Cover not available
Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 30:2 (2020) ► pp.236–270

Horizontality and gender in contemporary social movements

Narrative practice as a means of resistance

| Pontíficia Universidade Católica, Rio de Janeiro
| Pontíficia Universidade Católica, Rio de Janeiro
The notion of horizontal, “structureless” organisation continues to hold resounding appeal for those seeking to create more egalitarian societies. Given horizontality’s comfortable status as the golden child of contemporary social movements, in this article we ask to what extent symmetrical relations may materialize discursively within an ostensibly horizontal group. To do so, we analyse two narratives of resistance which emerge during a meeting of bicycle advocates in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Uniting insider and outsider perspectives, our analysis suggests that gendered asymmetries are simultaneously contested and reified during the activists’ narrative and interactional practice. As such, this study highlights the need to take a critical stance towards discursive practice in order to further understand the construction of horizontality. In so doing, it may then be possible to build communities which foster minority groups’ active participation and the very transformative practice sought out by those who engage in social movements.
Keywords: gender performance, gender identity, social movements, horizontality, resistance, story telling in interaction
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Contemporary social movements, horizontality and gendered performances
  • Narrative practice and resistance
  • Methodological considerations and epistemological stance
  • Data analysis: How are power dynamics navigated within the narrated world?
  • Adding a second layer to the analysis: How are power dynamics navigated during the narrative event?
  • Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.19045.ort
References (64)
References
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 335–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Talk, small stories, and adolescent identities. Human Development, 471, 366–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Stories: Big and small. Why do we care? Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 139–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. (1986). Story, performance and event. Contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benford, R., & Snow, D. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 261, 611–639. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benicchio, T. (2012). Critical Mass is Dead. Long Live Critical Mass! In C. Carlsson, L. Elliott & A. Camarena (Eds.), Shift Happens! Critical Mass at 20 (pp. 85–99). San Francisco: Full Enjoyment Books.Google Scholar
Blickstein, S., & Hanson, S. (2001). Critical Mass: forging a politics of sustainable mobility in the information age. Transportation, 281, 347–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2001). Context is/as critique. Critique of Anthropology, 21(1), 13–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bodzin, S. (2002). Politics can be fun. In C. Carlsson (Ed.), Critical Mass, Bicycling’s defiant Celebration (pp. 100–104). Oakland: AK Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). The Economics of Linguistic Exchanges. Social Science Information, 16(6), 645–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruzzone, M. (2012). Putting the “Critical” in Critical Mass: Patriarchy, Radical Feminism and Radical Inclusiveness. In C. Carlsson, L. Elliott & A. Camarena (Eds.), Shift Happens! Critical Mass at 20 (pp. 131–141). San Francisco: Full Enjoyment Books.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2004). Language and Identity. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp. 369–394). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2005). Identity and interaction: a sociocultural and linguistic approach. Discourse studies, 71, 585–614. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: feminism and identity subversion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Camarena, A. (2012). The Blind Spot: Subcultural Exclusivity in Critical Mass. In C. Carlsson, L. Elliott & A. Camarena (Eds.), Shift Happens! Critical Mass at 20 (pp. 117–126). San Francisco: Full Enjoyment Books.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1992). ‘Not gender difference but the difference gender makes’- explanation in research on sex and language. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 941, 13–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998a). Gender, Language and Discourse: A Review Essay. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 23(4), 945–973. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998b). “Is there any ketchup Vera?”: gender, power and pragmatics. Discourse & Society, 9(4), 437–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006a). Language, Gender, and Sexuality: Current Issues and New Directions. Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 482–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006b). Performing gender identity: young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In D. Cameron (Ed.), On Language and Sexual Politics (pp. 61–74). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2018). Feminism: ideas in profile. London: Profile.Google Scholar
Carlsson, C. (1992–1998). The hidden class politics of bicycling, trains, cars, BART(!). In C. Carlsson, J. Swanson & H. D. Andrade (Eds.), Critical Mass Essays, Flyers, Images from San Francisco. Available at: [URL] (accessed in June 2019).
(Ed.). (2002). Critical Mass: Bicycling’s Defiant Celebration. Oakland: AK Press.Google Scholar
Carlsson, C., Elliott, L., & Camarena, A. (2012). Shift Happens! Critical Mass at 20. San Francisco: Full Enjoyment Books.Google Scholar
Carpentier, N. (2016). Beyond the ladder of participation: an analytical toolkit for the critical analysis of participatory media processes. Javnost – The Public, 23(1), 70–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Andrade, H. (2012). Personal Mass. In C. Carlsson, L. Elliott & A. Camarena (Eds.), Shift Happens! Critical Mass at 20 (pp. 19–29). San Francisco: Full Enjoyment Books.Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research 2 (pp. 1–32). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (1989). The Whole Woman: Sex and Gender Differences in Variation. Language Variation and Change, 11, 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. (2003). Narrating Social Structure: Stories of Resistance to Legal Authority. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1328–1372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. (1997). Rethinking the public sphere. In N. Fraser (Ed.), Justice Interrupts – Critical reflections on the “post socialist” condition (pp. 72–98). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2002). Redistribuição ou reconhecimento? Classe e status na sociedade contemporânea. Interseções, 4(1), 7–31.Google Scholar
