Verbal morphology in the Old English gloss to the Durham Collectar
This article examines the verbal morphology of the Old English interlinear gloss to the Durham Collectar,
attributed by almost universal consensus to Aldred of Chester-le-Street, whose earlier gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels has
recently been the object of scholarly attention (Cole 2014; Fernández Cuesta & Pons-Sanz 2016, Gameson et al. 2017). This article analyses
-s/-th variation in the present indicative and imperative forms in relation to their syntactic context,
in particular subject type and subject-verb adjacency, in order to assess whether the Northern Subject Rule detected by Cole (2014) in Lindisfarne was also operative in Aldred’s later gloss. By means of a
quantitative analysis, we find that the first constraint does not significantly affect -s/-ð
variation in the gloss and that there is insufficient context for the second. Additionally, it is argued that adjacency is a
problematic variable in this text-type. We also demonstrate that there is a higher percentage of second person singular
-st and -ð in the Collectar than in Lindisfarne and discuss the possible influence of
standard West Saxon on the later gloss.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Results
- 2.1Third-person singular present indicative
- 2.2First-person plural present indicative
- 2.3Second person plural indicative
- 2.4Third-person plural present indicative
- 2.5Second person singular present indicative
- 3.Adjacency effects
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References
Bailey, G., N. Maynor & P. Cukor-Avila
1989 Variation in subject verb concord in Early Modern English.
Language, Variation and Change 1(3). 285–300.
Barth, D. & V. Kapatsinki
2011 Evaluating logistic mixed-effects models of corpus data. In
D. Speelman,
K. Heylen &
D. Geeraerts (eds.),
Mixed effects regression models in linguistics, 99–116. Heidelberg: Springer.
Benskin, M.
2011 Present indicative plural concord in Brittonic and Early English.
Transactions of the Philological Society 1091. 158–185.
Berndt, R.
1956 Form und Funktion des Verbums im nördlichen Spätaltenglischen. Halle: Niemeyer.
Blakeley, L.
1949–1950 The Lindisfarne s/ð problem. Studia Neophilologica
221. 15–47.
Blom, A. H.
2017 Glossing the Psalms: The emergence of the written vernaculars in Western Europe from the seventh to the twelfth centuries. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Bonner, G.
1989 St Cuthbert at Chester-le-Street. In
G. Bonner,
D. Rollason &
C. Stancliffe (eds.), 387–395.
Bonner, G., D. Rollason & C. Stancliffe
(eds.) 1989 St Cuthbert, his cult and his community to AD 1200. Woodbridge: Boydell.
Brookes, S.
2016 The shape of things to come? Variation and intervention in Aldred’s gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels. In:
J. Fernández Cuesta &
S. Pons-Sanz, (eds.), 103–152.
Brown, T. J.
(ed.) 1969 The Durham Ritual: A southern English collectar of the tenth century with Northumbrian additions, Durham Cathedral Library A.IV.19.
Early English Manuscripts in Facsimile 16. Copenhagen: Rosenkilde & Bagger.
Brunner, A.
1947–1948 A note on the distribution of the variant forms of the Lindisfarne Gospels.
English and Germanic Studies 11. 32–52.
Campbell, A.
1959 Old English grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.
Cavill, P.
2016 Maxims in Aldred’s Marginalia to the Lindisfarne Gospels. In
J. Fernández Cuesta &
S. Pons-Sanz, (eds.), 79–102.
Corrêa, A.
1992 The Durham Collectar. London: Published for the Henry Bradshaw Society by the Boydell Press.
Feizmohammadpour, A.
2013 Optional subject-verb agreement in Persian. University of Florida. (Doctoral dissertation)
Fernández Cuesta, J.
2011 The Northern Subject Rule in first-person-singular contexts in Early Modern English.
Folia Linguistica Historica 321. 89–114.
Fernández Cuesta, J.
2014 The voice of the dead: Analyzing sociolinguistic variation in Early Modern English wills and testaments.
Journal of English Linguistics 42(4). 330–358.
Fernández Cuesta, J. & N. Rodríguez Ledesma
2016 A case of accusative/dative syncretism in the language of the Lindisfarne Gospels gloss? Paper presented at the International Conference of English Historical Linguistics, Essen, 22–26 Aug, 2016.
Fernández Cuesta, J. & S. Pons-Sanz
(eds.) 2016 The Old English glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fernández Cuesta, J. & C. Langmuir
In prep.
