The role of context in the formation of hejab ‘veiling’ metaphors in hejab billboards and posters in Iran
Proper
hejab observance has long been an important issue to political-religious conservatives in Iran who, in recent years, have relied on metaphorical language to persuade Iranian women to dress modestly in public. The present paper, based on
Kövecses’s (2015) account of metaphor in context, explores the role of contextual factors involved in the formation of
hejab linguistic metaphors used in 56 pro-
hejab billboards and posters. Data analysis indicates that the moral and social status of women are depicted as being determined by, or correlated with, their degree of veiling. On that basis, properly covered up women are shown to be the recipients of very positive metaphorical conceptualizations (as
pearls,
flowers, and
angels), whereas immodestly dressed women are negatively pictured as being subject to sexual objectification (as
unwrapped edibles). Moreover, the
hejab is a protective cover is shown to be the metaphor instantiated in many of the billboards and posters. The protective function of
hejab is highlighted by conceptualizing corrupt men as
flies and
devils. Finally, the metaphorical patterns represent the contextual role of political and religious ideology, key cultural concepts, and show entrenched conventional conceptual metaphors and metonymies in the production of novel metaphors.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Framing hejab
- 2.1
Mahram vs. nâmahram
- 2.2
Effat ‘chastity’
- 2.3Clothes
- 2.4Make-up
- 2.5Color
- 2.6Sex, desire, and love
- 3.Metaphor and context
- 3.1Situational context
- 3.2Discourse context
- 3.3Cognitive-conceptual context
- 3.4Bodily context
- 4.Data and methodology
- 5.Results
- 6.
Hejab metaphors
- 6.1Metaphors representing hejab as a protective cover
- 6.1.1Metaphors representing the social significance of ‘hejab’
- 6.1.2Metaphors representing the political-religious significance of ‘hejab’
- 6.1.3Metaphors praising women and ‘hejab’
- 6.1.4Metaphors representing the significance of ‘hejab’ in family life
- 6.2Metaphors related to men’s gaze
- 6.3
Hejab and spiritual life
- 6.4
Hejab as a national and political symbol
- 6.5
Hejab statements to refute anti-hejab arguments
- 7.Hejab metaphors in context
- 7.1Situational context
- 7.2Discourse context
- 7.3Conceptual-cognitive context
- 7.4Bodily context
- 8.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
This article is currently available as a sample article.
References (36)
References
Ahmed, L. (1992). Women and gender in Islam. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, J. (2007). The communication of leadership. London & New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chilton, P., & Lakoff, G. (1995). Foreign policy by metaphor. In C. Schafner & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace. (pp. 37–60). Aldershot: Ashgate.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Farahani, F. (2002). The absent presence: Reflections on the discursive practice of veiling. In I. Hartel & S. Schade (Eds.), The body and representation (pp. 99–106). Hanover: International Women’s University. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ghahramani, M. (2016). Zan be masabeh e sandanli [women as chairs]. Retrieved from [URL], 04/02/2016.
Gould, R. (2014). Hijab as commodity form: Veiling, unveiling, and misveiling in contemporary Iran. Feminist Theory, 15(3), 221–240. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hessini, L. (1994). Wearing the hijab in contemporary Morocco: Choice and identity. In F. M. Gocek & S. Balaghi (Eds.), Reconstructing gender in the Middle East: Tradition, identity, and power (pp. 40–57). New York: Colombia University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoodfar, H. (2003). The veil in their minds and on our heads: Veiling practices and Muslim women’. In: L. Lowe & D. Lloyd (Eds.), The politics of culture in the shadow of capital (pp. 248–279). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hovsepian-Bearce, Y. (2015). The political ideology of Ayatollah Khamenei: Out of the mouth of the supreme leader of Iran. London & New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hume, L. (2013). The religious life of dress: Global fashion and faith. London & New York: Bloomsbury. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khir Allah, G. (2015). Veiling and revealing identity: The linguistic representation of the hijab in the British press. In M. C. La Barbera (Ed), Identity and migration in Europe: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 229–250). New York & London: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z. (2006). Language, mind, and culture: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Milani, F. (1992). Veils and words: The emerging voices of Iranian women writers. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mir-Hosseini, Z. (2007). The politics and hermeneutics of hijab in Iran: From confinement to choice. Muslim World Journal of Human Rights, 4(1), 50–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Naghibi, N. (1999). Bad feminist or Bad-Hejabi? Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 1(4), 555–571. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nakanishi, H. (1998). Power, ideology, and women’s consciousness in post-revolutionary Iran. In H. L. Bodman & N. Tohidi (Eds.), Women in Muslim societies: Diversity within unity (pp. 83–100). Boulder & London: Lynne Riener Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nanda, S., & Warms, R. (2013). Cultural anthropology. Belmont: Cengage Learning.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rahmatha, S., Chambersb, L., & Wakewichc, P. (2016). Asserting citizenship: Muslim women’s experiences with the hijab in Canada. Women’s Studies International Forum. 581, 34–40. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sardar, Z. (2011). Reading the Quran: The contemporary relevance of the sacred text of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sedghi, H. (2007). Women and politics in Iran: Veiling, unveiling, and revealing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vakili, S. (2011). Women and politics in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Action and reaction. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and context: A socio-cognitive approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Voss, N. (2011). The female body as political blackmail: Women, body image and revolution in Iran. Retrieved from [URL].
Wahid Khorasani, Sh. H. (2014). Islamic laws. Newington, UK: Yasin Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Watson, H. (1994). Women and the veil: Personal responses to global process. In A. S. Ahmed & H. Donnan (Eds.), Islam, globalization and postmodernity (pp. 141–159). London & New York: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, R. H., & Vashi, G. (2007). “Hijab” and American Muslim women: Creating the space for autonomous selves. Sociology of Religion, 68(3), 269–287. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zinken, J. (2003). Ideological imagination: Intertextual and correlational metaphors in political discourse. Discourse and Society, 14(4), 507–523. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Mobarki, Yahya Abdu A. & Fahad Alzahrani
2024.
Sports fanaticism as a disease: a Corpus-based study of metaphors in Saudi newspapers.
Frontiers in Psychology 14
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.