Cover not available
Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 34:1 (2024) ► pp.78–105

Ta as an emergent language practice of audience design in CMC

ORCID logo | University of Alberta , Canada

This study examines the use of ungendered third person Chinese pronoun ta in digital first-and-third person voiced discourses (i.e. small stories). The study asks what implications the script choice ta, as opposed to gendered 他 ta ‘he’ and 她 ta ‘she’, has for audience design and the facilitation of character empathy. The study draws on 131 digital texts from celebrity verified accounts on social media platform Sina Weibo in October 2015. From a Discourse Analytical perspective focused on deixis relative to the notion of empathy in storytelling, the study investigates emergent practices which involve the orthographic manipulation of gender. The study proposes that ta is an interpersonal resource whose deictic properties as a non-standard spelling are exploited as a property of audience design to facilitate an appeal to empathy. This facilitation is advanced by the script choice which offers a wider scope of reference, and thus targets a wider audience.

Keywords: empathy, pronouns, pragmatics, person, Mandarin Chinese, audience design, context collapse
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Study background
  • Data and methodology
  • Results and discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 29 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21049.slu
References
Allan, K., Capone, A., & Kecskees, I.
(Eds.) (2016) Pragmemes and theories of language use. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J.
(2012) “Greeklish”: Transliteration practice and discourse in the context of computer-mediated digraphia. In A. M. Jaffe, J. K. Androutsopoulos, M. Sebba, & S. A. Johnson (Eds.), Orthography as social action. Scripts, spelling, identity and power (pp. 359–392). de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking. Discourse, Context & Media, 4 (5), 62–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR)
(2012a) Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Committee. [URL]
(2012b) Appendix 1, AoIR Guidelines: Ethical Decision Making and Internet Research Ethics. Ethics Graphic. [URL]
Bach, K. & Harnish, R. M.
(1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baker, A.
(2016) Feeling like stories: Empathy and narrative engagement (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sheffield, White Rose eThese Online). [URL]
Bakhtin, M.
(1981) The dialogic imagination: four essays. [URL]
Bamberg, M.
(2012) Narrative analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 85–102). American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barthes, R., & Duisit, L.
(1975) An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative. New Literary History, 6 (2), 237–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baym, N., & boyd, d.
(2012) Socially Mediated Publicness: An Introduction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56 (3), 320–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, A.
(2001) Back in style: Reworking audience design. In P. Eckert & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 139–169). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, A., & Ensslin, A.
(2011) “I know what it was. You know what it was”: Second-Person narration in hypertext fiction. Narrative, 19 (3), 311–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
boyd, d.
(2008) Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics. (unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, SSRN). DOI logo
boyd, d., & Ellison, N. B.
(2008) Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1), 210–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R., & Gilman, A.
(1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–276). Cambridge: Technology Press of Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Cao, X.
(2014) The effects of narrative perspectives and gender similarity to a victim on sympathy and support for aid to people in need. Studies in Media and Communication, 2 (1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chan, C. H.
(2011) The Europeanization of modern written Chinese: a case study of the changing third person pronouns in the twentieth century and beyond. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Chang, Y., Li, Y., Yan, J., & Kumar, V.
(2019) Getting more likes: the impact of narrative person and brand image on customer–brand interactions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47 (6), 1027–1045. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H.
(1992) Arenas of language use. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.
(2001) Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media character. Mass Communication & Society, 4 1, 245–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, F.
(1996) The Blackwell encyclopedia of writing systems. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dailey-O’Cain, J.
(2017) Trans-National English in social media communities. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dayter, D.
(2015) Small stories and extended narratives on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media, 10 1, 19–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A.
(2012) Analyzing narrative : discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J.
(2012) Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39 1, 802–823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deringer, L., Gast, V., Haas, F., & Rudolf, O.
(2015) Impersonal uses of the second person singular and generalized empathy: An exploratory corpus study of English, German and Russian. In L. Gardellle & S. Sorlin (Eds.), The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns (pp. 311–334). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deumert, A.
