Non-conventional figurative language as aesthetics of everyday communication
This study focuses on the emotional aesthetic appreciation of figurative language, a dimension which has often been neglected in experimental psycholinguistics. Our goal was to demonstrate that non-conventional figurative utterances are evaluated as more aesthetically pleasing although they are cognitively more demanding than conventional rhetorical figures. This hypothesis was tested for three main types of figurative language (metaphors, irony and idioms) in three separate surveys. Participants assessed utterances by means of a questionnaire which comprised several semantic differential items. The postulated covariation of non-conventionality and cognitive effort as well as of non-conventionality and aesthetics could be clearly established for metaphors and for irony. For idioms we could only partially provide this evidence. However, in a combined sample for all figurative language forms (compiled from the three studies) the main hypothesis was again confirmed. Thus, the results demonstrate that non-conventional variants of figurative language must be considered as the core of figurative aesthetics. Furthermore, our exploratory data gave evidence of an aesthetic paradox: the cognitive costs of understanding conventional figurative language reduce aesthetic pleasure, while in the case of non-conventional rhetoric figures the enhanced cognitive effort is accompanied by an increase in aesthetic pleasure.
Keywords: figurative language, aesthetic pleasure, cognitive effort, (nonL)conventionality, emotional-aesthetic appreciation, aesthetic paradox
Published online: 20 October 2016
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G.
Bauer, D.J., & Curran, P.J.
Blasko, D.G., & Connine, C.M.
Bohrn, I.C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A.M.
Brisard, F., Frisson, S., & Sandra, D.
Brône, G., & Coulson, S.
Burgers, C., van Mulken, M., & Schellens, P.J.
Chang, C.-T., & Yen, C.-T.
Chiappe, D.L., Kennedy, J.M., & Chiappe, P.
Christmann, U., & Mischo, C.
Christmann, U., Wimmer, L., & Groeben, N.
Giora, R., Drucker, A., Fein, O., & Mendelson, I.
Giora, R., & Fein, O.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N., & Zur, A.
Groeben, N., & Scheele, B.
Hunt, R.A., & Vipond, D.
Johnson, P.O., & Neyman, J.
Jones, L.L., & Estes, Z.
Katz, A.N., & Ferretti, T.R.
Kronrod, A., & Danziger, S.
Lagerwerf, L., & Meijers, A.
McQuarrie, E.F., & Mick, D.G.
Miall, D.S., & Kuiken, D.
Nerlich, B., & Clarke, D.D.
Pexman, P.M., Ferretti, T.R., & Katz, A.N.
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P.
Schwoebel, J., Dews, S., Winner, E., & Srinivas, K.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R.J.
Van Enschot, R., & Hoeken, H.
Van Mulken, M., Le Pair, R., & Forceville, C.
Van Mulken, M., van Enschot-van Dijk, R., & Hoeken, H.
Van Mulken, M., van Hooft, A., & Nederstigt, U.
Van Peer, W.
Vorderer, P., & Roth, F.S.
(1969) Problems in the analysis of idioms. In J. Puhvel (Ed.), Substance and structure of language: Lectures delivered before the Linguistic Institute of the Linguistic Society of America, University of California, Los Angeles, June 17 – August 12, 1966 (pp. 23–82). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
(2015) Das ästhetische Paradox bei der Verarbeitung von fiktionalen vs. nicht-fiktionalen Texten [The aesthetic paradox in processing fictional vs. non-fictional texts] (Doctoral thesis, University of Heidelberg, Germany). Retrieved from http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/18232/
Cited by 2 other publications
Kronrod, Ann, Mary E. Hammar, JongSoo Lee, Herpreet K. Thind & Kelsey M. Mangano
Lerche, Veronika, Ursula Christmann & Andreas Voss
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.