Article published in:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 6:2 (2016) ► pp. 225–242

The mind is an ecosystem

Systemic metaphors promote systems thinking

| Oberlin College
| Purchase College
Is income inequality more of a blemish or a failing organ in our economy? Both metaphors capture something about wealth disparities, but only failing organ seems to emphasize the fact that our economy is a complex system, where activity in one region may lead to a cascade of problems in other parts of the system. In the present study, we introduce a novel method for classifying such ‘systemic’ metaphors, which reveals that people can reliably identify the extent to which a metaphor highlights the complex causal structure of a target domain. In a second experiment, we asked whether exposing people to more systemic metaphors would induce a systems-thinking mindset and influence reasoning on a seemingly unrelated task that measured the degree to which people reasoned about a domain in terms of complex causal relations. We found that participants who were primed with systemic metaphors scored higher on subsequent tasks that measured relational and holistic thinking, supporting the view that these metaphors can promote systems thinking. Our discussion highlights the potential role of systemic metaphors in facilitating reasoning and decision-making in complex domains.
Keywords: systems thinking, decision-making, metaphor, analogy, intervention, framing
Published online: 20 October 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.2.03thi
References

References

Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K.
(2010) Do English and Mandarin speakers think differently about time? Cognition, 118, 123–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T.L.
(2003) Making truth: Metaphor in science. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Capra, F.
(1985) Criteria of systems thinking. Futures, 17, 475–478. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Checkland, P.B.
(1972) Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem solving. Journal of Systems Engineering, 3, 87–116.Google Scholar
Choi, I., Dalal, R., Kim-Prieto, C., & Park, H.
(2003) Culture and judgment of causal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 46–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Choi, I., Koo, M., & Choi, J.A.
(2007) Individual differences in analytic versus holistic thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 691–705. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H.
(1973) Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, A.C., & Stroink, M.L.
(2015) The relationship between systems thinking and the new ecological paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. Available online pre-publication: http://​onlinelibrary​.wiley​.com​/doi​/10​.1002​/sres​.2371​/full. DOI: Crossref
Dweck, C.
(2006) Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House LLC.Google Scholar
Flusberg, S.J., Thibodeau, P.H., Sternberg, D.A., & Glick, J.J.
(2010) A connectionist approach to embodied conceptual metaphor. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D.
(1983) Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gick, M.L. & Holyoak, K.J.
(1980) Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, D.J., & Schwarz, N.
(2014) The war on prevention bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 66–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(2002) Moral politics: How conservatives and liberals think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Landau, M.J., Sullivan, D., & Greenberg, J.
(2009) Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 20, 1421–1427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maani, K.E., & Maharaj, V.
(2004) Links between systems thinking and complex decision making. System Dynamics Review, 20, 21–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maddux, W.W., & Yuki, M.
(2006) The “ripple effect”: Cultural differences in perceptions of the consequences of events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 669–683. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R.E.
(2006) Culture and change blindness. Cognitive Science, 30, 381–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A.
(2001) Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pennebaker, J.W., Chung, C.K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R.J.
(2007) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. Austin, TX: LIWC. Net.Google Scholar
Richmond, B.
(1993) Systems thinking – critical thinking skills for the 1990s and beyond. System Dynamics Review, 9, 113–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rottman, B.M., Gentner, D., & Goldwater, M.B.
(2012) Causal systems categories: Differences in novice and expert categorization of causal phenomena. Cognitive science, 36, 919–932. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F.
(2002) The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.J., Reijnierse, W.G., & Burgers, C.
(2014) When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PloS ONE, 9(12), e113536. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, E.
(1911) The scattering of α and β particles by matter and the structure of the atom. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 21, 669–688. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, L.B., & Sterman, J.
(2007) Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. Systems Dynamics Review, 23, 285–312. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P.H., & Boroditsky, L.
(2011) Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Measuring effects of metaphor in a dynamic opinion landscape. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133939. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E.C.
(1978) On the expression of spatiotemporal relations in language. In J.H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language, vol. 3, Word structure (pp. 369–400). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vendetti, M.S., Wu, A., & Holyoak, K.J.
(2014) Far-out thinking: Generating solutions to distant analogies promotes relational thinking. Psychological Science, 25, 928–933. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, P., & Gentner, D.
(2011) Structure mapping in metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 35, 1456–1488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Beger, Anke & Thomas H. Smith
2020.  In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Lezak, Stephen B. & Paul H. Thibodeau
2016. Systems thinking and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Psychology 46 ► pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Smith, Thomas H.
2020.  In How Metaphors Guide, Teach and Popularize Science [Figurative Thought and Language, 6], ► pp. 211 ff. Crossref logo
Thibodeau, Paul H., Cynthia McPherson Frantz & Matias Berretta
2017. The earth is our home: systemic metaphors to redefine our relationship with nature. Climatic Change 142:1-2 ► pp. 287 ff. Crossref logo
Thibodeau, Paul H., Rose K. Hendricks & Lera Boroditsky
2017. How Linguistic Metaphor Scaffolds Reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21:11 ► pp. 852 ff. Crossref logo
Walsh-Childers, Kim & Jennifer Braddock
2021. Costs, Evidence, Context and Values: Journalists’ and Policy Experts’ Recommendations for U.S. Health Policy Coverage. Health Communication ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.