Article published in:
Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issuesEdited by Yorick Wilks
[Natural Language Processing 8] 2010
► pp. 63–74
Robots should be slaves
Robots should not be described as persons, nor given legal nor moral responsibility for their actions. Robots are fully owned by us. We determine their goals and behavior, either directly or indirectly through specifying their intelligence or how their intelligence is acquired. In humanising them, we not only further dehumanise real people, but also encourage poor human decision making in the allocation of resources and responsibility. This is true at both the individual and the institutional level. This chapter describes both causes and consequences of these errors, including consequences already present in society. I make specific proposals for best incorporating robots into our society. The potential of robotics should be understood as the potential to extend our own abilities and to address our own goals.
Published online: 24 March 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.11bry
https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.8.11bry
Cited by
Cited by 86 other publications
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 1 ff. 
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 29 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 48 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 61 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 89 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 109 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 124 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 139 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 159 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 175 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 198 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 217 ff.
No author info given
2020.
In Killer Apps,
► pp. 235 ff.
Afonso, Oscar
2021. The Oscar goes to … robots or humans? Competition in a directed technical change model with monetary policy.
Economics of Innovation and New Technology ► pp. 1 ff.
Andreotta, Adam J.
2021. The hard problem of AI rights.
AI & SOCIETY 36:1 ► pp. 19 ff.
Banks, Jaime
2020. Optimus Primed: Media Cultivation of Robot Mental Models and Social Judgments.
Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7
Banks, Jaime
2020. Theory of Mind in Social Robots: Replication of Five Established Human Tests.
International Journal of Social Robotics 12:2 ► pp. 403 ff.
Banks, Jaime & Autumn Edwards
2019.
In 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN),
► pp. 1 ff.
Birhane, Abeba & Jelle van Dijk
2020.
In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society,
► pp. 207 ff.
Bloom, Peter
2020.
In Identity, Institutions and Governance in an AI World,
► pp. 211 ff.
BRYSON, JOANNA J.
2012. A ROLE FOR CONSCIOUSNESS IN ACTION SELECTION.
International Journal of Machine Consciousness 04:02 ► pp. 471 ff.
Bryson, Joanna J.
2018. Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics.
Ethics and Information Technology 20:1 ► pp. 15 ff.
Cappuccio, Massimiliano L., Anco Peeters & William McDonald
2020. Sympathy for Dolores: Moral Consideration for Robots Based on Virtue and Recognition.
Philosophy & Technology 33:1 ► pp. 9 ff.
Cave, Stephen, Rune Nyrup, Karina Vold & Adrian Weller
2019. Motivations and Risks of Machine Ethics.
Proceedings of the IEEE 107:3 ► pp. 562 ff.
Chomanski, Bartek
2019. What’s Wrong with Designing People to Serve?.
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22:4 ► pp. 993 ff.
Chomanski, Bartek
2021. Liability for Robots: Sidestepping the Gaps.
Philosophy & Technology
Chomanski, Bartlomiej
2020. If robots are people, can they be made for profit? Commercial implications of robot personhood.
AI and Ethics
Clegg, Stewart, Marco Berti, Ace Volkmann Simpson & Miguel Pina e Cunha
2020.
In Handbook of Practical Wisdom in Business and Management [International Handbooks in Business Ethics, ],
► pp. 1 ff.
Coeckelbergh, Mark
2015. The tragedy of the master: automation, vulnerability, and distance.
Ethics and Information Technology 17:3 ► pp. 219 ff.
Coeckelbergh, Mark
2018. How to describe and evaluate “deception” phenomena: recasting the metaphysics, ethics, and politics of ICTs in terms of magic and performance and taking a relational and narrative turn.
Ethics and Information Technology 20:2 ► pp. 71 ff.
Coeckelbergh, Mark
2018. Why Care About Robots? Empathy, Moral Standing, and the Language of Suffering.
Kairos. Journal of Philosophy & Science 20:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
Coeckelbergh, Mark
2021. Three Responses to Anthropomorphism in Social Robotics: Towards a Critical, Relational, and Hermeneutic Approach.
International Journal of Social Robotics
Conner, Thomas
2019. Robot Rights.
New Media & Society 21:6 ► pp. 1411 ff.
