Article published In:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 24:2 (2014) ► pp.239258
Bartholomew, R.E., & Howard, G.S.
(1998) UFOs and alien contact. Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Branton, J., & McVicker, L.
(2011) Mysterious flying object identified. The Columbian 9th March 2011 Available at: [URL] [Accessed 27th July 2011].
Brunvand, J.H.
(1981) The vanishing hitchhiker: Urban legends and their meanings. Glasgow, UK: Picador.Google Scholar
Castro, M., Burrows, R., and Wooffitt, R.
The paranormal is (still) normal: The sociological implications of a survey of paranormal experiences in Great Britain. Sociological Research Online, 19 (3), 16 [URL] DOI: DOI logo
Devereux, G.
(Ed.) (1953) Psychoanalysis and the occult. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
De Fina, A.
(2009) Narratives in interview - The case of accounts. Narrative Inquiry, 19(2), 233–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, P.
(2012) What drives sequences? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 61–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, P., & Heritage, J.
(1992) Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, A.
(2011) Toward a sociology of perception: Sight, sex and gender. Cultural Sociology, 5(2), 187–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E.
(1981) The work of discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of Social Science, 11(2), 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, C.
(1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) Seeing in-depth. Social Studies of Science, 251, 237–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000a) Practices of colour classification. Mind, Culture and Society, 7(1), 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000b) Practices of seeing: Visual analysis, an ethnomethodological approach. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 157–182). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Greyson, B.
(2000) Near-death experiences. In E. Cardeña, S.J. Lynn & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (pp. 315–352). Washington DC: The American Psychological Association. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurney, E., Myers, F.W.H.,& Podmore, F.
(1886) Phantasms of the living Vol. 21. London: Trubner.Google Scholar
Hartswood, M., Proctor, R., Rouncefield, M., & Slack, R.
(2001) Performance management in breast screening: A case of professional vision and ecologies of practice. Journal of Cognition, Technology and Work, 4(2), 91–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, D.
(1982) Exploring inner space: Science and religious experience. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Heath, C. & Luff, P.
(2000) Technology in action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J.
(1984) Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
(2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012b) The epistemic engine: Sequence organisation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G.
(2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C.
(2000) Sharing the tools of the trade: The interactional constitution of workplace objects. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29(5), 523–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hufford, D.
(1982) The terror that comes in the night: An experience-centred study of supernatural assault traditions. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, J., & Luke, D.
(Eds.) (2014) Talking with spirits: Ethnographies from between the worlds. Brisbane, Australia: Daily Grail Publishing.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G.
(1979) A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas, (Ed.). Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. PAGES). New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
(1984) On the organization of laughter in talk about troubles. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 346–370). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, G., Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E.A.
(1987) Notes on laughter in pursuit of intimacy. In G. Button & J.R.E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social structure (pp. 152–205). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kochmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P.
(2010) ‘Can you see the cystic artery yet?’: A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 521–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S.
(1979) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laurier, E., & Brown, B.
Cultures of seeing: Pedagogies of the riverbank. Unpublished MS. Available at [URL]
Law, J., & Lynch, M.
(1988) Lists, field guides and the descriptive organization of seeing: Birdwatching as an exemplary observational activity. Human Studies, 11(2-3), 217–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L.
(2013) Displaying, contesting and negotiating epistemic authority in social interaction: Descriptions and questions in guided tours. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 597–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N.R.
(2005) The dark side of tellabillity. Narrative Inquiry, 15(2), 323–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohashi, Y., Wooffitt, R., Jackson, C., & Nixon, Y.
(2013) Discourse, culture and extraordinary experiences: Observations from a comparative, qualitative analysis of Japanese and UK English accounts of paranormal phenomena. Western Journal of Communication, 77(4), 466–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, A.M.
(1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 91, 219–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, J.
(1996) Representing reality. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Psathas, G.
(1991) The structure of direction giving in interaction. In D. Boden & D.H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology andconversation analysis. California: California University Press.Google Scholar
Rhine, L.E.
(1981) The invisible picture: A study of psychic experiences. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Google Scholar
Sacks, H.
(1992) Lectures on conversation Vols. I & II1. edited by G. Jefferson & E.A. Schegloff. Oxford & Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E.A.
(1997) Narrative analysis: Thirty years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1-4), 97–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, I.
(1970) Telepathic impressions: A review and report of thirty-five new cases. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Stivers, T.
(2005) Modified repeats: One method for asserting primary rights from second position. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(2), 131–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J.
(Eds.) (2011) The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Totten, N.
(Ed.) (2003) Psychoanalysis and the paranormal: Lands of darkness. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
Weeks, P.A.D.
(1995) The micrsociology of everyday life. In S.M. Hale (Ed.), Controversies in sociology (2nd Edn.). Toronto: Copp Clark Ltd.Google Scholar
Widdicombe, S., & Wooffitt, R.
(1995) The language of youth subcultures: Social identity in action. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C.
(2006) Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wooffitt, R.
(1992) Telling tales of the unexpected: The organisation of factual discourse. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Wooffitt, R., & Widdicombe, S.
(2006) Interaction in interviews. In P. Drew, G. Raymond & D. Weinberg (Eds.), Talk and interaction in social research methods (pp. 28–49). London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, D.E., & Goulet, J-G.
(Eds.) (1994) Being changed by cross-cultural encounters: The anthropology of extraordinary experience. Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

Bardina, Svetlana
2021. ‘That’s what the dream says’: The use of normalizing devices in dream reports. Discourse Studies  pp. 146144562110016 ff. DOI logo
Hayward, Rachael, Robin Wooffitt & Catherine Woods
2015. The transgressivethat: Making the world uncanny. Discourse Studies 17:6  pp. 703 ff. DOI logo
Ironside, Rachael
2017. Discovering strange events in empty spaces: The role of multimodal practice and the interpretation of paranormal events. Journal of Pragmatics 120  pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Ironside, Rachael
2018. Feeling spirits: sharing subjective paranormal experience through embodied talk and action. Text & Talk 38:6  pp. 705 ff. DOI logo
Ironside, Rachael & Robin Wooffitt
2021. Language, Embodiment and Anomalous Experience. In Making Sense of the Paranormal,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ironside, Rachael & Robin Wooffitt
2021. What Is That?. In Making Sense of the Paranormal,  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Jackson, Clare
2016. ‘I sort of did stuff to him’. Narrative Inquiry 26:1  pp. 150 ff. DOI logo
McVittie, Chris & Andy McKinlay
2023. “I don't mean extradimensional in a woo-woo sense”: Doing non-explanation in discussions of unidentified aerial phenomena. Language & Communication 88  pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Pérez Navarro, José M. & Xana Martínez Guerra
2020. Personality, cognition, and morbidity in the understanding of paranormal belief. PsyCh Journal 9:1  pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Pérez Navarro, José Miguel
2020. Factores cognitivos, mórbidos y premórbidos en la formación y sustento de la creencia en lo paranormal. Interdisciplinaria Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines 37:2  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Stockbridge, Germaine & Robin Wooffitt
2019. Coincidence by design. Qualitative Research 19:4  pp. 437 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.