Frazer, E., & Cameron, D. (1988). Knowing what to say: the construction of gender in linguistic practice. Sociological Review Monograph Series: Social Anthropology and the Politics of Language, 36(1), 25–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freeman, J. (1972). The Tyranny of Structurelessness. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 171, 151–165.Google Scholar
Furness, Z. (2007). Critical Mass, Urban Space and Vélomobility. Mobilities, 2(2), 299–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcez, P. M. (2001). Deixa eu te contar uma coisa: o trabalho sociológico do narrar na conversa cotidiana. In B. T. Ribeiro, C. C. Lima & M. T. L. Dantas (Eds.), Narrativa, identidade e clínica (pp. 189–213). Rio de Janeiro: IPUB.Google Scholar
Gastaldo, E. (2008). Goffman e as relações de poder na vida cotidiana. Revista brasileira de ciências sociais, 231, 149–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopolou, A. (1997). Narrative performances: A study of Modern Greek storytelling. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006). Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 122–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gergen, M. M., & Gergen, K. J. (2000). Qualitative Inquiry: Tensions and Transformations. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research 2 (pp. 1025–1046). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on face-to-face behaviour. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
(1977). The Arrangement Between the Sexes. Theory and Society, 41, 301–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1979). Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
(1983). The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klett, M. (2002). A uniquely democratic experiment. In C. Carlsson (Ed.), Critical Mass, Bicycling’s defiant Celebration (pp. 90–93). Oakland: AK Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972a). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov (Ed.), Language in the inner city (pp. 354–96). Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar
(1972b). The Study of Language in its Social Context. In W. Labov (Ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns (pp. 183–259). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Linde, C. (1993). Life Stories, the creation of coherence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1997). Evaluation as linguistic structure and social practice. In B. Gunnarsson, P. Linell & B. Nordberg (Eds.), The Construction of Professional Discourse (pp. 151–172). London: Longman, 1997.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., & White, P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation. Great Britain: Palgrave/Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEntee-Atalianis, L., & Litosseliti, L. (2017). Narratives of sex segregated professional identities. Narrative Inquiry, 27(1), 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moita Lopes, L. P. (2001). Práticas narrativas como espaço de construção de identidades sociais: uma abordagem socioconstrucionista. In B. T. Ribeiro, C. Lima & M. T. Dantas (Eds.), Narrativa, Identidade e Clínica (pp. 55–71). Rio de Janeiro: IPUB.Google Scholar
Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1995). The “Father Knows Best” Dynamic in Dinnertime Narratives. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self (pp. 99–122). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peterson, E., & Langellier, M. (2006). The performance turn in narrative studies. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 173–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rolnik, R. (2013). As vozes das ruas: as revoltas de junho e suas interpretações. In Boitempo & Carta Maior (Eds.), Cidades Rebeldes: Passe Livre e as manifestações que tomaram as ruas do Brasil. (pp. 9–20). São Paulo: Boitempo Editorial.Google Scholar
Roth, M. (2012). A Tumultuous Ride: New York City Critical Mass and the Wrath of the NYPD. In C. Carlsson, L. Elliott & A. Camarena (Eds.), Shift Happens! Critical Mass at 20 (pp. 235–253). San Francisco: Full Enjoyment Books.Google Scholar
Santos, B. S. (2007). Renovar a teoria crítica e reinventar a emancipação social. Rio de Janeiro: Boitempo.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. London/New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 311, 46–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, J. (2011). ‘D’you understand that honey?’: Gender and participation in conversation. In S. Speer & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Conversation and Gender (pp. 183–209). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snow, D., & Benford, R. (1988). Ideology, frame, resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movements Research, 11, 197–218.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1989). “Oh talking voice that is so sweet”: constructing dialogue in conversation. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Talking voices (pp. 102–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Velho, G. (1980). Observando o familiar. In G. Velho (Ed.), Individualismo e cultura: notas para uma antropologia da sociedade contemporânea (pp. 123–132). Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.Google Scholar
Walsh, C. (2001). Gender and Discourse: Language and Power in Politics, the Church and Organizations. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Biar, Liana de Andrade, Naomi Orton & Liliana Cabral Bastos
2021. A PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ANÁLISE DE NARRATIVA EM TEMPOS DE “PÓS-VERDADE”. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 21:2 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Biar, Liana de Andrade, Naomi Orton & Liliana Cabral Bastos
2021. Tales from the South. Narrative Inquiry 31:1 ► pp. 126 ff. DOI logo
Orton, Naomi
2021. “MYTHS”, “TRUTHS” AND THE ROLE OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada 60:2 ► pp. 455 ff. DOI logo
Orton, Naomi & Liana De Andrade Biar
2021. Putting gender on the agenda in Rio de Janeiro. Gender and Language 15:4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.