Article published in:
NOWELE
Vol. 72:1 (2019) ► pp. 1141
References

References

Asher, N. & A. Lascarides
2003Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Axel, K.
2007Studies on Old High German syntax. Left sentence periphery, verb placement and verb-second. Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (LA) 112. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behaghel, O.
1909Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25. 110–142.Google Scholar
Bergen, L. van
2003Pronouns and word order in Old English. With particular reference to the indefinite pronoun man. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Besten, H. den
1983On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In W. Abraham (ed.), On the formal syntax of the Westgermania – Papers from the “3rd Groningen Grammar Talks” Groningen, January 1981 Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (LA) 3, 47–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Biberauer, T.
2002Reconsidering embedded verb second: How ‘real’ is this phenomenon. Working Papers in English and Applied Linguistics 8. 25–60.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, K.
1978Remarks on the formation of conjunctions in Germanic languages. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 1(2). 99–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer Jr, R. H.
2007Language and contents of the Old Frisian manuscripts from Rüstringen (c. 1300): a “Veritable Mixed Compositum”. In R. H. Bremmer Jr., S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Advances in Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 64), 29–64. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2014The orality of Old Frisian law texts. In R. H. Bremmer Jr., S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Directions for Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 73), 1–48. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Bremmer Jr., R. H.
2017Old English būtan / Old Frisian būta: from adverb to conjunction Another Anglo-Frisian Parallel? Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 77(3–4). 601–615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buma, W. J.
(ed.) 1949Die Brokmer rechtshandschriften. The Hague: Nijhof. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buma, W. J. & W. Ebel
(eds.) 1963Altfriesische rechtsquellen. Göttingen: Musterschmidt.Google Scholar
(eds.) 1965Das Brokmer recht. Altfriesische rechtsquellen 2. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Carlton, C. M.
1970Descriptive syntax of the Old English charters. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cichosz, A.
2010The influence of text type on word order of Old Germanic languages. A corpus-based contrastive study of Old English and Old High German. Studies in English Medieval Language and Literature. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
[ p. 39 ]
Clemoes, P.
(ed.) 1997Ælfric’s Catholic homilies. The first series text. Early English Text Society, Supplementary Series 17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. & D. Davy
1969Investigating English style. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Daube, D.
1956Forms of Roman legislation. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Erdmann, O.
(ed.) 1973Otfrids Evangelienbuch. 6th edition by L. Wolff. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Fischer, O. et al.
2000The syntax of early English. Cambridge Syntax Guides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, S., T. Kupisch & E. Rinke
2016Definiteness effects: Bilingual, typological and diachronic variation. In S. Fischer, T. Kupisch & E. Rinke (eds.), Definiteness effects: bilingual, typological and diachronic variation, 1–11. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Godden, M.
(ed.) 1979Ælfric’s Catholic homilies. The second series text. Early English Text Society, Supplementary Series 5. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, C. J.
2014Two aspects of nominal style in the Seventeen Statutes and Twenty-four Landlaws . In R. H. Bremmer Jr., S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Directions for Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 73), 119–144. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Haan, G. de
2001Syntax of Old Frisian. In H. H. Munske (ed.), Handbuch des Friesischen/Handbook of Frisian studies, 626–36. Tübingen: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haan, G. de & F. Weerman
1986Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian. In H. Haider & M. Prinzhorn (eds.), Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages. Publications in Language Sciences 21, 77–110. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. & H. van Riemsdijk
1988Verb projection raising, scope, and the typology of rules affecting verbs. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3). 417–466.Google Scholar
Harris, A. C. & L. Campbell
1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R.
1990Chapters on legal English: Aspects past and present of the language of law. Annales Academiae scientiarum Fennicae, Series B 251. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, R. & S. Petrova
2010From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120(2). 315–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ibbetson, D.
2003How the Romans did for us: Ancient roots of the tort of negligence. UNSW Law Journal 26. 474–514.Google Scholar
Kemenade, A. van
1987Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of English. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997V2 and embedded topicalization in Old and Middle English. In A. van Kemenade & N. Vincent (eds.), Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 326–352. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P.
1995Indo-European origins of Germanic syntax. In A. Battye & I. Roberts (eds.), Clause structure and language change. Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, 140–169. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koopman, W.
1997Another look at clitics in Old English. Transactions of the Philological Society 95(1). 73–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liebermann, F.
(ed.) 1898Die Gesetze der Angelsachsen, vol. 1: Text und Übersetzung. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.Google Scholar
[ p. 40 ]
Los, B.
2015A historical syntax of English. Edinburgh Textbooks on the English Language – Advanced. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lühr, R.
2007Bedingungssätze in altfriesischen Rechtstexten. In R. H. Bremmer Jr., S. Laker & O. Vries (eds.), Advances in Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 64), 213–238. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Masser, A.
(ed.) 1994Die lateinisch-althochdeutsche Tatianbilingue Stiftsbibliothek St. Gallen Cod. 56. In cooperation with E. de Felip-Jaud. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mather, F. J.
1893The conditional sentence in Anglo-Saxon. Munich: Dr. C. Wolf und Sohn. (Doctoral dissertation)Google Scholar
Meer, G. van der
1990On the position of the Old Frisian verbs and pronouns. In R. H. Bremmer Jr., G. van der Meer & O. Vries (eds.), Aspects of Old Frisian philology (= Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 31/32), 311–335. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Miller, T.
(ed.) 1890–1898The Old English version of Bede’s Ecclesiastical History, 4. vols. Early English Text Society os 95, 96, 110 and 111. London: Oxford University Press [repr. 1959–63].Google Scholar
Mitchell, B.
1985Old English syntax, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrova, S.
2006A discourse-based approach to verb placement in early West-Germanic. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS) 5, 153–185.Google Scholar
2011Modelling word order variation in discourse: On the pragmatic properties of VS order in Old High German. Indo-European syntax and pragmatics: Contrastive approaches. Oslo Studies in Language 3(3). 209–228.Google Scholar
Ringe, D. & A. Taylor
2014A linguistic history of English, vol. II: The development of Old English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schwyter, J. R.
1996Old English legal language: The lexical field of theft. NOWELE Supplement Series 15. Odense: Odense University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sedgefield, W. J.
(ed.) 1899King Alfred’s Old English version of Boethius De consolatione philosophiae. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Seebold, E.
1975Der Aufbau des altfriesischen Brokmerbriefs. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 97, 365–395.Google Scholar
Sievers, E.
(ed.) 1935Heliand. Halle (Saale): Waisenhaus.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. & S. Pintzuk
2015Verb order, object position, and information status in Old English. In T. Biberauer & G. Walkden (eds.), Syntax over time: Lexical, morphological, and information-structural interactions. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics, 318–335. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, S.
1995Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vries, O.
2007Asega, is het dingtijd? De hoogtpunten van de Oudfriese. Leeuwarden-Utrecht: Sterk.Google Scholar
Walkden, G.
2014Syntactic reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 12. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, S.
2005Verb clusters, verb raising, and restructuring. In M. Everaert, H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Blackwell companion to syntax, vol. 5, 227–341. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
[ p. 41 ]