Cover not available
Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 30:2 (2020) ► pp.211–235

The epistemics of narrative performance in conversation

 | Saarland University
This article investigates the flow of information in conversational narrative performance in light of research on the epistemics of talk in interaction and epistemic vigilance on the part of story recipients. Based on examples from a range of corpora, it reassesses the relationship between storytellers and recipients consistent with recipient design, and investigates cases of too little and too much information in narrative. Viewing narrative performance as sharing territories of knowledge provides new insights into the notions of telling rights and tellability as well as teller competence and credibility. The narrative performance may contain gaps and discrepancies along with clusters of copious information from which recipients must pick and choose to construct a dynamic narrative model to be tested against further information. In the communal presentation of family narratives, territories of knowledge merge, shared events are illuminated from separate perspectives, gaps in knowledge are filled, and evaluations are enriched.
Keywords: credibility, epistemics, information, narration, recipient design, storytelling, talk in interaction, territories of knowledge
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Toward narrative epistemics
  • Epistemic vigilance
  • Teller competence
  • Too little information, uncertainty, teller credibility
  • Too much information, paralepsis
  • Co-remembering, conarrating
  • Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 19 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18095.nor
References (52)
References
Bamberg, M. (2004). “I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn’t really care less about her anyway”: Form and Functions of ‘Slut-Bashing’ in 15-Year Olds. Human Development 471, 331–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Biographic-narrative research, quo vadis? A critical review of “big stories” from the perspective of “small stories.” In K. Milnes, C. Horrocks, N. Kelly, B. Roberts & D. Robinson (Eds.), Narrative, memory and knowledge: Representations, aesthetics and contexts (pp. 1–17). Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield Press.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). “You gotta know how to tell a story”: Telling, tales, and tellers in American and Israeli narrative events at dinner. Language in Society, 221, 361–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., & Snow, C. E. (1992). Developing autonomy for tellers, tales, and telling in family narrative events. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 21, 187–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brockmeier, J. (2000). Autobiographical time. Narrative Inquiry, 101, 51–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). From the end to the beginning: Retrospective teleology in autobiography. In J. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds.), Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self, and culture (pp. 248–280). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2008). Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 1071, 1122–1134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 181, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J., & Weisser, S. (1991). The invention of self: Autobiography and its forms. In D. R. Olsen & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 129–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2011). Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Falk, J. (1980). The conversational duet. Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting, 1980, 507–514.Google Scholar
Fricker, E. (2006). Second-hand knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(3), 592–618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genette, G. (1980). Narrative discourse: An essay in method, trans. by J. E. Lewin. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hatavara, M., & Mildorf, J. (2017). Hybrid Fictionality and Vicarious Narrative Experience. Narrative, 25(1), 65–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: A. J. Maxwell & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 199–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b). The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirst, W., & Echterhoff, G. (2012). Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 631, 55–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamio, A. (1997). Territory of information. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H. (1992). Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15(3), 247–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, J. (1987). Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 144–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mildorf, J. (2019). Narratives of Vicarious Experience in Oral History Interviews with Craft Artists. Journal of Pragmatics. 1521: 103–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (1997). Twice-told tales: Collaborative narration of familiar stories. Language in Society, 261, 199–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000). Conversational narrative. Amsterdam: Benjamins (2nd edition, 2010). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005). The dark side of tellability. Narrative Inquiry, 15(2), 323–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Remembering for narration and autobiographical memory. Language and Dialogue, 2(2), 193–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Narratives of vicarious experience in conversation. Language in Society, 42(4), 385–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Negation in narrative: Why say what didn’t happen? Narrative Inquiry, 28(2), 373–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quasthoff, U. M. (1980). Gemeinsames Erzählen als Form und Mittel im sozialen Konflikt oder ein Ehepaar erzählt eine Geschichte. In K. Ehlich (Ed.), Erzählen im Alltag (pp. 109–141). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Ryan, M.-L. (1985). The Modal Structure of Narrative Universes. Poetics Today, 6(4), 717–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1991). Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(2006). From parallel universes to possible worlds: Ontological pluralism in physics, narratology and narrative. Poetics Today, 27(4), 633–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H. (1974). An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1984). On doing “being ordinary”. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 413–429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992). Lectures on Conversation, 2 vols. G. Jefferson (Ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 501, 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1995). Discourse as an interactional achievement III: the omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 185–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Narrative as Self Portrait: The Sociolinguistic Construction of Identity. Language in Society, 251, 167–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shuman, A. (1986). Storytelling rights. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language, 251, 359–393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (2002). Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 251, 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 431, 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walsh, R. (2007). The rhetoric of fictionality: narrative theory and the idea of fiction. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Jeftic, Alma, Thomas Van de Putte & Johana Wyss
2023. Introduction. Narrative Inquiry 33:2 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Miecznikowski, Johanna & Jérôme Jacquin
2023. Epistemic and evidential markers in contexts of disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics 213 ► pp. 4 ff. DOI logo
Orton, Naomi & Liana Biar
2023. Stories less told. Behind-the-scenes of feminist narrative research in Brazil. GLAD! :15 DOI logo
Lee, Yo-An
2022. Conversational storytelling. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 102 ff. DOI logo
Van de Putte, Thomas
2022. “Let me tell you what we already know”: Collective memory between culture and interaction. Memory Studies 15:4 ► pp. 751 ff. DOI logo
Van de Putte, Thomas
2024. Memory and Scales: Culture, Institutions and Interaction. In Outsourcing the European Past [Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies, ], ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Van de Putte, Thomas
2024. Epistemic Authority in the Micro-details of Pedagogical Memory Discourse. In Outsourcing the European Past [Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies, ], ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Biar, Liana de Andrade, Naomi Orton & Liliana Cabral Bastos
2021. Tales from the South. Narrative Inquiry 31:1 ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Breeze, Ruth
2021. Claiming Credibility in Online Comments: Popular Debate Surrounding the COVID-19 Vaccine. Publications 9:3 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo
Norrick, Neal R.
2021. Requests for stories. Narrative Inquiry 31:1 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
Orton, Naomi & Liana De Andrade Biar
2021. Putting gender on the agenda in Rio de Janeiro. Gender and Language 15:4 DOI logo
Schoofs, Kim & Dorien Van De Mieroop
2021. Epistemic competitions over Jewish Holocaust survivors’ stories in interviews. Discourse & Society 32:6 ► pp. 728 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.