Cover not available
Article published In:
NOWELE
Vol. 71:1 (2018) ► pp.56–98

Verb-third in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch

| Queen Mary University of London

This article investigates the status of so-called verb-final declaratives in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch, with a focus on whether clauses in which there is no apparent subordinator and the finite verb occurs later than the expected verb-first or verb-second position can be treated as verb-third (V3) clauses, as they are defined for Old High German in works such as Axel (2007) and Tomaselli (1995). Drawing on a set of 746 clauses, I argue that there is no evidence that the finite verbs in these clauses have undergone verb movement, as is claimed in the aforementioned works, nor are the asyndetic verb-late clauses with a verb in surface third position consistent with the patterns identified in the generative literature for the V3 type.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A review of literature that deals with the V3 clause type in OHG
  • 3.A clausal typology of Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch
    • 3.1Determining clause type in Otfrid
    • 3.2Clause types and their frequencies
      • 3.2.1V1/V2 and Verb-late clauses – clauses with unambiguous left or right bracket finite verbs
      • 3.2.2Ambiguous clauses
      • 3.2.3Asyndetic verb-late clauses
  • 4.Are there V3 clauses in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch?
    • 4.1Verb movement in V3 clauses?
    • 4.2Is there a V3 clause type in Otfrid?
      • 4.2.1Claim 1: Violations of verb-second in OHG are V3 and show the order XP-SubjPro-Vfin
      • 4.2.2Claim 2: Pronominal subjects, pronominal objects and light adverbs are most frequently attested in V3(+) clauses, full DP/NP subjects and objects more rarely, PPs not at all
      • 4.2.3Claim 3: Intervening constituents in V3 (and V4(+)?) constructions are discourse-given
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 April 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00004.som
References
Antonsen, E.
1975 A concise grammar of the older runic inscriptions. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bech, K.
2001 Word order patterns in Old and Middle English: A syntactic and pragmatic study. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Behaghel, O.
1932 Deutsche Syntax. vol. IV1. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Bible Gateway, ESV Bible
Copyright © 2001 by Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers. [URL].
Bostock, J. K.
1976 A handbook on Old High German literature. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dal, I.
1966 Kurze deutsche Syntax auf historischer Grundlage. 3rd edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Dresher, E. B., Lahiri, A.
2003 Main stress left in Early Middle English. Paper presented at the 16th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. University of Copenhagen, 11th–15th August 2003.
Ebert, R. P.
1978 Historische Syntax des Deutschen. Stuttgart: Metzler. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggers, H.
(ed.) 1964 Der althochdeutsche Isidor. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Eggenberger, J.
1961 Das Subjektpronomen im Althochdeutschen. Ein syntaktischer Beitrag zur Frühgeschichte des deutschen Schrifttums. Grabs: Selbstverlag.Google Scholar
Ekerot, L.
1988 Så-konstruktionen i svenskan: konstruktionstypen “om vädret tillåter, så genomföres övingen” i funktionellt grammatiskt perspektiv. Lund: Lund.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, T.
1995 Verbal syntax in the early Germanic languages. Ph.D. dissertation. Cornell University.Google Scholar
Hall, T. A.
1999 Phonotactics and the prosodic structure of German function words. In T. A. Hall, U. Kleinherz (eds.), Studies on the phonological word. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harbert, W.
2007 The Germanic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, R., Petrova, S.
2010 From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 1201. 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P.
1975 The syntax of the simple sentence in Proto-Germanic. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaeggli, O., Safir, K.
1989 The null-subject parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli, K. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jäger, A.
2005 Negation in Old High German. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 241. 227–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, W.
1997 Another look at clitics in Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 951. 73–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenerz, J.
1985 Diachronic syntax: Verb position and COMP in German. In J. Toman (ed.), Studies in German grammar, 103–132. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, W.
1968 Historical German syntax. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Magoun, F.
1943a Otfrid’s Ad Liutbertum . PMLA 58(4). 869–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1943b Otfrid’s Ad Liutbertum and OHG Tatian. Modern Languages Notes 58(5). 357–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Näf, A.
1979 Die Wortstellung in Notkers Consolatio. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrova, S.
2006 A discourse-based approach to verb placement in Early West-Germanic. In S. Ishihara, M. Schmitz, A. Schwarz (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies on information structure (ISIS) 5, 1–32. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Petrova, S., Solf, M.
2008 Rhetorical relations and verb placement in the Early Germanic languages: A cross-linguistic perspective. In C. Fabricius-Hansen, W. Ramm (eds.), “Subordination” versus “coordination” in sentence and text: A cross-linguistic perspective, 329–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Piper, P.
(ed.) 1884 Otfrids Evangelienbuch. II. Teil: Glossar und Abriss der Grammatik. Freiburg: Akademische Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Robinson, O. W.
1997 Clause subordination and verb placement in the Old High German ‘Isidor’ translation. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, B. W.
1999 Morphology-Driven Syntax: a Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-drop. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russom, G.
2001 Metrical evidence for subordinate stress in Old English. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 131. 39–64.Google Scholar
Schrodt, R.
2004 Althochdeutsche Grammatik II: Syntax. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sievers, E.
(ed.) 1961 Tatian: Lateinisch und altdeutsch mit ausführlichem Glossar. 2nd edn. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Somers, K., Dubenion-Smith, S.
2014 The intersection between syntax and meter in the Old Saxon Hêliand . Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 721. 83–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Somers Wicka, K.
2009 From phonology to syntax: Pronominal cliticization in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sundquist, J.
2007 Variable use of negation in Middle Low German. In J. Salmons, S. Dubenion-Smith (eds.), Historical linguistics 2005: Selected papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Madison, 31 July–5 August 2005. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
TITUS edition of Otfrid Evangelienbuch
Last modified August 23, 2010. [URL].
Tomaselli, A.
1995 Cases of verb-third in Old High German. In A. Battye, I. Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change, 345–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vollmann-Profe, G.
(ed.) 1987 Otfrid von Weissenburg. Evangelienbuch. Althochdeutsch/Neuhochdeutsch. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Walkden, G.
2014 Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wissmann, W.
1960 Zum althochdeutschen Tatian. In W. Krause (ed.), Indogermanica. Festschrift für Wolfgang Krause, 249–267. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Wöllstein-Leisten, A., Heilmann, A., Stepan, P., Vikner, S.
1997 Deutsche Satzstruktur. Grundlagen der syntaktischen Analyse. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Wunder, D.
1965 Der Nebensatz bei Otfrid. Untersuchungen zur Syntax des deutschen Nebensatzes. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Petrova, Svetlana
2023. Hauptsätze mit Verbspäterstellung im Althochdeutschen: Bestand, Distribution, Interpretation . Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 145:4 ► pp. 515 ff. DOI logo
Somers, Katerina
2021. On the Grammaticality of Poetry: The Asyndetic Verb-Late Clause in Otfrid’sEvangelienbuch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 33:4 ► pp. 358 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.