(2014) Sociolinguistics and mobile communication. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Eberl, M.
(2020) Double trouble. In S. Rüdiger & D. Dayter (Eds.), Corpus approaches to social media: Studies in corpus linguistics (pp.131–146). John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esquivel, O. J. D.
(2019) Exploring the Filipinization of the English language in a digital age: An identity apart from other world Englishes. Journal of English as an International Language, 14 (1), 58–72.Google Scholar
Gibbons, A., & Macrae, A.
(Eds.) (2018) Pronouns in literature: Positions and perspectives in language. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, N.
(2010) Playing with language in e-Japan: Old wine in new bottles. Japanese Studies, 30 (3), 393–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M.
(2008) The Paradox of fiction and the ethics of empathy: Reconceiving Dickens’s realism. Narrative, 16 (3), 256–278. [URL]
Hartung, F., Burke, M., Hagoort, P., & Willems, R. M.
(2016) Taking Perspective: Personal Pronouns Affect Experiential Aspects of Literary Reading. PLOS ONE, 11 (5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, K. J., Brown, B., Crawford, P., MacFarlane, A., & McPherson, A.
(2007) “Am I normal?” Teenagers, sexual health and the Internet. Social Science and Medicine, 65 1, 771–781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, S. C.
(2004) Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis. In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning (pp. 338–376). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horie, K., & Shimura, M.
(2003) Overt anaphoric expressions, empathy, and the uchi-soto distinction in Japanese. Proceedings of the 2nd Seoul International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics, 297–310.Google Scholar
Hu, S. S. 胡心馨
(2015) 公益敘事廣告中不同人稱情境對同理心影響之效果研究. “gongyixushi guanggaozhong butong renchengqingjing dui tonglixin yingxiang zhi xiaoguo yanjiu” [ The effect of different personal pronouns in narrative advertisement on empathy, attitudes and behavioral intention .]. (Unpublished Master’s thesis, Shih Hsin University, Taiwan, National Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations in Taiwan). [URL]
Khuman, B., & Madhumita, G.
(2018) Ungendered narrative: A new genre in the making. Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 44 (2), 271–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keen, S.
(2006) A theory of narrative empathy. Narrative, 14 (3), 207–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, E. M.
(2015) Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 50 1, 62–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lange, P.
(2008) Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1), 361–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. K.-M.
(2007) Affordances and text-making practices in online instant messaging. Written Communication, 24 (3), 223–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Litt, E.
(2012) Knock, knock. Who’s there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56 (3), 330–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Majors, K.
(2013) Children’s perceptions of their imaginary companions and the purposes they serve: An exploratory study in the United Kingdom. Childhood, 20 (4), 550–565. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, J.
(1988) Chinese. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J. W., & Zappavigna, M.
(2014) Researching Language and Social Media. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, B.
(2006) Unnatural voices: extreme narration in modern and contemporary fiction. Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, W. C.
(2019) Why can’t I speak in kanji?: Indexing social identities through marked script use in Japanese manga. Discourse, Context & Media, 30 1. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seale, C.
(2006) Gender accommodation in online cancer support groups. Health, 10 (3), 345–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., MacFarlane, A., & McPherson, A.
(2013) Interviews and Internet Forums: A Comparison of Two Sources of Qualitative Data. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual Research Methods (Vol. 31). 41–60. SAGE Publications, Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., & Ziebland, S.
(2006) Gender, cancer experience and Internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine, 62 (10), 2577–2590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seargeant, P., Tagg, C., & Ngampramuan, W.
(2012) Language choice and addressivity strategies in Thai-English social network interactions. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16 (4), 510–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sebba, M.
(2011) Spelling and society : The culture and politics of orthography around the world. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seiffge-Krenke, I.
(1997) Imaginary companions in adolescence: A sign of a deficient or positive development? Journal of Adolescence, 20 (2), 137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sluchinski, K.
