Article published in:
Metaphor in Religion and Spirituality
Edited by Stephen Pihlaja
[Metaphor and the Social World 7:1] 2017
► pp. 5–25

The light within

Metaphor consistency in Quaker pamphlets, 1659–2010

| Lancaster University, UK
This paper contributes to the study of religious metaphor by combining discourse analysis with cognitive semantics. In particular, it engages in a diachronic study of 30 pamphlets written by British Quakers and addressed to the general public to investigate the consistency of metaphor use in that genre across three and a half centuries. Consistency is seen as metaphors recording the same source domains and/or scenarios and/or lexical realisations across time, with maximum consistency meeting all three criteria.Utilising the notions of genre and discourse community along with metaphor domains and scenarios, the analysis shows that among 19 metaphor domains that occur in texts from at least two different centuries, just under 60 per cent are highly or maximally consistent, with domains of maximum consistency being the largest group. The changing purposes of the pamphlet genre and the evolving social and historical contexts do not diminish this long-term metaphor consistency.This overall finding is explained with recourse to the dual-processing/representation theory of religious cognition, which posits a difference between theological and basic everyday representations and processing of God concepts. Quakerism shows an overall lack of abstract theology, with Quakers instead establishing various metaphors for God to express their lived experience of the divine. The remarkable consistency of metaphors in Quaker pamphlets suggests that Quakerism makes God concepts intuitively meaningful and relevant.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.History and beliefs of British Quakers
  • 3.Metaphor in the language of Quakers
  • 4.A model for analysing metaphor consistency
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.7.1.02kol
References
Anonymous
(c.2006) Quakers: The Religious Society of Friends. London: Friends Meeting House.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. L.
(2000) Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 29–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Cognitive science of religion: Looking back, looking forward. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50(2), 229–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C.
(1996) Anthropomorphism and God concepts: Conceptualizing a non-natural entity. Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 219–247. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R.
(1970) Aspects of 17th century Quaker rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 631, 67–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boeve, L., & Feyaerts, K.
(eds.) (1999) Metaphor and God-talk. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chandler, W., Pyot, A., Hodges, J. et al.
(1693/1739) A brief apology in behalf of the people, in derision, call’d, Quakers. Written for the information of our sober and well-inclined neighbours. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: William Cuthbert. Available at http://​quod​.lib​.umich​.edu​/e​/evans​/n01698​.0001​.001​?rgn​=main;view​=fulltext, accessed 26 July 2016.
Charteris-Black, J.
(2004) Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, P. & Kopytowska, M.
eds. forthcoming Religious language, metaphor and the human mind New York Oxford University Press
Creasey, M. A.
(1962) “Inward” and “outward”: A study in early Quaker language. London: Friends Historical Society.Google Scholar
Crystal, D.
forthcoming). Whatever happened to theolinguistics? In P. Chilton, & M. Kopytowska eds Religious language, metaphor and the human mind New York Oxford University Press Available at http://​www​.davidcrystal​.com​/?id​=4787​&fromsearch​=true accessed 26 July 2016 Crossref
Dandelion, P.
(2007) An introduction to Quakerism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DesCamp, M. T. & Sweetser, E. E.
(2005) Metaphors for God: Why and how do our choices matter for humans? The application of contemporary cognitive linguistics research to the debate on God and metaphor. Pastoral Psychology, 53(3), 207–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, H.
(2007) Consider the blackbird: Reflections on spirituality and language. Wallingford, PA: Quaker Books.Google Scholar
Graves, M. P.
(2009) Preaching the inward light: Early Quaker rhetoric. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, S.
(c.2010) So, who are these Quakers anyway? Available at http://​www​.aboutquakers​.org​.uk/, accessed 26 July 2016.
Guthrie, S.
(1980) A cognitive theory of religion. Current Anthropology, 21(2), 181–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hibbert, G. K.
(1941) Quaker fundamentals. London: Friends Home Service Committee.Google Scholar
Hinds, H.
(2011) George Fox and early Quaker culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, J.
(2009) The Quaker enterprise of metaphor. Quaker Theology, 161. Available at http://​quakertheology​.org​/issue16​-hodson01​.htm, accessed 26 July 2016.
Jäkel, O.
(2002) Hypotheses revisited: The cognitive theory of metaphor applied to religious texts. metaphorik.de, 021, 20–42.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2003) Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kripal, J. J.
(2014) Comparing religions. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Leech, D., & Visala, A.
(2011) The cognitive science of religion: Implications for theism? Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 46(1), 47–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacQuarrie, J.
(1967) God-talk: An examination of the language and logic of theology. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Masson, R.
(2014) Without metaphor, no saving God: Theology after cognitive linguistics. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
McFague, S.
(1982) Metaphorical theology: Models of God in religious language. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Moore, R. A.
(2000) The light in their consciences: Early Quakers in Britain 1646–1666. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Musolff, A.
(2006) Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nørager, T.
(1999) ‘Heart’ as a metaphor in religious discourse. In L. Boeve, & K. Feyaerts (eds), Metaphor and God-talk (pp. 216–232). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Outreach Committee
(2000) Your guide to Quakers. London: Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) in Britain.Google Scholar
Penington, I.
(n.d.). Concerning the sum and substance of our religion, who are called Quakers. In The works of the long-mournful and sorely-distressed Isaac Penington etc. (pp. 441–455). Vol. 21. Glenside, PA: Quaker Heritage Press 1995–97 Available at http://​www​.qhpress​.org​/texts​/penington​/substance​.html, accessed 26 July 2016.
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Punshon, J.
(2006) Portrait in grey: A short history of the Quakers. Wallingford, PA: Quaker Books.Google Scholar
Soriano, C.
(2015) Emotion and conceptual metaphor. In H. Flam, & J. Kleres (eds), Methods of Exploring Emotions (pp. 206–214). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soskice, J. M.
(1985) Metaphor and religious language. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tremlin, T.
(2006) Minds and gods: The cognitive foundations of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Noppen, J. P.
(Ed.) (1983) Metaphor and religion. (Theolinguistics 2). Brussels: VU of Brussels.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ringrow, Helen
2020. “I can feel myself being squeezed and stretched, moulded and grown, and expanded in my capacity to love loudly and profoundly”: Metaphor and religion in motherhood blogs. Discourse, Context & Media 37 ► pp. 100429 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.