Cover not available
Review article published In:
NOWELE Volume 53 (May 2008)
[NOWELE 53] 2008
► pp. 115–122
Review article

Mindy Macleod & Bernard Mees. Runic Amulets and Magic Objects. Woodbridge, Suffolk, UK/Rochester, NY, USA: The Boydell Press, 2006. x + 278 pp. 16 illustrations.

Published online: 1 May 2008
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.53.10ant
References (15)
Bibliography
Antonsen, Elmer H. 1975. A Concise Grammar of the Older Runic Inscriptions. (Sprachstrukturen A:31.) Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Runes and Germanic linguistics. (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 1401.) Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bugge, Sophus. 1888. ‘Zur altgermanischen Sprachgeschichte. Germanisch ug aus uw’ . Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen sprache und literatur 131:504–15.Google Scholar
Flowers, Stephen E. 2006. ‘How to do things with runes: A semiotic approach to operative communication’. In: Runes and their secrets: studies in Runology, 65–81, edited by Marie stoklund, Michael Lerche Nielsen, Bente Holmberg, and Gillian Fellows-Jensen. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang. 1966. Die Runeninschriften im älteren Futhark, 1–2. (Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Philosophisch-historische Klasse, 3. Folge, nr. 651.) Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Makaev, Ènver = Mаkаeв, Знвep. 1965. Языκ дpeвнeйшиx pyничeckиx нaд-πиceй: Лингвстичeckий и истopиko-филoлгичeckий aнaлиз. Mосквa: Издaтeльство «Hayкa».Google Scholar
Makaev, Ènver. 1996. The Language of the Oldest Runic Inscriptions: A linguistic and Historical-Philological Analysis, transl. by John Meredig in consultation with Elmer H. Antonsen, prepared for publication by Thorsten Andersson and Henrik Williams. (Kungliga vitterhets-, Historieoch Antikvitets Akademiens Handlingar, Filologisk-filosofiska serien 211.) Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International. [Transl. of Makaev 1965.]Google Scholar
Markey, Thomas L. ‘The dedicatory formula and runic tawide’ [forthcoming].
Moulton, william G. 1972. ‘The Proto-Germanic non-syllabics (consonants)’. In: Toward a Grammar of Proto-Germanic, 141–73, edited by Frans van Coetsem & Herbert L. Kufner. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, N. Å. 1984. Fra runesprog til nudansk: studier og kommenterede texter. Århus: Nordisk institut, Aarhus Universitet.Google Scholar
Noreen, Adolf. 1892. Altnordische Grammatik I: Altisländische und altnorwegische Grammatik (laut- und Formenlehre) unter Berücksichtigung des Urnordischen. 2. Auflage. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 1923. Altnordische Grammatik I: Altisländische und altnorwegische Grammatik (laut- und Formenlehre) unter Berücksichtigung des Urnordischen. 4. Auflage. Halle/Saale: Max Niemeyer.[Anhang: Diewichtigsten urnordischen inschriften, 374–393.]Google Scholar
Santesson, Lillemor. 1989. ‘En blekingsk blotinskift: En nytolkning av inledningsraderna på stentoftenstenen’. Fornvännen 841:221–9.Google Scholar
Steblin-Kamenskij, M. I. = [ Cтеблин-Kaменский, M.И. 1959. Kaкую cистeму Γлacныx выpaжaл πepвонaчaльно рyничeский aлфaвит? [What vowel system did the runic alphabet originally express?] Cкaндинaвcкий cбopник Skandinavskij sbornik [scandinavian Papers] 41:153–158.Google Scholar
Steblin-Kamenskij, M. I. 1962. ‘Noen fonologiske betraktninger over de eldre runer’. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 771:1–6.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Mees, Bernard
2013. ‘Giving’ and ‘Making’ in Early Runic Epigraphy. Transactions of the Philological Society 111:3 ► pp. 326 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.