Cover not available
Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 29:1 (2019) ► pp.29–49

Letter to a grandchild as a narrative tool of older adults’ biographical experience exploration

| Pedagogical University of Krakow
| Warsaw University
| Warsaw University
The paper purports to present a method that allows to obtain and analyze letters written by older adults to their real or imaginary grandchildren. This enables an insight into their individual life experience. The study used a narrative paradigm. Letter texts were obtained from 128 older adults from Poland, both male and female. Data was analyzed with mixed methods combining qualitative content analysis (using inductive analytical categories described in originally created Coder Completion Sheet) with frequency count. The analysis allowed a systematic description of content (themes in wisdom legacy) and the differentiation of two major formal patterns in the letters: (1) the narrative mode (storytelling); (2) the argumentative mode (legacy without narrative examples: advice, warnings, and wishes). The outcomes demonstrate the letter technique may be recommended for future research in psychology, narrative gerontology and for used in applied psychology also.
Keywords: narrative approach, letter technique, biographical experience, wisdom transmission
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Design and methods
    • Research group and procedure
    • Letter writing task
    • Data analysis
    • Letter type (see Table 2)
    • Text mode (see Table 2)
    • Time coverage of a story (see Table 2)
    • A period in life (see Table 2)
    • Content type and protagonists (see Table 2)
    • Persuasive function of narrative passages (see Table 2)
    • Elements in the argumentative mode (see Table 2)
    • Rationale (see Table 2)
  • Results
    • Letter types and categorization by mode
    • Text modes
    • Narrative mode analysis
    • Protagonist, social scene and described events
    • Types of persuasive function of narrative passages
    • Argumentative mode analysis
  • Discussion
  • Conclusions
  • References
Published online: 2 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18049.tok
References (37)
References
Allport, G. (1946/ 1965). Letters from Jenny. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Chądzyńska, M., & Dryll, E. (2004). Etos rodzinny – analiza pól semantycznych słów kluczowych w autonarracjach ojców matek i ich dzieci. [Family ethos: Semantic field analysis of key words in narratives of fathers, mothers, and children]. Studia Psychologiczne, 31, 27–42.Google Scholar
Cierpka, A. (2012). Narrative identity in late adulthood. Psychology of Language and Communication, 16(3), 237–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Medeiros, K. (2007). Beyond the memoir: Telling life stories using multiple literary forms. Journal of Aging, Humanities, and the Arts, 3–41, 159–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de St. Aubin, E., McAdams, D. P., & Kim, T.-C. (Eds.). (2004). The generative society: Caring for future generations. Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Draper, B. (2012). Less is more. Spirituality for busy lives. Oxford: Lion Hudson Publishers.Google Scholar
Dryll, E. (2013). Wrastanie w kulturę: Transmisja narracji w wychowaniu rodzinnym. [Settling into culture: Narrative transmission in the family life]. Warszawa: Eneteia, Wydawnictwo Psychologii i Kultury.Google Scholar
Erikson, E., & Erikson, J. M. (1998). Life cycle completed. New York: Norton Paperback.Google Scholar
Fivush, R., Bohanek, J. G., & Zaman, W. (2011). Personal and intergenerational narratives in relation to adolescents’ well-being. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1311, 45–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2005). Persuasiveness of narratives. In T. C. Brock & M. C. Green (Eds.), Persuasion: Psychological insights and perspectives (pp. 117–142). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Greimas, A. J. (1976). Semiotique et sciences sociales. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Herman, D. (2008). Description, narrative, and explanation: Text-type categories and the cognitive foundations of discourse competence. Poetics Today, 29(3), 437–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotre, J. (2000). Generativity and a gift of meaning. Generations, 23(4), 65–70.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K., & Bock, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). The content analysis reader. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Maxwell, R., & Dickman, R. (2007). The elements of persuasion: use storytelling to pitch better, sell faster and win more business. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
McAdams, D. (1985). Power, intimacy and the life story. Personological inquiries into identity. Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
