References
Ahlberg, Malin, Lars Borin, Markus Forsberg, Martin Hammarstedt, Leif-Jöran Olsson, Olof Olsson, Johan Roxendal & Jonatan Uppström
2013Korp and Karp – a bestiary of language resources: The research infrastructure of Språkbanken. In Proceedings of Nodalida 2013, 429–433. Linköping: LiUEP.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra & R. M. W. Dixon
2002Word: A typological framework. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allén, Sture
1967Studier över nusvenskans vokabulärsystem [Studies on the vocabulary system of modern Swedish]. Research report. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Dept. of Scandinavian Languages.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2001Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Collin F., Charles J. Fillmore & John B. Lowe
1998The Berkeley FrameNet project. In Proceedings of Coling 1998, 86–90. Montréal: ACL.Google Scholar
Bechhofer, Sean, Frank van Harmelen, Jim Hendler, Ian Horrocks, Deborah McGuinness, Peter Patel-Schneijder & Lynn Andrea Stein
2004OWL Web Ontology Language reference. Research report. Online: W3C.Google Scholar
Bender, Emily M.
2011On achieving and evaluating language-independence in NLP. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology 6(3). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Linguistic typology in natural language processing. Linguistic Typology 20(3): 645–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borin, Lars
2010Med Zipf mot framtiden – en integrerad lexikonresurs för svensk språkteknologi [With Zipf into the future – an integrated lexical resource for Swedish language technology]. LexicoNordica 17: 35–54.Google Scholar
Borin, Lars, Jens Allwood & Gerard de Melo
2014Bring vs. MTRoget: Evaluating automatic thesaurus translation. In Proceedings of LREC 2014, 2115–2121. Reykjavik: ELRA.Google Scholar
Borin, Lars, Bernard Comrie & Anju Saxena
2013The Intercontinental Dictionary Series – a rich and principled database for language comparison. In Lars Borin & Anju Saxena (eds.), Approaches to measuring linguistic differences, 285–302. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borin, Lars, Markus Forsberg & Christer Ahlberger
2011Semantic search in literature as an e-Humanities research tool: CONPLISIT – consumption patterns and life-style in 19th century Swedish literature. In Proceedings of Nodalida 2011, 58–65. Linköping: LiUEP.Google Scholar
Borin, Lars, Markus Forsberg & Lennart Lönngren
2008The hunting of the BLARK – SALDO, a freely available lexical database for Swedish language technology. In Joakim Nivre, Mats Dahllöf & Beáta Megyesi (eds.), Resourceful language technology: Festschrift in honor of Anna Sågvall Hein, 21–32. Uppsala: Uppsala University, Department of Linguistics & Philology.Google Scholar
2013SALDO: A touch of yin to WordNet’s yang. Language Resources and Evaluation 47(4): 1191–1211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borin, Lars, Markus Forsberg, Leif-Jöran Olsson, Olof Olsson & Jonatan Uppström
2013The lexical editing system of Karp. In Proceedings of eLex 2013, 503–516. Ljubljana: Trojina, Institute for Applied Slovene Studies.Google Scholar
Borin, Lars, Markus Forsberg, Leif-Jöran Olsson & Jonatan Uppström
2012The open lexical infrastructure of Språkbanken. In Proceedings of LREC 2012, 3598–3602. Istanbul: ELRA.Google Scholar
Borin, Lars, Markus Forsberg & Johan Roxendal
2012Korp – the corpus infrastructure of Språkbanken. In Proceedings of LREC 2012, 474–478. Istanbul: ELRA.Google Scholar
Borin, Lars, Maria Toporowska Gronostaj & Dimitrios Kokkinakis
2007Medical frames as target and tool. In Proceedings of the Nodalida workshop FRAME 2007: Building frame semantics resources for Scandinavian and Baltic languages, 11–18. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Brickley, Dan & R. V. Guha
2004RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF Schema. Research report. Online: W3C.Google Scholar
Church, Kenneth & Mark Liberman
2021The future of computational linguistics: On beyond alchemy. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4(625341): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dannélls, Dana
2010Applying semantic frame theory to automate natural language templates generation from ontology statements. In Proceedings of INLG 2010, 179–184. Dublin: ACL.Google Scholar
de Melo, Gerard
2014Etymological WordNet: Tracing the history of words. In Proceedings of LREC 2014, 1148–1154. Reykjavik: ELRA.Google Scholar
de Melo, Gerard & Gerhard Weikum
2008Mapping Roget’s Thesaurus and WordNet to French. In Proceedings of LREC 2008, 3306–3313. Marrakech: ELRA.Google Scholar
2012aConstructing and utilizing wordnets using statistical methods. Language Resources and Evaluation 46: 287–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012bUWN: A large multilingual lexical knowledge base. In Proceedings of ACL 2012: System demonstrations, 151–156. Jeju: ACL.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane
(ed.) 1998bWordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane & Piek Vossen
2012Challenges for a multilingual wordnet. Language Resources and Evaluation 46: 313–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–137. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Christopher R. Johnson & Miriam R. L. Petruck
2003Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography 16(3): 235–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, Markus, Richard Johansson, Linnéa Bäckström, Lars Borin, Benjamin Lyngfelt, Joel Olofsson & Julia Prentice
Francis, W. Nelson & Henry Kučera
1964Manual of information to accompany A Standard Corpus of Present-Day Edited American English, for use with digital computers. Research report. Providence: Brown University, Dept. Linguistics. Providence.Google Scholar
Francopoulo, Gil
(ed.) 2013LMF: Lexical markup framework. London: ISTE/Wiley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff
