Article published in:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 30:2 (2020) ► pp. 211–235

The epistemics of narrative performance in conversation

| Saarland University
This article investigates the flow of information in conversational narrative performance in light of research on the epistemics of talk in interaction and epistemic vigilance on the part of story recipients. Based on examples from a range of corpora, it reassesses the relationship between storytellers and recipients consistent with recipient design, and investigates cases of too little and too much information in narrative. Viewing narrative performance as sharing territories of knowledge provides new insights into the notions of telling rights and tellability as well as teller competence and credibility. The narrative performance may contain gaps and discrepancies along with clusters of copious information from which recipients must pick and choose to construct a dynamic narrative model to be tested against further information. In the communal presentation of family narratives, territories of knowledge merge, shared events are illuminated from separate perspectives, gaps in knowledge are filled, and evaluations are enriched.
Keywords: credibility, epistemics, information, narration, recipient design, storytelling, talk in interaction, territories of knowledge
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Toward narrative epistemics
  • Epistemic vigilance
  • Teller competence
  • Too little information, uncertainty, teller credibility
  • Too much information, paralepsis
  • Co-remembering, conarrating
  • Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 19 May 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18095.nor
References
Bamberg, M.
(2004) “I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn’t really care less about her anyway”: Form and Functions of ‘Slut-Bashing’ in 15-Year Olds. Human Development 471, 331–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) Biographic-narrative research, quo vadis? A critical review of “big stories” from the perspective of “small stories.” In K. Milnes, C. Horrocks, N. Kelly, B. Roberts & D. Robinson (Eds.), Narrative, memory and knowledge: Representations, aesthetics and contexts (pp. 1–17). Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield Press.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S.
(1993) “You gotta know how to tell a story”: Telling, tales, and tellers in American and Israeli narrative events at dinner. Language in Society, 221, 361–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., & Snow, C. E.
(1992) Developing autonomy for tellers, tales, and telling in family narrative events. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 21, 187–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brockmeier, J.
(2000) Autobiographical time. Narrative Inquiry, 101, 51–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) From the end to the beginning: Retrospective teleology in autobiography. In J. Brockmeier & D. Carbaugh (Eds.), Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self, and culture (pp. 248–280). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
(2008) Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition, 1071, 1122–1134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J.
(1991) The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 181, 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J., & Weisser, S.
(1991) The invention of self: Autobiography and its forms. In D. R. Olsen & N. Torrance (Eds.), Literacy and orality (pp. 129–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.
(1994) Discourse, consciousness, and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A.
(2011) Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falk, J.
(1980) The conversational duet. Berkeley Linguistics Society: Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting 1980, 507–514.Google Scholar
Fricker, E.
(2006) Second-hand knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 73(3), 592–618. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genette, G.
(1980) Narrative discourse: An essay in method, trans. by J. E. Lewin. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hatavara, M., & Mildorf, J.
(2017) Hybrid Fictionality and Vicarious Narrative Experience. Narrative, 25(1), 65–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: A. J. Maxwell & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 199–345). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012b) The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirst, W., & Echterhoff, G.
(2012) Remembering in conversations: The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 631, 55–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamio, A.
(1997) Territory of information. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1972) Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Fanshel, D.
(1977) Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
(1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, G. H.
(1992) Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology, 15(3), 247–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, J.
(1987) Couples sharing stories. Communication Quarterly, 35(2), 144–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mildorf, J.
(2019) Narratives of Vicarious Experience in Oral History Interviews with Craft Artists. Journal of Pragmatics. 1521: 103–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R.
(1997) Twice-told tales: Collaborative narration of familiar stories. Language in Society, 261, 199–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Conversational narrative. Amsterdam: Benjamins (2nd edition 2010) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The dark side of tellability. Narrative Inquiry, 15(2), 323–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Remembering for narration and autobiographical memory. Language and Dialogue, 2(2), 193–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Narratives of vicarious experience in conversation. Language in Society, 42(4), 385–406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Negation in narrative: Why say what didn’t happen? Narrative Inquiry, 28(2), 373–395. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., & Capps, L.
(2001) Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quasthoff, U. M.
(1980) Gemeinsames Erzählen als Form und Mittel im sozialen Konflikt oder ein Ehepaar erzählt eine Geschichte. In K. Ehlich (Ed.), Erzählen im Alltag (pp. 109–141). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Ryan, M.-L.
(1985) The Modal Structure of Narrative Universes. Poetics Today, 6(4), 717–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Possible worlds, artificial intelligence and narrative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(2006) From parallel universes to possible worlds: Ontological pluralism in physics, narratology and narrative. Poetics Today, 27(4), 633–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1974) An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling. In R. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 337–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1984) On doing “being ordinary”. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 413–429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992) Lectures on Conversation, 2 vols. G. Jefferson (Ed.), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 501, 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1995) Discourse as an interactional achievement III: the omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 185–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D.
(1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) Narrative as Self Portrait: The Sociolinguistic Construction of Identity. Language in Society, 251, 167–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shuman, A.
(1986) Storytelling rights. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D.
(2010) Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language, 251, 359–393. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D.
(1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R.
(2002) Common Ground. Linguistics and Philosophy, 251, 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., & Rossano, F.
(2010) Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 431, 3–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, R.
(2007) The rhetoric of fictionality: narrative theory and the idea of fiction. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Biar, Liana de Andrade, Naomi Orton & Liliana Cabral Bastos
2021. Tales from the South. Narrative Inquiry 31:1 ► pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo
Breeze, Ruth
2021. Claiming Credibility in Online Comments: Popular Debate Surrounding the COVID-19 Vaccine. Publications 9:3 ► pp. 34 ff. Crossref logo
Lee, Yo-An
2022.  In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 102 ff. Crossref logo
Norrick, Neal R.
2021. Requests for stories. Narrative Inquiry 31:1 ► pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Orton, Naomi & Liana De Andrade Biar
2021. Putting gender on the agenda in Rio de Janeiro. Gender and Language 15:4 Crossref logo
Schoofs, Kim & Dorien Van De Mieroop
2021. Epistemic competitions over Jewish Holocaust survivors’ stories in interviews. Discourse & Society 32:6 ► pp. 728 ff. Crossref logo
Van de Putte, Thomas
2021. “Let me tell you what we already know”: Collective memory between culture and interaction. Memory Studies ► pp. 175069802110447 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.