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holme, R
(2004) Mind, metaphor, and language teaching. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kathpalia, S.S., & Carmel, H.L.H
(2011) Metaphorical competence in ESL student writing. RELC Journal, 421, 273–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kalyuga, M., & Kalyuga, S
(2008) Metaphor awareness in teaching vocabulary. Language Learning Journal, 361, 249–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lai, V.T., Curran, T., & Menn, L
(2009) Comprehending conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study. Brain Research, 12841, 145–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Thinking points: Communicating our American values and vision. New York: Farrar, Strauss, & Giroux.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lambkin, B
(2012) Migration as a metaphor for metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World, 2(2), 180–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langston, W
(2002) Violating orientational metaphors slows reading. Discourse Processes, 341, 281–310. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, T., & Wagner, T
(2006) In their own words: Understanding student conceptions of writing through their spontaneous metaphors in the science classroom. Instructional Science, 341, 227–278. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., Krennmayr, T., Turner, J., & Turner, S
(2014) An investigation into metaphor use at different levels of second language writing. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 117–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Low, G.D
(2006a) Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006b) Metaphoric competence, second language learning, and communicative language ability. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 268–294. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Low, G.D
(1999) “This paper thinks…” Investigating the acceptability of the metaphor an essay is a person. In L. Cameron & G.D. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 221–247). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Low, G.D., Littlemore, J., & Koester, A
(2008) Metaphor use in three UK university lectures. Applied Linguistics, 291, 428–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Low, G.D., & Todd, Z
(2010) Good practice in metaphor analysis: Guidelines and pitfalls. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 217–229). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Mashal, N., & Faust, M
(2009) Conventionalisation of novel metaphors: A shift in hemispheric asymmetry. Laterality, 14(6), 573–589. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miles, L., Gormley, M., Volpe, C.F., Roche, C., Hays, E., & Amidon, S
(2001) Exploring multiple intelligences in the writing center. Writing Lab Newsletter, 26(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
Müller, C
(2011) Are “deliberate” metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 61–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrie, H.G
(1993) Metaphor and learning. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (1st ed.) (pp. 438–461). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrie, H.G., & Oshlag, R.S
(1999) Metaphor and learning. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 579–609). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pugh, S
(1992) Bridging: A teacher’s guide to metaphorical thinking. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
Reddy, M.J
(1993) The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 164–201). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, P
(1997) The rule of metaphor: Multidisciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language. (R. Czerny, K. McLaughlin, & J. Costello, Trans.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, S
(2010) Bringing it all together: Applying metaphor analysis to online discussions in a doctorate study. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 230–247). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Ronesi, L
(2009) Theory in/to practice: Multilingual tutors supporting multilingual peers. Writing Center Journal, 29(2), 75–95.Google Scholar
Schmitt, R
(2005) Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394. Retrieved from http://​www​.nova​.edu​/ssss​/QR​/QR10​-2​/schmitt​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Semino, E
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, D., & Mahlios, M
(2014) Adult literacy students’ metaphors of reading and writing. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 3(1), 21–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B
(2010)  Ships in the night: A study of conceptual metaphor use for teaching first-year writing . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 3485928.
Steen, G.J
(2011) What does “really deliberate” really mean? Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 53–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S.T
(2006) Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs, 1711, 63–105.Google Scholar
Tendahl, M
(2009) A hybrid theory of metaphor: Relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thonus, T
(2002) Tutor and student assessments of academic writing tutorials: What is “success”? Assessing Writing, 81, 110–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) What are the differences? Tutor interactions with first- and second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 131, 227–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010)  Metaphorical language in writing center consultations . International Writing Centers Association, Baltimore, MD 5 November.Google Scholar
Villamil, O.S., & de Guerrero, M.C.M
(2005) Constructing theoretical notions of L2 writing through metaphor conceptualization. In N. Bartels (Ed.), Applied linguistics and language teacher education (pp. 79–90). New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, M.E
(2003) Transcending “conversing”: A deaf student in the writing center. In C. Murphy & S. Sherwood (Eds.), The St. Martin’s sourcebook for writing consultants (2nd ed.) (pp. 221–232). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Williams, J., & Severino, C
(2004) The writing center and second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 165–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willox, A.C., Harper, S.L., Bridger, D., Morton, S., Orbach, A., & Sarapura, S
(2010) Co-creating metaphor in the classroom for deeper learning: Graduate student reflections. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 221, 71–79.Google Scholar
Yu, N
(2008) Metaphor from body and culture. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Hewett, Beth L. & Terese Thonus
2019. Online Metaphorical Feedback and Students’ Textual Revisions: An Embodied Cognitive Experience. Computers and Composition 54 ► pp. 102512 ff. Crossref logo
Khatin-Zadeh, Omid & Hooshang Khoshsima
2021. Homo-schematic Metaphors: A Study of Metaphor Comprehension in Three Different Priming Conditions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 50:4 ► pp. 923 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.