Cover not available
Article published In:
The Northumbrian Old English glosses
Edited by Elly van Gelderen
[NOWELE 72:2] 2019
► pp. 192–219

Verbal prefixes in Old Northumbrian

Evidence from the Lindisfarne glosses

| Arizona State University

In late Old English dialects, adverbial elements are frequently morphologically ambiguous (independent words, clitics, verbal prefixes, etc.), and an important facet of the proper treatment of these items is the quality of source-data in different texts. This paper examines the usage of three adverbial/prepositional elements in the Northumbrian Lindisfarne Glosses: eft ‘again, after’, ymb ‘around’, and ofer ‘over’. Skeat (1871–87), whose transcription of the original manuscript is the primary reference for research on the Glosses, frequently transcribes these items as prefixes, alongside other OE prefixes like ge-, a-, for-, and be-. However, Skeat also deviates from this pattern in many cases, leaving their proper analysis uncertain. Nevertheless, various works (e.g., Cook 1894; Bosworth 2011), have indeed taken these items to be prefixes. I follow Fernández-Cuesta (2016) in revisiting the original Lindisfarne manuscript to determine the correct treatment of these items, concluding that eft and ofer should not be analyzed as prefixes in the manuscript, while ymb should have prefix status.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Distribution of eft
    • 2.1Data
    • 2.2Word spacing of eft
    • 2.3Intervening morphemes with eft
    • 2.4Doublets with eft
    • 2.5Intermediate summary
  • 3.Distribution of ymb
    • 3.1Word-spacing of ymb
    • 3.2Intervening morphemes with ymb
    • 3.3Doublets with ymb
  • 4.Distribution of ofer
    • 4.1Word spacing of ofer
    • 4.2Intervening morphemes with ofer
    • 4.3Doublets with ofer
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.00027.kru
References
Blom, A. H.
2017 Glossing the Psalms: The emergence of the written vernaculars in Western Europe from the seventh to the twelfth centuries. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, J.
2011 An Anglo-Saxon dictionary online (T. N. Toller et al., eds.). [URL].
Cook, A. S.
1894 A glossary of the Old Northumbrian Gospels (Lindisfarne Gospels or Durham Book). Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Esquibel, J. & A. Wojtyś
2016  Æfter/ra in the Lindisfarne Gospels: On the plethora of its meanings and uses in the English gloss. Anglica 25(2). 117–138.Google Scholar
Fernández Cuesta, J.
2016 Revisiting the manuscript of the Lindisfarne Gospels. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), 257–287.Google Scholar
Fernández Cuesta, J. & S. M. Pons-Sanz
eds. The Old English gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context Berlin De Gruyter DOI logo
Hiltunen, R.
1983 The decline of the prefixes and the beginnings of the English phrasal verb. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Lutz, A.
2010 Norse influence on English in the light of general contact linguistics. In I. Hegedűs & A. Fodor (eds.), English Historical Linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), 15–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rusch, P. G.
2016 The glosses to the Lindisfarne Gospels and the Benedictine Reform. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. M. Pons-Sanz (eds.), 61–78.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W.
(ed.) 1871–87 The Four Gospels in Anglo-Saxon, Northumbrian, and Old Mercian versions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J.
2003 An historical study of English: Function, form and change. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thim, S.
2012 Phrasal verbs: The English verb – particle construction and its history. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Fernández-Cuesta, Julia & Nieves Rodríguez-Ledesma
2020. Reduced forms in the nominal morphology of the Lindisfarne Gospel Gloss. A case of accusative/dative syncretism?. Folia Linguistica 54:s41-s1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.