Article published In:
The Northumbrian Old English glosses
Edited by Elly van Gelderen
[NOWELE 72:2] 2019
► pp. 220244
References (36)
Berndt, R.
1956Form und Funktion des Verbums im nördlichen Spätaltenglischen. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Boer, R. C.
1920Oudnoorsch Handboek. Haarlem: Willink.Google Scholar
Bremmer, R. H.
2009An introduction to Old Frisian. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brook, G. & R. Leslie
(eds.) 1963Layamon: Brut. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brookes, S.
2016The shape of things to come? Variation and intervention in Aldred’s gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels. In J. Fernández Cuesta & S. Pons-Sanz (eds.), The Old English gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context, 103–150. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A.
1959Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DOE
Dictionary of Old English (DOE) texts. [URL]
Faarlund, J.
2004The syntax of Old Norse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Facsimile
2002The Lindisfarne Bible. Munich: Faksimile Verlag.Google Scholar
Filppula, M., J. Klemola & H. Paulasto
2008English and Celtic in contact. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, E.
2000A history of English reflexive pronouns. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019Introduction [this issue]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogg, R. M.
2004North Northumbrian and South Northumbrian: A geographical statement? In M. Dossena & R. Lass (eds.), Methods and data in English historical dialectology, 241–255. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Irslinger, B.
2014Intensifiers and reflexives in SAE, Insular Celtic and English. Indogermanische Forschungen 1191. 159–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018Reflexive marking in English and Welsh: The “contact hypothesis” revisited. ICEHL 30 presentation.Google Scholar
Janssen, H.
1957Historische Grammatica van het Latijn II. Den Haag: Servire.Google Scholar
Klemola, J.
2013English as a contact language in the British Isles. In D. Schreier & M. Hundt (eds.), English as a contact language, 75–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
König, E. & L. Vezzosi
2004The role of predicate meaning in the development of reflexivity. In W. Bisang et al. (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? 213–244. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lange, C.
2006Reflexivity and intensification in English. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Lea, E. M.
1894The language of the Northumbrian gloss to the Gospel of St. Mark, Anglia 161. 62–206.Google Scholar
Miller, G. D.
2012External influences on English: From its beginnings to the Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, S. & A. H. Marckwardt
1951Historical outlines of English sounds and inflections. Ann Arbor, MI: Wahr.Google Scholar
Ogura, M.
1989Verbs with the reflexive pronoun and constructions with ‘self’ in Old and Early Middle English. Cambridge: Brewer.Google Scholar
Parry, J.
1937Brut y Brenhinedd. Cambridge: The Medieval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Pons-Sanz, S.
2013The lexical effects of Anglo-Scandinavian linguistic contact on Old English. Turnhout: Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poppe, E.
2009Standard Average European and the Celticity of English intensifiers and reflexives: Some considerations and implications. English Language and Linguistics 131. 251–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quak, A.
1992Formenlehre des Altniederländischen. In R. Bremmer & A. Quak (eds), Zur Phonologie und Morphologie des Altniederländischen, 81–123. Odense: Odense University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schrijver, P.
2011Old British. In E. Ternes (ed.), Brythonic Celtic – Britannisches Keltisch: From Medieval British to Modern Breton, 1–84. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Skeat, W. W.
(ed.) 1871–87The Gospel according to St. Matthew, St. Mark, St. Luke and St. John. Reprint: Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Thurneysen, R.
1946A grammar of Old Irish. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Tristram, H. L. C.
1999How Celtic is Standard English? The Annual Celtic Lecture, St. Petersburg: Russian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Vennemann, T.
2013Concerning myself . In R. Mailhammer (ed.), Lexical and structural etymology: Beyond word histories, 121–146. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vezzosi, L.
2005The development of himself in Middle English: A ‘Celtic’ Hypothesis. In N. Ritt & H. Schendl (eds.), Rethinking Middle English: Linguistic and literary approaches, 228–43. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Visser, F.
1963An historical syntax of the English grammar, Vol I1. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by 2 other publications

Kiss, Katalin É. & Nikolett Mus
2022. The reflexive cycle. Journal of Uralic Linguistics 1:1  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Fernández-Cuesta, Julia & Nieves Rodríguez-Ledesma
2020. Reduced forms in the nominal morphology of the Lindisfarne Gospel Gloss. A case of accusative/dative syncretism?. Folia Linguistica 54:s41-s1  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.