Not in the right mood: the subjunctive in the Old Northumbrian gloss to the Durham Collectar.
Fernández Cuesta, J. & N. Rodríguez Ledesma
Forthcoming.
A case of accusative/dative syncretism in the language of the Lindisfarne Gospels gloss and the Durham Collectar.
Gameson, R.
2013 From Holy Island to Durham: The contexts and meanings of the Lindisfarne Gospels. London: Third Millennium.
Gameson, R.
2017 The Lindisfarne Gospels: New perspectives (
Library of the Written Word, vol. 57/The Manuscript World, vol. 9). Leiden: Brill.
Görlach, M.
1990 Middle English: A creole? In
M. Görlach (ed.),
Studies in the History of the English Language, 65–78. Heidelberg: Winter.
Gretsch, M.
1999 The intellectual foundations of the English Benedictine Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gretsch, M.
2000 The Junius Psalter gloss: Its historical and cultural context.
Anglo-Saxon England 291. 85–121.
Higham, N. J. & M. J. Ryan
2013 The Anglo-Saxon world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hogg, R. M. & R. D. Fulk
2011 A grammar of Old English. Volume II: Morphology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Holmqvist, E.
1922 On the history of the English present inflections, particularly th and -s. Heidelberg: Winter.
Hunter-Blair, P.
1966 An introduction to Anglo-Saxon England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jolly, K. L.
2012 The community of St. Cuthbert in the late tenth century: The Chester-le-Street additions to Durham Cathedral Library A.IV.19. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
Jolly, K. L.
2016 The process of glossing and glossing as process: Scholarship and education in Durham, Cathedral Library, MS A.iv.19. In
J. Fernández Cuesta &
S. Pons-Sanz (eds.), 361–376.
Kastovsky, D. & G. Bauer
(eds.) 1988 Luick revisited. Tübingen: Narr.
Kendrick, T. D. et al.
(eds.) 1960 Evangeliorum Quattuor Codex Lindisfarnensis, Musei Britannici Codex Nero D.IV. Volume II: Commentariorum libri duo, quorum unus de texto evangeliorum Latino et codicis ornatione, alter de glossa Anglo-Saxonica. Olten/Lausanne: Graf.
Ker, N. R.
1942 Aldred the scribe.
Essays and Studies by members of the English Association 281. 7–12.
Klemola, J.
2000 The origins of the Northern Subject Rule: A case of early contact? In
H. L. C. Tristram (ed.),
The Celtic Englishes II, 329–346. Heidelberg: Winter.
Kroch, A., A. Taylor & D. Ringe
2000 The Middle English verb-second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. In
S. Herring,
P. van Reenen &
L. Schøsler (eds.),
Textual parameters in older languages, 353–391. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Larsson, K.
2005 The development of Swedish from the mid-16th century to 1800. In
O. Bandle (ed.),
The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages, Vol.21, 1270–1281. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Lass, R., M. Laing, R. Alcorn & K. Williamson
2013– A corpus of narrative etymologies from Proto-Old English to Early Middle English and accompanying corpus of changes.
Version 1.1 [
[URL]]. Edinburgh: © The University of Edinburgh.
Lemke, A.
2015 The Old English translation of Bede’s Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum in its historical and cultural context. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
Lindelöf, U.
1890 Die Sprache des Rituals von Durham. Ein Beitrag zur altenglischen Grammatik. Helsingfors: Frenckell & Son.
Lindelöf, U.
(ed.) 1927 Rituale Ecclesiae Dunelmensis. The Durham Collectar. A new and revised edition of the Latin text with the interlinear Anglo-Saxon version,
Surtees Society 140, Durham/London: Andrews⁄ Quaritch.
McColl Millar, R.
2016 The interaction of closely related linguistic varieties and the history of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Metzger, B. M.
1997 The earliest versions of the New Testament: Their origins, transmission and limitations. Oxford: Clarendon.
Miller, G.
2002 The origin and diffusion of English 3sg -s
.
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 381. 352–61.
Poussa, P.
1982 The evolution of Early Standard English: The creolization hypothesis.
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 141. 60–87.
Roberts, J.
2016 Aldred: Glossator and book historian. In
J. Fernández Cuesta &
S. Pons-Sanz (eds.), 37–60.
Robinson, F. C.
