Article published in:Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues
Edited by Yorick Wilks
[Natural Language Processing 8] 2010
► pp. 179–200
Requirements for Artificial Companions
It’s harder than you think
Producing a system that meets plausible requirements for Artificial Companions (AC’s), without arbitrary restrictions, will involve solving a great many problems that are currently beyond the state of the art in Artificial Intelligence (AI); including problems that would arise in the design of robotic Companions helping an owner by performing practical tasks in the physical environment. In other words, even if the AC is not itself a robot and interacts with the user only via input devices such as camera, microphone, keyboard, mouse, touch-pad, and touch-screen, and output devices such as screen and audio output devices, nevertheless it will, in some circumstances, need the visual competences, the ontology, the representational resources, the reasoning competences, the planning competences, and the problem-solving competences that a helpful domestic robot would need. This is because some of the intended beneficiaries of ACs will need to be given advice about what physical actions to perform, what physical devices to acquire, and how to use such devices. I shall give examples illustrating the need for such competences.
Published online: 24 March 2010
Cited by 3 other publications
Payr, Sabine, Marcin Skowron, Anna Dobrosovestnova, Martin Trapp & Robert Trappl
Traue, Harald, Frank Ohl, André Brechmann, Friedhelm Schwenker, Henrik Kessler, Kerstin Limbrecht, Holger Hoffmann, Stefan Scherer, Michael Kotzyba, Andreas Scheck & Steffen Walter
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.