Between word and text in life narratives
Using discourse synthesis to model processes
The purpose of this essay is to examine the relationships between “the oral” and “the written” in a particular application of narrative research (life rendering research). First, we examine a functional and valuing contrast between oral and written language within oral history methods. Second, we present a critical examination of the use of these linguistic predispositions as they impact life history narratives. Next, we examine a particularly close analogy between oral history and psychiatric patient write-up. Finally, the historical oral/written tension located in oral history practice is located within the frameworks of newer, media-based literacies. The tensions that these intentions create are particularly acute in power-based relationships, such as those between interviewers and informants. Therefore, the organization of the paper is a series of issues that combine to form a critical look at the use of informants’ words in the written narratives of the oral history as a form of discourse synthesis (Spivey, 1997).
References (55)
Albers, P. (2007). Finding the artist within: Creating and reading visual texts in the English language arts classroom. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barrett, R. (1999). The writing-talking cure: An ethnography of record-speech events in a psychiatric hospital. In C. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes, and practices (pp. 244–266). New York, NY: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baum, W. (1987). Oral history for the local historical society, (3rd ed.). Nashville, TN: AASLH.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, C.S. (1988). Like it was: A complete guide to writing oral history. New York, NY: Teachers and Writers Collaborative.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bleich, D. (1978). Subjective criticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caunce, S. (1994). Oral history and the local historian. London, UK: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clough, P. (1998). The end(s) of ethnography: From realism to social criticism, 2nd. Ed. New York, NY: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Daniels, A. (1983). Self-deception and self-discovery in fieldwork. Qualitative Sociology, 61, 195–214 ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frisch, M. (1990). A shared authority: Essays on the craft and meaning of oral and public history. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grosswiler, P. (1998). Method is the message: Rethinking McLuhan through critical theory. Montreal: Black Rose Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M.A.K., & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. New York, NY: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jahandarie, K. (1999). Spoken and written discourse: An interdisciplinary perspective. Stamford, CT: Ablex.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, R. (2004). Blended voices: Crafting narrative from oral history interviews. Oral History Review, 31(1), 23–42. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
King, J. (1990). Collaborative life history narratives: Heroes in reading teachers’ tales. Qualitative Studies in Education, 4(1), 45–60. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
King, J., Stahl, N.A., & Barksdale, M. (December, 2002). Interpretive issues in using oral and life history methods in education. Paper presented at the
National Reading Conference
.
Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2007). A new literacies sampler. New York, NY: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lummis, T. (1988). Listening to history: The authenticity of oral evidence. Totowa, NJ: Barnes and Noble Books.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luttrell, W. (1996). Taking care of literacy: One feminist’s critique. Educational Policy, 101, 342–65. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McLuhan, M. (1970). Culture is our business. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, R. (1994). Fault lines in the contact zone. College English, 561, 389–408. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newkirk, T. (1996). Seduction and betrayal in qualitative research. In P. Mortensen & G. Kirsch (Eds.), Ethics and representation in qualitative studies of literacy (pp. 3–16). Urbana, IL: NCTE.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olson, D. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 471, 257–281. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olson, D. (1994). The world on paper. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Olson, G. (1999). Encountering the other: Postcolonial theory and composition scholarship. In F. Gale, P. Sipiora, & J. Kinneavy (Eds.), Ethical issues in college writing (pp. 91–105). New York, NY: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ong, W. (1967). The presence of the word. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy - The technologizing of the word. London, UK: Metheun. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ong, W. (1985). Writing and the evolution of consciousness. Mosaic, 181, 1–10.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pratt, M (1992). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. New York, NY: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pratt, M. (1991). Art of the contact zone. Profession, 911, 33–40. New York, NY: Modern Language Association.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preuss, G. (2004, September 9). Editing confusion. [URL]
Raffel, S. (1979). Matters of fact: A sociological inquiry. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rose, G. (2003). Visual methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sarbin, T.R. (Ed.). (1986). Narrative psychology: The storied nature of human contact. Westport, CN: Praeger.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shopes, L. (2003). Sharing authority. Oral History Review, 301, 103–110. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sitzia, L. (2003). A shared authority: An impossible goal? Oral History Review, 301, 87–101. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey, N. (1997). The constructivist metaphor: Reading, writing, and the making of meaning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spivey, N., & King, J. (1990). Readers as writers composing from sources. Reading Research Quarterly, 24 (2), 7–26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, P. (1988). The voice of the past: Oral history. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Welsh, J., Kozdras, D., King, J., & Schneider, J. (2009). Media literacy summer camps. In J. Richards & C. Lassonde (Eds.), Literacy tutoring that works: A look at successful in-school, after-school and summer programs (pp. 182–195). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yow, V. (1995). Ethics and interpersonal relationships. Oral History Review, 221, 51–66. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yow, V. (2004, September 7). Editing confusion. [URL]
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Nelson, Nancy & James R. King
2023.
Discourse synthesis: Textual transformations in writing from sources.
Reading and Writing 36:4
► pp. 769 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.