1973 Syntactical glosses in Latin manuscripts of Anglo-Saxon provenance.
Speculum 48(3). 443–475.
Rodríguez Ledesma, N.
2013 The Northern Subject Rule in first-person singular contexts in Older Scots.
Folia Linguistica Historica 341. 149–172.
Ross, A. S. C.
1960 Standard paradigms. In
Kendrick et al. (eds.),
Book II, 37–42.
Ross, A. S. C.
1968 Aldrediana XVII: Ritual supplement.
English Philological Studies 111. 1–43.
Ross, A. S. C.
1968 On some forms of the anomalous and contracted verbs in the Anglo-Saxon glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels and the Durham Ritual.
Transactions of the Philological Society, 69–105.
Ross, A. S. C.
1970 Conservatism in the Anglo-Saxon gloss to the Durham Ritual.
Notes and Queries 2151. 363–366.
Ross, A. S. C.
1971 Aldrediana XXIII: Notes on the accidence of the Durham Ritual.
Leeds Studies in English 51. 53–67.
Ross, A. S. C.
1978 A point of comparison between Aldred’s two glosses.
Notes and Queries 2231. 197–199.
Ross, A. S. C., E. G. Stanley & T. J. Brown
1960 Some observations on the gloss and the glossator. In
Kendrick et al. (eds.),
Book II, 3–33.
Rusche, P. G.
2016 The Lindisfarne Gospel glosses and the Benedictine Reform. Was Aldred trained in the Southumbrian glossing tradition? In
J. Fernández Cuesta &
S. Pons-Sanz (eds.), 61–78.
Skeat, W. W.
(ed.) 1871–1887 The Holy Gospels in Anglo-Saxon, Northumbrian, and Old Mercian Versions. 41 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [Mark (1871), Luke (1874), John (1878), Matthew (1887)].
Skeat, W. W.
(ed.) 1878 The Gospel according to Saint John in Anglo-Saxon and Northumbrian versions synoptically arranged. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spellman, D.
2011 Logistic regression: A confirmatory technique for comparisons in corpus linguistics. In
D. Glynn &
J. A. Robinson (eds.),
Corpus methods for semantics. Quantitative studies in polysemy and synonymy, 487–533. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Stanley, E. G.
1988 Karl Luick’s “Man schrieb wie man sprach” and English historical phonology. In
D. Kastovsky &
G. Bauer. (eds.), 311–334.
Stein, D.
1986 Old English Northumbrian verb inflection revisited. In
D. Kastovsky &
A. Szwedek, (eds.),
Linguistics across historical and geographical boundaries; in honour of Jacek Fisiak on the occasion of his fiftieth birthday. Volume I: Linguistic theory and historical linguistics, 637–650. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Stevenson, J.
1840 Rituale Ecclesiae Dunelmensis.
Surtees Society 10. London.
Theijssen, D.
2009 Variable selection in logistic regression: The British English dative alternation. In
T. Icard &
R. Muskens (eds.),
Interfaces: Explorations in logic, language and computation, 87–101. Berlin: Springer.
Thomason, S. G. & T. Kaufman
1988 Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Timofeeva, O.
2010 Anglo-Latin bilingualism before 1066: Prospects and limitations. In
Alaric Hall,
O. Timofeeva,
Á. Kiricsi &
B. Fox (eds.),
Interfaces between language and culture in Medieval England. A Festschrift for Matti Kilpiö, 1–36. Leiden: Brill.
Townend, M.
2002 Language and history in Viking-Age England: Linguistic relations between speakers of Old Norse and Old English. Turnhout: Brepols.
Tristram, H. L. C.
2004 Diglossia in Anglo-Saxon England, or what was spoken Old English like? Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 401. 87–110.
Trudgill, P.
1986 Dialects in contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
Trudgill, P.
2011 Sociolinguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Bergen, L.
2008 Negative constructions and OE dialects: Evidence from glosses and prose.
Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 1091. 275–312.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Fernández Cuesta, Julia
2022.
Der Geist, der stets verneint: Roger Lass’s epistemology of linguistic change.
Language & History 65:1
► pp. 39 ff.
Fernández-Cuesta, Julia & Nieves Rodríguez-Ledesma
2020.
Reduced forms in the nominal morphology of the Lindisfarne Gospel Gloss. A case of accusative/dative syncretism?.
Folia Linguistica 54:s41-s1
► pp. 37 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.