2001Lexico-semantic universals: A critical overview. Linguistic Typology 5: 1–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Rebecca, Bonnie J. Dorr & Philip Resnik
2004Inducing frame semantic verb classes from WordNet and LDOCE. In Proceedings of ACL 2004, 375–382. Barcelona: ACL. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2011bThe indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45(1): 31–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Uri Tadmor
(eds.) 2009Loanwords in the world’s languages: A comparative handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holman, Eric W., Søren Wichmann, Cecil H. Brown, Viveka Velupillai, André Müller & Dik Bakker
2008Explorations in automated language classification. Folia Linguistica 42(2): 331–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-ren, Nicoletta Calzolari, Aldo Gangemi, Alessandro Lenci, Alessandro Oltramari & Laurent Prevot
(eds.) 2010Ontology and the lexicon: A natural language processing perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ISO
2019Language resource management – Lexical Markup Framework (LMF) – Part 1: Core model. ISO 24613-1:2019. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
Jäger, Gerhard
2012Power laws and other heavy-tailed distributions in linguistic typology. Advances in Complex Systems 15(3–4). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Richard & Pierre Nugues
2005Using parallel corpora for automatic transfer of FrameNet annotation. In Proceedings of the 1st ROMANCE FrameNet workshop, 26–28. Cluj-Napoca.Google Scholar
2006A FrameNet-based semantic role labeler for Swedish. In Proceedings of Coling/ACL 2006, 436–443. Sydney: ACL. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Miloś Husák, Katy McAdam, Michael Rundell & Pavel Rychlý
2008GDEX: Automatically finding good dictionary examples in a corpus. In Proceedings of EURALEX 2008, 425–432. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Kokkinakis, Dimitrios & Maria Toporowska Gronostaj
2010Linking SweFN++ with medical resources: Towards a MedFrameNet for Swedish. In Proceedings of Louhi at NAACL-HLT 2010, 68–71. Los Angeles: ACL.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2012New directions in lexical typology. Linguistics 50(3): 373–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Martine Vanhove & Peter Koch
2007Typological approaches to lexical semantics. Linguistic Typology 11: 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
List, Johann-Mattis, Michael Cysouw & Robert Forkel
2016Concepticon: A resource for the linking of concept lists. In Proceedings of LREC 2016, 2393–2400. Portorož: ELRA.Google Scholar
Lyngfelt, Benjamin, Lars Borin, Markus Forsberg, Julia Prentice, Rudolf Rydstedt, Emma Sköldberg & Sofia Tingsell
2012Adding a constructicon to the Swedish resource network of Språkbanken. In Proceedings of KONVENS 2012 (LexSem 2012 workshop), 452–461. Vienna: ÖGAI.Google Scholar
Lyngfelt, Benjamin, Lars Borin, Kyoko Ohara & Tiago Timponi Torrent
(eds.) 2018Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manning, Christopher D.
2015Last words: Computational linguistics and deep learning. Computational Linguistics 41(4): 701–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moon, Rosamund
2000Lexicography and disambiguation: The size of the problem. Computers and the Humanities 34(1–2): 99–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navigli, Roberto & Simone Paolo Ponzetto
2012BabelNet: The automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage semantic network. Artificial Intelligence 193: 217–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piantadosi, Steven T.
2014Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21(625341): 1112–1130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Lilla Magyar
2020Headedness and the lexicon: The case of verb-to-noun ratios. Languages 5(1/9): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reiter, Ehud
2007The shrinking horizons of computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics 33(2): 283–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richards, Jack C.
1985The context of language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roget, Mark Peter
1852Thesaurus of English words and phrases. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Swadesh, Morris
1950Salish internal relationships. International Journal of American Linguistics 16: 157–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1952Lexico-statistic dating of prehistoric ethnic contacts: With special reference to North American Indians and Eskimos. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96(4): 452–463.Google Scholar
1955Towards greater accuracy in lexicostatistic dating. International Journal of American Linguistics 21: 121–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swartz, Merryanna L.
1992Issues for tutoring knowledge in foreign language intelligent tutoring systems. In Merryanna L. Swartz & Masoud Yazdani (eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems for foreign language learning, 219–233. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrent, Tiago Timponi, Lars Borin & Collin Baker
(eds.) 2018Proceedings of the International FrameNet workshop 2018: Multilingual framenets and constructicons. Miyazaki: ELRA.Google Scholar
Vossen, Piek
(ed.) 1998aEuroWordNet: A multilingual database with lexical semantic networks for European languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Yorick
2009Ontotherapy, or how to stop worrying about what there is. In Nicolas Nicolov, Galia Angelova & Ruslan Mitkov (eds.), Recent advances in natural language processing V, 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wintner, Shuly
2009What science underlies natural language engineering? Computational Linguistics 35(4): 641–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, George Kingsley
1949Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar