Metaphor frames highlight certain aspects of a target domain and deemphasize others, thereby encouraging specific patterns of inference. A recent series of studies (Reijnierse, Burgers, Krennmayr, & Steen, 2015; Steen, Reijnierse, & Burgers, 2014), however, raises questions about the role of metaphor in communication and reasoning by (a) failing to find metaphor framing effects on a series of policy judgments, (b) critiquing the methods that have been used to test for metaphor framing effects, and (c) arguing that current theories of metaphor processing fail to consider the social-pragmatic dimension of metaphor in communication. Here, I reflect on these concerns and present novel analyses of data collected by Steen and colleagues, which reveal metaphor framing effects in these studies but fail to support a prediction of Deliberate Metaphor Theory (DMT): that extended metaphors are more likely to be remembered. DMT attempts to situate metaphor framing effects more intentionally along a social-pragmatic dimension; developing and testing the theory was a primary motivation of the studies conducted by Steen and colleagues. I discuss the implications of these findings and offer a perspective on how DMT can help grow our knowledge of the function of metaphor in a social world.
Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and language development, pp. 279–362. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Black, M. (1962). Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1–28.
Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently?Cognition, 118(1), 123–129.
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193.
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717–726.
Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2007). Interactions between attention and memory. Current opinion in neurobiology, 17(2), 177–184.
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170.
Gibbs, R. W. (1996). Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition, 61(3), 309–319.
Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 481, 529–562.
Gibbs, R. W. (2013). The real complexities of psycholinguistic research on metaphor. Language Sciences, 401, 45–52.
Gibbs, R. W. (2015a). Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future?Journal of Pragmatics, 901, 73–76.
Gibbs, R. W. (2015b). Do pragmatic signals affect conventional metaphor understanding? A failed test of Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 901, 77–87.
Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphor to idioms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2014). The war on prevention bellicose cancer metaphors hurt (some) prevention intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 66–77.
Howell, D. (2012). Statistical methods for psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Jia, L., & Smith, E. R. (2013). Distance makes the metaphor grow stronger: A psychological distance model of metaphor use. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 492–497.
Keefer, L. A., Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2011). Exploring metaphor’s epistemic function: Uncertainty moderates metaphor-consistent priming effects on social perceptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 657–660.
Keysar, B., & Bly, B. (1995). Intuitions of the transparency of idioms: Can one keep a secret by spilling the beans?Journal of Memory and Language, 34(1), 89–109.
Keysar, B., Shen, Y., Glucksberg, S., & Horton, W. S. (2000). Conventional language: How metaphorical is it?Journal of Memory and Language, 43(4), 576–593.
Krennmayr, T. (2011). Metaphor in newspapers. Amsterdam: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Landau, M. J., Keefer, L. A., & Rothschild, Z. K. (2014). Epistemic motives moderate the effect of metaphoric framing on attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 531, 125–138.
Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D., & Greenberg, J. (2009). Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1421–1427.
McGuire, W. J. (2000). Standing on the shoulders of ancients: Consumer research, persuasion, and figurative language. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), 109–114.
Menard, S. (2002). Applied logistic regression analysis (Vol. 1061). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Nash, J. M. (2000). “The new science of Alzheimer’s: Racing against time – and one another – researchers close in on the aging brain’s most heartbreaking disorder.” Time Magazine. Retrieved (January 29, 2016) from: [URL]
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231.
Ottati, V., Rhoads, S., & Graesser, A. C. (1999). The effect of metaphor on processing style in a persuasion task: A motivational resonance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(4), 688–697.
Robins, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). The metaphor framing effect: Metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas. Discourse Processes, 30(1), 57–86.
Rumelhart, D. E. (1979). Some problems with the notion of literal meanings. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 71–82). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J. P. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419.
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.
Steen, G. J. (2009). Deliberate metaphor affords conscious metaphorical cognition. Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 179–197.
Steen, G. J. (2015). Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 901, 67–72.
Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PloS ONE, 9(12), e113536.
Thibodeau, P. H. (2016). Extended metaphors are the home run of persuasion: Don’t fumble the phrase. Metaphor & Symbol, 31(2), 53–72.
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782.
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PloS ONE, 8(1), e52961.
Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2015). Measuring effects of metaphor in a dynamic opinion landscape. PloS ONE, 10(7), e0133939.
Thibodeau, P., & Durgin, F. H. (2008). Productive figurative communication: Conventional metaphors facilitate the comprehension of related novel metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 521–540.
Thibodeau, P.H., & Durgin, F.H. (2011). Metaphor aptness and conventionality: A processing fluency account. Metaphor and Symbol, 261, 206–226.
Traugott, E. C. (1978). On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson, & E. A. Moravcsik (Eds.), Universals of human language: Word structure, Vol. 31 (pp. 369–400). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cited by (21)
Cited by 21 other publications
Allan, Catherine
2024. Helping scientists reflect on their relationship with rivers via frames. River Research and Applications 40:9 ► pp. 1710 ff.
Chinn, Sedona, Dan Hiaeshutter-Rice, P. Sol Hart & Brendon M.H. Larson
2024. Testing How Militaristic and Xenophobic Language Affects Engagement with Facebook Posts about Invasive Species. Environmental Communication 18:3 ► pp. 351 ff.
Gonçalves, Isabella
2024. Promoting Hate Speech by Dehumanizing Metaphors of Immigration. Journalism Practice 18:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
Kwaramba, Christopher S, Susan Meyer Goldstein, Paul Benjamin Lowry, Quinton J Nottingham & Erica F Cooper
2024. Supply Chain Resilience as Endotherm Resilience: Theorizing Through Metaphorical Transfer. Production and Operations Management 33:2 ► pp. 456 ff.
Roberts, India M. S. & Marianna M. Bolognesi
2024. The Influence of Metaphorical Framing on Emotions and Reasoning About the COVID-19 Pandemic. Metaphor and Symbol 39:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Trojszczak, Marcin
2024. Expressing negative opinions through metaphor and simile in popular music reviews. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
2023. A Detailed Overview of Theory: CDA, Ecolinguistics and Metaphor. In The Politics of Climate Change Metaphors in the U.S. Discourse, ► pp. 27 ff.
Alarcón-Hermosilla, Salvador, Neil Nehring & Javier Campos Calvo Sotelo
2023. Drowned, Washed Up, and Left for Dead: Hyperbolic Irreverence in “Jumpin’ Jack Flash”. Rock Music Studies 10:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Rossi, Micaela
2023. Métaphores de la lutte: variations dans les corpus francophones. In Le français au prisme de sa diversité [LCM - La Collana / The Series, ],
Zhang, Yan & Wenxing Yang
2023. The landslide’s conceptualizing economic decline and its framing effect: Mandarin evidence. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Kristensson, Per, Jonas Hjalmar Blom & Erik Wästlund
2022. Behavior Change: Five Ways to Facilitate Co-creation of Service for a Better World. In The Palgrave Handbook of Service Management, ► pp. 303 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.