Danaher, John
2020. Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism.
Science and Engineering Ethics 26:4 ► pp. 2023 ff.
de Jong, Roos
2020. The Retribution-Gap and Responsibility-Loci Related to Robots and Automated Technologies: A Reply to Nyholm.
Science and Engineering Ethics 26:2 ► pp. 727 ff.
Erel, Hadas, Tzachi Shem Tov, Yoav Kessler & Oren Zuckerman
2019.
In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
► pp. 1 ff.
Fossa, Fabio
2018. Artificial moral agents: moral mentors or sensible tools?.
Ethics and Information Technology 20:2 ► pp. 115 ff.
Friedman, Cindy
2020.
In Artificial Intelligence Research [Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1342],
► pp. 3 ff.
Galanter, Philip
2020. Towards Ethical Relationships with Machines That Make Art.
Artnodes :26
Goldsmith, Judy & Nicholas Mattei
2014. Fiction as an Introduction to Computer Science Research.
ACM Transactions on Computing Education 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gordon, John-Stewart
2020. What do we owe to intelligent robots?.
AI & SOCIETY 35:1 ► pp. 209 ff.
Gordon, John-Stewart & Vladislav V. Fomin
2019.
In Corporate Standardization Management and Innovation [Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development, ],
► pp. 177 ff.
Gunkel, David J.
2015.
In Machine Medical Ethics [Intelligent Systems, Control and Automation: Science and Engineering, 74],
► pp. 151 ff.
Gunkel, David J.
2018. The other question: can and should robots have rights?.
Ethics and Information Technology 20:2 ► pp. 87 ff.
Gunkel, David J.
2020. Mind the gap: responsible robotics and the problem of responsibility.
Ethics and Information Technology 22:4 ► pp. 307 ff.
Gunkel, David J. & Jordan Joseph Wales
2021. Debate: what is personhood in the age of AI?.
AI & SOCIETY
Hauskeller, Michael
2016.
In Mythologies of Transhumanism,
► pp. 181 ff.
Hawley, Scott H.
2019.
In The Transhumanism Handbook,
► pp. 271 ff.
Huber, Andreas, Astrid Weiss & Marjo Rauhala
2016.
In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI),
► pp. 367 ff.
Kempt, Hendrik
2020.
In Chatbots and the Domestication of AI [Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI, ],
► pp. 77 ff.
Kempt, Hendrik
2020.
In Chatbots and the Domestication of AI [Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI, ],
► pp. 137 ff.
Kubes, Tanja
2020.
In Maschinenliebe,
► pp. 163 ff.
Kukita, Minao
2020. Robot Ethics.
Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan 38:1 ► pp. 18 ff.
Lima, Gabriel, Chihyung Jeon, Meeyoung Cha & Kyungsin Park
2020.
In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
► pp. 1 ff.
Loh, Janina
2019.
In Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion,
► pp. 352 ff.
Mildenberger, Carl David
2019. Employing Robots.
Disputatio 11:53 ► pp. 89 ff.
Miller, Lantz Fleming
2015. Granting Automata Human Rights: Challenge to a Basis of Full-Rights Privilege.
Human Rights Review 16:4 ► pp. 369 ff.
Miller, Lantz Fleming
2020. Responsible research for the construction of maximally humanlike automata: the paradox of unattainable informed consent.
Ethics and Information Technology 22:4 ► pp. 297 ff.
Mosakas, Kestutis
2020. On the moral status of social robots: considering the consciousness criterion.
AI & SOCIETY
Musiał, Maciej
2019.
In Enchanting Robots [Social and Cultural Studies of Robots and AI, ],
► pp. 11 ff.
Nyholm, Sven & Jilles Smids
2020. Can a Robot Be a Good Colleague?.
Science and Engineering Ethics 26:4 ► pp. 2169 ff.
