Cover not available
Article published In:
NOWELE
Vol. 72:1 (2019) ► pp.11–41

Conditional sentences in the Old East Frisian Brokmonna Bref

| University College London,
This paper offers a descriptive account of conditional sentences in the Brokmonna Bref (Brookmen’s Charter), an Old East Frisian regional law text of the thirteenth century. The text shows peculiarities of compositional design, particularly the systematised employment of verb-initial conditional sentences, attested to a lesser degree in other East Frisian texts, and which a comparative perspective reveals as sporadic outside Old Frisian. The descriptive approach provides a suitable opportunity to revisit, from the syntactic side, questions of phraseological inheritance in the language of Old Frisian law. In presenting data, this research takes initial steps towards further study of Old Frisian syntax and its relationship to West Germanic structures.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodological considerations and definitions
  • 3.V1 constructions
  • 4. Hwersa constructions
  • 5. Hwasa constructions
  • 6. Ief constructions
  • 7.Verb ellipsis
  • 8. Alsa constructions
  • 9.Occasional constructions
  • 10.Apodosis
  • 11.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00018.bre
References (54)
References
Asher, N. & A. Lascarides. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Axel, K. 2007. Studies on Old High German syntax. Left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (LA) 112. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behaghel, O. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 251. 110–142.Google Scholar
Bergen, L. van. 2003. Pronouns and word order in Old English. With particular reference to the indefinite pronoun man. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Besten, H. den. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In W. Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania – Papers from the “3rd Groningen Grammar Talks” Groningen, January 1981. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (LA) 3, 47–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Biberauer, T. 2002. Reconsidering embedded verb second: How ‘real’ is this phenomenon. Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics 81. 25–60.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, K. 1978. Remarks on the formation of conjunctions in Germanic languages. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 1(2). 99–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bremmer Jr, R. H. 2007. Language and contents of the Old Frisian manuscripts from Rüstringen (c. 1300): a “Veritable Mixed Compositum”. In R. H. Bremmer Jr., S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Advances in Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 64), 29–64. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2014. The orality of Old Frisian law texts. In R. H. Bremmer Jr., S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Directions for Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 73), 1–48. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bremmer Jr., R. H. 2017. Old English būtan / Old Frisian būta: from adverb to conjunction Another Anglo-Frisian Parallel? Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 77(3–4). 601–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buma, W. J. (ed.). 1949. Die Brokmer rechtshandschriften. The Hague: Nijhof. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buma, W. J. & W. Ebel (eds.). 1963. Altfriesische rechtsquellen. Göttingen: Musterschmidt.Google Scholar
(eds.). 1965. Das Brokmer recht. Altfriesische rechtsquellen 2. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Carlton, C. M. 1970. Descriptive syntax of the Old English charters. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cichosz, A. 2010. The influence of text type on word order of Old Germanic languages. A corpus-based contrastive study of Old English and Old High German. Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Clemoes, P. (ed.). 1997. Ælfric’s Catholic homilies. The first series text. Early English Text Society, Supplementary Series 17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. & D. Davy. 1969. Investigating English style. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Daube, D. 1956. Forms of Roman legislation. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Erdmann, O. (ed.). 1973. Otfrids Evangelienbuch. 6th edition by L. Wolff. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. et al. 2000. The syntax of early English. Cambridge Syntax Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, S., T. Kupisch & E. Rinke. 2016. Definiteness effects: Bilingual, typological and diachronic variation. In S. Fischer, T. Kupisch & E. Rinke (eds.), Definiteness effects: bilingual, typological and diachronic variation, 1–11. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Godden, M. (ed.). 1979. Ælfric’s Catholic homilies. The second series text. Early English Text Society, Supplementary Series 5. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, C. J. 2014. Two aspects of nominal style in the Seventeen Statutes and Twenty-four Landlaws . In R. H. Bremmer Jr., S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Directions for Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 73), 119–144. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Haan, G. de. 2001. Syntax of Old Frisian. In H. H. Munske (ed.), Handbuch des Friesischen/Handbook of Frisian studies, 626–36. Tübingen: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haan, G. de & F. Weerman. 1986. Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian. In H. Haider & M. Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages. Publications in Language Sciences 21, 77–110. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. & H. van Riemsdijk. 1988. Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3). 417–466.Google Scholar
Harris, A. C. & L. Campbell. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R. 1990. Chapters on legal English: Aspects past and present of the language of law. Annales Academiae scientiarum Fennicae, Series B 251. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, R. & S. Petrova. 2010. From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120(2). 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibbetson, D. 2003. How the Romans did for us: Ancient roots of the tort of negligence. UNSW Law Journal 261. 474–514.Google Scholar
Kemenade, A. van. 1987. Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English. In A. van Kemenade & N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 326–352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. 1995. Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In A. Battye & I. Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change. Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, 140–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, W. 1997. Another look at clitics in Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95(1). 73–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liebermann, F. (ed.). 1898. Die Gesetze der Angelsachsen, vol. 11: Text und Übersetzung. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Los, B. 2015. A historical syntax of English. Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language – Advanced. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lühr, R. 2007. Bedingungssätze in altfriesischen Rechtstexten. In R. H. Bremmer Jr., S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Advances in Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 64), 213–238. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Masser, A. (ed.). 1994. Die lateinisch-althochdeutsche Tatianbilingue Stiftsbibliothek St. Gallen Cod. 56. In cooperation with E. de Felip-Jaud. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mather, F. J. 1893. The conditional sentence in Anglo-Saxon. Munich: Dr. C. Wolf und Sohn. (Doctoral dissertation)Google Scholar
Meer, G. van der. 1990. On the position of the Old Frisian verbs and pronouns. In R. H. Bremmer Jr., G. van der Meer & O. Vries (eds.), Aspects of Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 31/32), 311–335. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Miller, T. (ed.) 1890–1898. The Old English version of Bede’s Ecclesiastical History, 41. vols. Early English Text Society os 95, 96, 110 and 111. London: Oxford University Press [repr. 1959–63].Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1985. Old English syntax, 21 vols. Oxford: Clarendon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Petrova, S. 2006. A discourse-based approach to verb placement in early West-Germanic. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS) 51, 153–185.Google Scholar
2011. Modelling word order variation in discourse: On the pragmatic properties of VS order in Old High German. Indo-European syntax and pragmatics: Contrastive approaches. Oslo Studies in Language 3(3). 209–228.Google Scholar
Ringe, D. & A. Taylor. 2014. A linguistic history of English, vol. II1: The development of Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwyter, J. R. 1996. Old English legal language: The lexical field of theft. NOWELE Supplement Series 15. Odense: Odense University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sedgefield, W. J. (ed.). 1899. King Alfred’s Old English version of Boethius De consolatione philosophiae. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Seebold, E. 1975. Der Aufbau des altfriesischen Brokmerbriefs. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 971, 365–395.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (ed.). 1935. Heliand. Halle (Saale): Waisenhaus.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. & S. Pintzuk. 2015. Verb order, object position, and information status in Old English. In T. Biberauer & G. Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological, and information-structural interactions. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics, 318–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, S. 1995. Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vries, O. 2007. Asega, is het dingtijd? De hoogtpunten van de Oudfriese. Leeuwarden-Utrecht: Sterk.Google Scholar
Walkden, G. 2014. Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 12. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, S. 2005. Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring. In M. Everaert, H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 51, 227–341. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bremmer Jr, Rolf H.
2022. Reading Old Frisian laws as literature. Studia Neophilologica ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bremmer Jr, Rolf H.
2021. Bilan des études sur le vieux-frison (1992-2021). Revue germanique internationale :34 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.