Article published in:
Methodology of Narrative Study: What the first thirty years of Narrative Inquiry have revealed
Edited by Allyssa McCabe and Dorien Van De Mieroop
[Narrative Inquiry 31:1] 2021
► pp. 28–48

Requests for stories

The evolving notion of tellability in narrative studies

| Saarland University
My contribution traces the evolving notion of tellability in the study of narrative over the last thirty-odd years: Tellability was initially seen as an objective property of textual content, but research on narrative in real contexts of talk has increasingly recognized the various ways interactional factors can override content as grounds for relating a story. I advance a set of research strategies based on investigation of the discourse structures that accompany the negotiation of tellability in context and the syntactic markers of tellability, specifically requests for stories like “tell me” and “tell her,” correlating with features of recipient design in narration. This will reveal distinctions in presuppositions about who knows a story already, who else should be included, and who may conarrate, demonstrating how tellability varies from one participant to another even in the same context.
Keywords: conarration, context, conversation, epistemics, interaction, presupposition, recipient design, reminiscing, tellability
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Aims and organization
  • Chronology
  • Extending the concept of tellability
  • The dark side of tellability
  • Epistemics of narration
  • Investigating tellability: Tell me, tell her, tell them
  • Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 01 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.20062.nor
References
Bamberg, M.
(2004) “I know it may sound mean to say this, but we couldn’t really care less about her anyway”: Form and Functions of ‘Slut-Bashing’ in 15-Year Olds. Human Development, 471, 331–353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baroni, R.
(2014) “Tellability” in the living handbook of narratology https://​www​.lhn​.uni​-hamburg​.de​/node​/30​.html Created: 4. August 2011 Revised: 18. April 2014. Crossref
Bateson, G.
(1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G.
(2002) Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S.
(1993) ‘You gotta know how to tell a story’: Telling, tales, and tellers in and Israeli narrative events at dinner. Language in Society, 221, 361–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., & Snow, C. E.
(1992) Developing autonomy for tellers, tales, and telling in family narrative events. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 21, 187–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L.
(1994) Discourse, Consciousness, and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, J., & Jaworski, A.
(2003) Transgression and intimacy in recreational talk narratives. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 361, 85–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A.
(2005) Same old story? On the interactional dynamics of shared narratives. In U. M. Quasthoff & T. Becker (Eds.), Narrative Interaction (pp. 223–242). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E.
(1974) Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1987) Forgetfulness as an interactive resource. Social Psychological Quarterly, 501, 115–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012b) The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E.
(1987) Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and Social Organisation (pp. 152–327). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jones, R. L.
(2002) “That’s very rude, I shouldn’t be telling you that”: Older women talking about sex. Narrative Inquiry, 12(1), 121–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karatsu, M.
(2012) Conversational Storytelling among Japanese Women: Conversational Circumstances and Tellability of Stories. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1972) Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(2013) The Language of Life and Death: The Transformation of Experience in Oral Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W., & Fanshel, D.
(1977) Therapeutic discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J.
(1967) Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Norrick, N. R.
(1997) Twice-told tales: Collaborative narration of familiar stories. Language in Society, 261, 199–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Conversational Narrative. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Humor, tellability and conarration in conversation. Text, 24(1), 79–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The dark side of tellability. Narrative Inquiry, 151, 323–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Narrative illocutionary acts direct and indirect. Journal of Pragmatics, 861, 94–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) The epistemics of narrative performance in conversation. Narrative Inquiry, 30(2), 211–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., & Capps, L.
(2001) Living Narrative: Creating Lives in Everyday Storytelling. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, L.
(1979) So what’s the point? Semiotica, 251, 207–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quasthoff, U.
(1980) Erzählen in Gesprächen: Linguistische Untersuchungen zu Strukturen und Funktionen am Beispiel einer Kommunikationsform des Alltags. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Ryave, A. L.
(1978) On the Achievement of a Series of Stories. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 113–32). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1984) On doing “being ordinary.” In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 413–429). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992) Lectures on Conversation, 21 vols. G. Jefferson (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
(1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 501, 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A.
(1995) Discourse as an interactional achievement III: the omnirelevance of action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 185–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, E., & Edwards, D.
(2006) Story formulations in talk-in-interaction. Narrative Inquiry, 161, 56–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar