Cover not available
Article published In:
NOWELE
Vol. 71:1 (2018) ► pp.56–98

Verb-third in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch

| Queen Mary University of London,
This article investigates the status of so-called verb-final declaratives in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch, with a focus on whether clauses in which there is no apparent subordinator and the finite verb occurs later than the expected verb-first or verb-second position can be treated as verb-third (V3) clauses, as they are defined for Old High German in works such as Axel (2007) and Tomaselli (1995). Drawing on a set of 746 clauses, I argue that there is no evidence that the finite verbs in these clauses have undergone verb movement, as is claimed in the aforementioned works, nor are the asyndetic verb-late clauses with a verb in surface third position consistent with the patterns identified in the generative literature for the V3 type.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A review of literature that deals with the V3 clause type in OHG
  • 3.A clausal typology of Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch
    • 3.1Determining clause type in Otfrid
    • 3.2Clause types and their frequencies
      • 3.2.1V1/V2 and Verb-late clauses – clauses with unambiguous left or right bracket finite verbs
      • 3.2.2Ambiguous clauses
      • 3.2.3Asyndetic verb-late clauses
  • 4.Are there V3 clauses in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch?
    • 4.1Verb movement in V3 clauses?
    • 4.2Is there a V3 clause type in Otfrid?
      • 4.2.1Claim 1: Violations of verb-second in OHG are V3 and show the order XP-SubjPro-Vfin
      • 4.2.2Claim 2: Pronominal subjects, pronominal objects and light adverbs are most frequently attested in V3(+) clauses, full DP/NP subjects and objects more rarely, PPs not at all
      • 4.2.3Claim 3: Intervening constituents in V3 (and V4(+)?) constructions are discourse-given
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00004.som
References (43)
References
Antonsen, E. 1975. A concise grammar of the older runic inscriptions. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bech, K. 2001. Word order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Behaghel, O. 1932. Deutsche Syntax. vol. IV1. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Bible Gateway, ESV Bible. Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. [URL].
Bostock, J. K. 1976. A handbook on Old High German literature. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dal, I. 1966. Kurze deutsche Syntax auf historischer Grundlage. 3rd edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Dresher, E. B., Lahiri, A. 2003. Main stress left in Early Middle English. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. University of Copenhagen, 11th–15th August 2003.
Ebert, R. P. 1978. Historische Syntax des Deutschen. Stuttgart: Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggers, H. (ed.). 1964. Der althochdeutsche Isidor. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Eggenberger, J. 1961. Das Subjektpronomen im Althochdeutschen. Ein syntaktischer Beitrag zur Frühgeschichte des deutschen Schrifttums. Grabs: Selbstverlag.Google Scholar
Ekerot, L. 1988. Så-konstruktionen i svenskan: konstruktionstypen “om vädret tillåter, så genomföres övingen” i funktionellt grammatiskt perspektiv. Lund: Lund.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, T. 1995. Verbal syntax in the early Germanic languages. Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell University.Google Scholar
Hall, T. A. 1999. Phonotactics and the prosodic structure of German function words. In T. A. Hall, U. Kleinherz (eds.), Studies on the phonological word. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harbert, W. 2007. The Germanic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, R., Petrova, S. 2010. From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 1201. 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. 1975. The syntax of the simple sentence in Proto-Germanic. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, O., Safir, K. 1989. The null-subject parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli, K. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, A. 2005. Negation in Old High German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 241. 227–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, W. 1997. Another look at clitics in Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 951. 73–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenerz, J. 1985. Diachronic syntax: Verb position and COMP in German. In J. Toman (ed.), Studies in German grammar, 103–132. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, W. 1968. Historical German syntax. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Magoun, F. 1943a. Otfrid’s Ad Liutbertum . PMLA 58(4). 869–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1943b. Otfrid’s Ad Liutbertum and OHG Tatian. Modern Languages Notes 58(5). 357–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Näf, A. 1979. Die Wortstellung in Notkers Consolatio. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrova, S. 2006. A discourse-based approach to verb placement in Early West-Germanic. In S. Ishihara, M. Schmitz, A. Schwarz (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure (ISIS) 5, 1–32. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Petrova, S., Solf, M. 2008. Rhetorical relations and verb placement in the Early Germanic languages: A cross-linguistic perspective. In C. Fabricius-Hansen, W. Ramm (eds.), “Subordination” versus “coordination” in sentence and text: A cross-linguistic perspective, 329–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piper, P. (ed.). 1884. Otfrids Evangelienbuch. II. Teil: Glossar und Abriss der Grammatik. Freiburg: Akademische Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Robinson, O. W. 1997. Clause subordination and verb placement in the Old High German ‘Isidor’ translation. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, B. W. 1999. Morphology-Driven Syntax: a Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-drop. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russom, G. 2001. Metrical evidence for subordinate stress in Old English. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 131. 39–64.Google Scholar
Schrodt, R. 2004. Althochdeutsche Grammatik II: Syntax. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sievers, E. (ed.). 1961. Tatian: Lateinisch und altdeutsch mit ausführlichem Glossar. 2nd edn. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Somers, K., Dubenion-Smith, S. 2014. The intersection between syntax and meter in the Old Saxon Hêliand . Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 721. 83–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Somers Wicka, K. 2009. From phonology to syntax: Pronominal cliticization in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, J. 2007. Variable use of negation in Middle Low German. In J. Salmons, S. Dubenion-Smith (eds.), Historical linguistics 2005: Selected papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Madison, 31 July–5 August 2005. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TITUS edition of Otfrid Evangelienbuch. Last modified August 23, 2010. [URL].
Tomaselli, A. 1995. Cases of verb-third in Old High German. In A. Battye, I. Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 345–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vollmann-Profe, G. (ed.). 1987. Otfrid von Weissenburg. Evangelienbuch. Althochdeutsch/Neuhochdeutsch. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Walkden, G. 2014. Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wissmann, W. 1960. Zum althochdeutschen Tatian. In W. Krause (ed.), Indogermanica. Festschrift für Wolfgang Krause, 249–267. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Wöllstein-Leisten, A., Heilmann, A., Stepan, P., Vikner, S. 1997. Deutsche Satzstruktur. Grundlagen der syntaktischen Analyse. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wunder, D. 1965. Der Nebensatz bei Otfrid. Untersuchungen zur Syntax des deutschen Nebensatzes. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Petrova, Svetlana
2023. Hauptsätze mit Verbspäterstellung im Althochdeutschen: Bestand, Distribution, Interpretation . Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 145:4 ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Somers, Katerina
2021. On the Grammaticality of Poetry: The Asyndetic Verb-Late Clause in Otfrid’sEvangelienbuch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 33:4 ► pp. 358 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.