Parviainen, Jaana & Mark Coeckelbergh
2020. The political choreography of the Sophia robot: beyond robot rights and citizenship to political performances for the social robotics market.
AI & SOCIETY
Pelau, Corina, Dan Cristian Dabija & Irina Ene
2021. What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics on the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry.
Computers in Human Behavior ► pp. 106855 ff.
Peltu, Malcolm & Yorick Wilks
2008. Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues.
SSRN Electronic Journal
Prescott, Tony J.
2017. Robots are not just tools.
Connection Science 29:2 ► pp. 142 ff.
Rainey, Stephen
2016. Friends, robots, citizens?.
ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 45:3 ► pp. 225 ff.
Remmers, Peter
2020.
In Mensch-Roboter-Kollaboration,
► pp. 55 ff.
Richardson, Kathleen
2016. Sex Robot Matters: Slavery, the Prostituted, and the Rights of Machines.
IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 35:2 ► pp. 46 ff.
Richardson, Kathleen
2016. The asymmetrical 'relationship'.
ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 45:3 ► pp. 290 ff.
Rieger, Stefan
2019.
In Handbuch Virtualität,
► pp. 1 ff.
Rieger, Stefan
2020.
In Handbuch Virtualität,
► pp. 167 ff.
Robbins, Scott
2020. AI and the path to envelopment: knowledge as a first step towards the responsible regulation and use of AI-powered machines.
AI & SOCIETY 35:2 ► pp. 391 ff.
Salles, Arleen, Kathinka Evers & Michele Farisco
2020. Anthropomorphism in AI.
AJOB Neuroscience 11:2 ► pp. 88 ff.
Scheessele, Michael R.
2021. The hard limit on human nonanthropocentrism.
AI & SOCIETY
Scheutz, Matthias & Thomas Arnold
2016. Feats without Heroes: Norms, Means, and Ideal Robotic Action.
Frontiers in Robotics and AI 3
Segun, Samuel T.
2021. From machine ethics to computational ethics.
AI & SOCIETY 36:1 ► pp. 263 ff.
Smids, Jilles
2020. Danaher’s Ethical Behaviourism: An Adequate Guide to Assessing the Moral Status of a Robot?.
Science and Engineering Ethics 26:5 ► pp. 2849 ff.
Solaiman, S. M.
2017. Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy.
Artificial Intelligence and Law 25:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Sotala, Kaj & Roman V Yampolskiy
2015. Responses to catastrophic AGI risk: a survey.
Physica Scripta 90:1 ► pp. 018001 ff.
Sparrow, Robert
2020. Do Robots Have Race?: Race, Social Construction, and HRI.
IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 27:3 ► pp. 144 ff.
Sparrow, Robert
2020. Robotics Has a Race Problem.
Science, Technology, & Human Values 45:3 ► pp. 538 ff.
Thurston, Thomas
2011. SLAVERY: ANNUAL BIBLIOGRAPHICAL SUPPLEMENT (2010).
Slavery & Abolition 32:4 ► pp. 607 ff.
Traue, Harald, Frank Ohl, André Brechmann, Friedhelm Schwenker, Henrik Kessler, Kerstin Limbrecht, Holger Hoffmann, Stefan Scherer, Michael Kotzyba, Andreas Scheck & Steffen Walter
2013.
In Coverbal Synchrony in Human-Machine Interaction,
► pp. 99 ff.
Zawieska, Karolina
2020. Disengagement with ethics in robotics as a tacit form of dehumanisation.
AI & SOCIETY 35:4 ► pp. 869 ff.
Zebrowski, Robin L.
2020. Fear of a Bot Planet: Anthropomorphism, Humanoid Embodiment, and Machine Consciousness.
Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness 07:01 ► pp. 119 ff.
Zhu, Jichen, Jennifer Villareale, Nithesh Javvaji, Sebastian Risi, Mathias Löwe, Rush Weigelt & Casper Harteveld
2021.
In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.