Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry: Online-First ArticlesHow do Mandarin-speaking children relate events in personal narratives?
This study explored Mandarin-speaking children’s independent ability in using conjunctions to relate events in personal narration. Twenty three-year-olds, twenty four-year-olds, twenty five-year-olds and twenty six-year-olds participated, and they were prompted to tell personal stories. Conjunctions were assessed in terms of the use of seven types of connectives. With age, Mandarin-speaking children used more diversified conjunctions and produced more conjunctions in their personal narratives. Significant differences were found across age groups in the frequency of sequential, temporal, and simple connectives, but the proportional use of these three connectives did not differ across age groups. No gender differences were found in the use of any of the connectives. Mandarin-speaking children relied on sequential, temporal and simple connectives to relate events in their narratives, and the use of causal, additive, adversative and conditional connectives were rare. Chinese mothers’ greater emphasis on knowledge, social rules and moral standards may contribute to this.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Literature review on conjunction usage
- The present study
- Method
- Participants
- Procedures
- Language talkativity of children aged 3 to 6
- Coding of conjunctions used
- Statistical analyses
- Results
- Language talkativity of children aged 3 to 6
- The overall development of conjunction usage
- The specific characteristics of conjunction usage for each age group
- Gender differences in conjunction usage
- Discussion
- Overall development
- The specific characteristics of conjunction usage for each age group
- Gender differences in conjunction usage?
- Educational implications
- Limitations
- Conclusion
- Note
-
References
References (39)
Bayat, N., Cetin, M., & Temizkol, S. (2014). Children’s levels of comprehending connectives. 5th World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership.
Berman, R. A. (1995). Narrative Competence and Storytelling Performance: How Children Tell Stories in Different Contexts. Journal of Narrative and Life History,
5
1, 285–313. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloom, L., Lahey, M., Hood, L., Lifter, K., & Fiess, K. (1980). Complex sentences: acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode. Journal of Child Language,
7
1, 235–261. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chang, C. (1998). The development of autonomy in preschool Mandarin Chinese-speaking children’s play narratives. Narrative Inquiry,
8
1, 77–111. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
(2000). Narrative performance across contexts and over time: Preschool Chinese children and mothers [Doctoral Dissertation]. Harvard University.
(2004). Telling stories of experiences: Narrative development of young Chinese children. Applied Psycholinguistics,
25
(1), 83–104. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cicchetti, D. V., & Feinstein, A. R. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: II. Resolving the paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,
43
(6), 551–558. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duggleby, S., Tang, W., & Kuo-Newhouse, A. (2015). Does the use of connective words in written assessments predict high school students’ reading and writing achievement? Reading psychology,
37
1, 511–532. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evers-Vermeul, J., & Sanders, T. (2008). The emergence of Dutch and English connectives: How cumulative complexity explains the order of acquisition. Journal of Child Language,
36
(4), 829–854. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,
43
(6), 543–549. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fivush, R., Haden, C., & Adam, S. (1995). Structure and coherence of preschoolers’ personal narratives over time: Implications for childhood amnesia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,
60
1, 32–56. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glenn-Applegate, K., Breit-Smith, A., Justice, L. M., & Piasta, S. B. (2010). Artfulness in young children’s spoken narratives. Early Education and Development,
21
(3), 468–493. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Glória, Y. A. L., Hanauer, L. P., Wiethan, F. M., Nóro, L. A., & Mota, H. B. (2016). The use of conjunctions by children with typical language development. CoDAS
28
(3), 221–225. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Griffith, P. L., Ripich, D. N., & Dastoli, S. L. (1986). Story structure, cohesion, and propositions in story recalls by learning-disabled and nondisabled children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,
15
(6), 539–555. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gulzow, I., Bartlitz, V., Kuehnast, M., Golcher, F., and Bittner, D. (2018). The adversative connectives aber and but in conversational corpora. Journal of Child Language,
45
(5), 1212–1226. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCabe, A., & Bliss, S. L. (2003). Patterns of narrative discourse: a multicultural, life span approach. Pearson Allyn & Bacon.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCabe, A., & Peterson, C. (1997). Meaningful ‘mistakes’: The systematicity of children’s connectives in narrative discourse and the social origins of this usage about the past. In J. Costermans & M. Fayol (Eds.), Processing interclausal relationships: Studies in the production and comprehension of text (pp. 139–154). Lawrence Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCabe, A. (1997). Developmental and cross-cultural aspects of children’s narration. In M. Bamberg (ed.), Narrative development: Six approaches (pp.137–174). Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. S. (1981). The relation between age and mean length of utterance in morphemes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,
24
(2), 154–161. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, P. J., Wiley, A. R., Fung, H., & Liang, C. (1997). Personal storytelling as a medium of socialization in Chinese and American families. Child Development,
68
(3), 557–568. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Minami, M. (1996). Japanese preschool children’s narrative development. First Language,
16
1, 339–363. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. Plenum Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
(1991a). Children’s connective use and narrative macrostructure. In A. McCabe & C. Peterson (Eds.), Developing narrative structure (pp. 29–53). Erlbaum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
(1991b). On the threshold of the storyrealm: Semantic versus pragmatic use of connectives in narratives. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,
37
(3), 445–464.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preece, A. (1987). The range of narrative forms conversationally produced by young children. Journal of Child Language,
14
(2), 353–373. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sah, W. H. (2013). Global and local connections in Mandarin-speaking children’s narratives: A developmental study based on the frog story. In A. McCabe & C. J. Chang (Eds.), Chinese Language Narration: Culture, cognition, and emotion. John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sanders, T. J. M. (1997). Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context. Discourse Processes
24
1, 119–47. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Veen, R., Evers-Vermeul, J., Sanders, T., & Van Den Bergh, H. (2013). The influence of input on connective acquisition: a growth curve analysis of English ‘because’ and German weil’. Journal of Child Language,
40
(5), 1003–1031. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Veen, R., Evers-Vermeul, J., Sanders, T., & Van den Bergh, H. (2009). Parental input and connective acquisition: a growth curve analysis. First Language,
29
(3), 266–288. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Family Medicine,
37
(5), 360–363.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Q., & Leichtman, M. D. (2000). Same beginning, different stories: A comparison of American and Chinese children’s narratives. Child Development,
71
(5), 1329–1346. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.