(2006). Redemptive self: Stories Americans live by. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (Eds.). (1998). Generativity and adult development. How and why we care for future generations. Washington: American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLean, K. C. (2015). The co-authored self. Family stories and the construction of personal identity. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metzger, D. (1992). Writing for your life: Discovering the story of your life’s journey. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
Moir, A., & Jessel, D. (1991). Brain sex: The real difference between man and women. New York: Delta Book.Google Scholar
Morgan, A. (2000). What is narrative therapy: An easy-to-read introduction. Adelaide, Dulwich Centre: Gecko.Google Scholar
Niemeyer, R. (2006). Narrating the dialogical self: Toward an expanded toolbox for the counselling psychologist. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19(1), 105–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nolden, L. (2014). Analysis of the functions of narrative futuring in “Letters from the future” written by psychiatric patients (Unpublished master dissertation). University of Twente, Psychology Faculty of Behavioural Sciences, Enschede.Google Scholar
Oleś, P. K. (2003). Wprowadzenie do psychologii osobowości. [The introduction to psychology of personality]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.Google Scholar
(2011). Psychologia człowieka dorosłego. [The psychology of adulthood]. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Pals, J., & McAdams, D. P. (2004). The transformed self: A narrative understanding of posttraumatic growth. Psychological Inquiry, 151, 65–69.Google Scholar
Pillemer, D. (1998). Momentous events vivid memories. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B., Pearce, K. A., Anas, A. P., & Norris, J. E. (2004). Writing a connection: Intergenerational communication through stories. In M. W. Pratt & B. E. Fiese (Eds.), Family stories and the life course: Across time and generations (pp. 375–398). Mahwah, New York: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Staudinger, U. M. (2001). Life reflection: A social-cognitive analysis of life review. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 148–160. [URL]
Thornstam, L. (2011). Maturing into gerotranscendence. The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology, 43(2), 166–180.Google Scholar
Tokarska, U. (2013). O potrzebie bycia potrzebnym. Miejsce generatywności w bilansie życiowym współczesnego człowieka. [About the need to be needed. The generativity plot inside the modern man`s life-review accounts]. In K. Mudyń (Ed.), W poszukiwaniu międzypokoleniowej transmisji wzorców zachowan, postaw i wartości (pp. 9–29). [In search of the intergenerational transmission of behavior patterns, attitudes, and values]. Toruń: Adam Marszałek Press.Google Scholar
Tokarska, U., & Ryżanowska, D. (2017). Letters to anorexia. Narrative tools for working with anorectic patients in a dialogical self context. Psychiatria Polska, Online First 691, 1–11. Published ahead of print 04 May 2017. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weststrate, N. M., & Glück, J. (2017). Hard-earned wisdom: Exploratory processing of difficult life experience is positively associated with wisdom. Developmental Psychology, 531, 800–814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, M., & Epston, D. (1998). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre.Google Scholar
Williams, A., & Nussbaum, J. F. (2012). Intergenerational communication across the life span. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, Ph., & Boyd, J. (2008). The time paradox. The new psychology of time that can change your life. New York: Free Press. A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Celdrán, Montserrat
2024. Grandparenting and Generativity. In The Development of Generativity across Adulthood, ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
McLean, Kate C., Nicole Moriarty, Kaleb Starling & Nic M. Weststrate
2024. Letters from Queer Elders: Transmitting Intergenerational Wisdom in LGBTQ+ Communities. Journal of Homosexuality ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
De Vincenzo, Ciro, Flavia Serio, Anita Franceschi, Simone Barbagallo & Adriano Zamperini
2022. A “Viral Epistolary” and Psychosocial Spirituality: Restoring Transcendental Meaning During COVID-19 Through a Digital Community Letter-Writing Project. Pastoral Psychology 71:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Fabiś, Artur, Arkadiusz Wąsiński & Oldřich Čepelka
2022. Intergenerational Messages as Sign of Wisdom of Active Polish and Czech Older Learners. Ageing International 47:2 ► pp. 284 ff. DOI logo
Żurawska-Żyła, Renata, Urszula Tokarska & Tomasz Knopik
2022. Self-distancing and narrative wisdom in older adults’ autobiographical reflection. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 35:3 ► pp. 1013 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.