This article investigates the flow of information in conversational narrative performance in light of research on the epistemics of talk in interaction and epistemic vigilance on the part of story recipients. Based on examples from a range of corpora, it reassesses the relationship between storytellers and recipients consistent with recipient design, and investigates cases of too little and too much information in narrative. Viewing narrative performance as sharing territories of knowledge provides new insights into the notions of telling rights and tellability as well as teller competence and credibility. The narrative performance may contain gaps and discrepancies along with clusters of copious information from which recipients must pick and choose to construct a dynamic narrative model to be tested against further information. In the communal presentation of family narratives, territories of knowledge merge, shared events are illuminated from separate perspectives, gaps in knowledge are filled, and evaluations are enriched.
(2004) “I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn’t really care less about her anyway”: Form and Functions of ‘Slut-Bashing’ in 15-Year Olds. Human Development 471, 331–353.
(2006) Biographic-narrative research, quo vadis? A critical review of “big stories” from the perspective of “small stories.” In K. Milnes, C. Horrocks, N. Kelly, B. Roberts & D. Robinson (Eds.), Narrative, memory and knowledge: Representations, aesthetics and contexts (pp. 1–17). Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield Press.
(1993) “You gotta know how to tell a story”: Telling, tales, and tellers in American and Israeli narrative events at dinner. Language in Society, 221, 361–402.
Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(2008) Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 1071, 1122–1134.
(1991) The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 181, 1–21.
Bruner, J., & Weisser, S.
(1991) The invention of self: Autobiography and its forms. In D. R. Olsen & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 129–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A.
(2011) Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(1980) The conversational duet. Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting 1980, 507–514.
(2006) Second-hand knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(3), 592–618.
(1980) Narrative discourse: An essay in method, trans. by J. E. Lewin. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
(1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hatavara, M., & Mildorf, J.
(2017) Hybrid Fictionality and Vicarious Narrative Experience. Narrative, 25(1), 65–82.
(1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: A. J. Maxwell & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 199–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29.
(2012b) The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52.
Hirst, W., & Echterhoff, G.
(2012) Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 631, 55–79.
2021. Putting gender on the agenda in Rio de Janeiro. Gender and Language 15:4
Schoofs, Kim & Dorien Van De Mieroop
2021. Epistemic competitions over Jewish Holocaust survivors’ stories in interviews. Discourse & Society 32:6 ► pp. 728 ff.
Van de Putte, Thomas
2022. “Let me tell you what we already know”: Collective memory between culture and interaction. Memory Studies 15:4 ► pp. 751 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.