In the construction of an academic thesis, the lived and multi-voiced experiences of fieldwork have to be condensed and distilled into a single, coherent narrative thread. This article discusses the problematic and delicate situation of attempting to select (and thereby exclude) materials and stories, and of representing faithfully but through analytical lenses, while juggling the intricacies of the author’s own positionalities and multiple levels of interpretation. In its discussion, this article makes explicit the complications of translating and transposing lived encounters and experiences into text and the written word, and unpacks the inexorable exercise of power involved in this process.
2022. Responsibility, Recognition, and Representation: The Ethical Bases of Truth Evaluation in Political Narrative Analysis. Political Psychology 43:3 ► pp. 549 ff.
Eriksson Baaz, Maria & Mats Utas
2019. Exploring the Backstage: Methodological and Ethical Issues Surrounding the Role of Research Brokers in Insecure Zones. Civil Wars 21:2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Lu, Hangyan & Warren A. Hodge
2019. Toward multi-dimensional and developmental notion of researcher positionality. Qualitative Research Journal 19:3 ► pp. 225 ff.
Leese, Maggie
2016. The bumpy road to ‘becoming’: capturing the stories that teenage mothers told about their journey into motherhood. Child & Family Social Work 21:4 ► pp. 521 ff.
Leese, Maggie
2017. Engaging on the ‘front line’: exploring how family support teams construct meaning in their work with young mothers. Child & Family Social Work 22:3 ► pp. 1207 ff.
MacKenzie, Catrina A, Julia Christensen & Sarah Turner
2015. Advocating beyond the academy: dilemmas of communicating relevant research results. Qualitative Research 15:1 ► pp. 105 ff.
Heaphy, Brian & Anna Einarsdottir
2013. Scripting Civil Partnerships: interviewing couples together and apart. Qualitative Research 13:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Onuora, Adwoa Ntozake
2013. HERstory Is OURstory. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 13:5 ► pp. 400 ff.
Herrmann, Andrew F.
2012. “Criteria against Ourselves?”. International Review of Qualitative Research 5:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.