Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry: Online-First ArticlesAbstraction in storytelling
Discussions of storytelling and narrative have encompassed abstraction in different ways including master
narratives (Bamberg, 1997) and storylines (Harré
& van Lagenhove, 1998). These discussions, however, have often viewed storytelling and abstraction as a binary
distinction, rather than a spectrum where speakers move between different levels of abstraction when recounting experiences. This
article argues for a nuanced approach to abstraction in storytelling that considers how specific details of stories – namely,
actors, actions, contexts, and time – are excluded or abstracted in the recounting of experience, with a link between increased
abstraction and implied moral judgement. The article first outlines the theoretical basis for this argument, and then shows
specific examples of abstraction taken from stories about religious experience. Finally, the productive implications of a nuanced
view of abstraction are outlined, including for narrative and discourse analysis, for understanding of storytelling and cognition,
and for critical analysis of racist language.
Keywords: storylines, abstraction, small stories, narrative, storytelling, master narratives, discourse
Article outline
- Introduction
- Abstraction defined
- Abstraction in storytelling
- Abstraction in constructed examples
- Abstraction in practice
- Conclusion
-
References
References (27)
Ahmed, S. (2015). The
Voices of Young British Muslims: Identity, Belonging and
Citizenship. In M. K. Smith, N. Stanton, & T. Wylie (Eds.), Youth
Work and Faith: Debates, Delights and
Dilemmas (pp. 37–51). Russell House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T. (2013). Discourse
analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning
between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life
History,
7
(1–4), 335–342. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
(2006). Stories:
Big or small: Why do we care? Narrative
Inquiry,
16
(1), 139–147. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small
stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text &
Talk,
28
(3), 377–396. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruce, T. (2018). New
technologies, continuing ideologies: Online reader comments as a support for media perspectives of minority
religions. Discourse, Context &
Media,
24
1, 53–75. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, L. (2015). Embracing
connectedness and change: A complex dynamic systems perspective for applied linguistic
research. AILA
Review,
28
(1), 28–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2011). Analyzing
narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C. (2010). A
frames approach to semantic analysis. In The Oxford handbook of
linguistic
analysis (pp. 313–339). Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Georgakopoulou, A. (2006). Thinking
big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative
Inquiry,
16
(1), 122–130. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
(2007). Small
Stories, Interaction and Identities. John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harré, R. (2000). The
social construction of terrorism. In F. M. Moghaddam & A. J. Marsella (Eds.), Understanding
terrorism. APA Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harré, R., & van Lagenhove, L. (1998). Positioning
Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Blackwell Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential
Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies
in the Organization of Conversational
Interaction (pp. 219–248). Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women,
fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press Chicago. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lueg, K., Bager, A. S., & Lundholt, M. W. (2020). What
counter-narratives are: Dimensions and levels of a theory of middle
range. In Routledge Handbook of
Counter-Narratives (pp. 1–14). Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sloutsky, V. M., & Deng, W. S. (2019). Categories,
concepts, and conceptual development. Language, Cognition and
Neuroscience,
34
(10), 1284–1297. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.