(forthcoming) Ta as a Facilitator of Empathy in Chinese CMC Narratives. Chinese Language and Discourse.Google Scholar
(2020) A Discursive Pragmatic Approach to the Third Person Pronoun ta in Chinese Computer Mediated Communication. East Asian Pragmatics, 5 (2), 247–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019) Genderless Narratives: The Pragmatics of ta in Chinese Social Media. In K. Martin (Ed.), The 2019 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association: 2019 Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences. [URL];   DOI logo
Sluchinski, K., & Gallant, J.
(2020) Abstract: One-size-fits-all: Psycholinguistic self-paced reading experiment supporting discourse analysis of the non-standard, gender-neutral mandarin pronoun ‘TA.’ DisCorX 2021: Discourse in corpus and experimental data: bridging the methodological gap. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B.
(2004) Language policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Squire et al.
(2014) What is narrative research? Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strange, J. J.
(2002) How fictional tales wag real-world beliefs: Models and mechanisms of narrative influence. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 263–286). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Tagg, C., & Seargeant, P.
(2012) Writing systems at play in Thai-English online interactions. Writing Systems Research, 4 (2), 195–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M., Hulette, A. C., & Dishion, T. J.
(2010) Longitudinal outcomes of young high-risk adolescents with imaginary companions. Developmental Psychology, 46 (6), 1632–1636. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unseth, P.
(2005) Sociolinguistic parallels between choosing scripts and languages. Written Language and Literacy, 8 (1), 19–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Utell, J.
(2016) Engagements with narrative. Routledge.Google Scholar
van Lissa, C., Caracciolo, M., van Leuveren, B., & van Durren, T.
(2016) Difficult empathy. The effect of narrative perspective on readers’ engagement with a first-person narrator. Diegesis: Interdisziplinäres E-Journal Für Erzählforschung, 5 (1), 43–63.Google Scholar
Wardle, E., & Downs, D.
(2014) Writing about writing: a college reader. Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Whiteman, N.
(2012) Undoing ethics: rethinking practice in online research. Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, D., & Thelwall, M.
(2013) Researching Personal Information on the Public Web: Methods and Ethics. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual Research Methods (Vol. 41). 139–156. SAGE Publications, Ltd. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C.
(2007) Chinese Internet language: A sociolinguistic analysis of adaptations of the Chinese writing system. Language@Internet 4 (2), 1–17.Google Scholar
Yuan, E. J.
(2012) Language as social practice on the Chinese Internet. In K. St. Amant, & S. Kelsey (Eds.), Computer-Mediated communication across cultures: International interactions in online environments (pp. 266–281). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhan, X. H. 詹秀华
(2013) 说 “TA”. “shuo ‘TA’” [Let’s talk about “TA”] 廊坊师范学院学报 （社会科学版） “Langfangshifanxueyuanxuebao (shehuikexue ban)” [Journal of Langfang Teachers College (Social Sciences Edition)], 29 (6), 36–38.Google Scholar
Zhong, Z. J. 钟之静
(2015) 网络新词汇ta 的第三人称代词三分法意义的分析. “Wanglouxincihui ta de di san renchengdaici san fenfayiyi de fenxi”. [Analysis of the three meanings of the third person pronoun new Internet word ta] 湖北科技学院学报 “hubeijiaoxuexueyuanxuebao” [Journal of Hubei University of Science and Technology], 35 (5), 77–79.Google Scholar
Zimmer, M.
(2010) But the data is already public: on the ethics of research in Facebook. Moral Luck, Social Networking Sites, and Trust on the Web, (4), 313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Gallant, Jordan & Kerry Sluchinski
2023. Non-gendered pronoun processing: an investigation of the gender non-specific third person singular pronoun ‘TA’ in Chinese. Discourse Processes 60:8 ► pp. 535 ff. DOI logo
Sluchinski, Kerry
2023. Pronoun TA as a facilitator of empathy in Chinese digital narratives. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 14:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.