Cover not available
Part of
Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory
Edited by Kristof Baten, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman and Mieke Van Herreweghe
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4] 2015
► pp. 1–18

Chapter 1. Processability theory

Assessment of the current state and future perspectives

ORCID logo | Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
 | Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
 | Vrije Universiteit Brussel
 | Ghent University
Published online: 11 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.4.01bat
References (71)
References
Abrahamsson, N. (2013). Developmental sequences. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 173-177). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aguado, K. (2008). Wie beeinflussbar ist die lernersprachliche Entwicklung. Fremdsprache Deutsch, 38, 53-58.Google Scholar
Andersen, R.W. (1978). An implicational model for second language research. Language Learning, 28(1), 221-282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bahns, J. (1983). On acquisitional criteria. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 21(1), 57-68.Google Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459-484. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beretta, A. (1991). Theory construction in second language acquisition. Complementarity and opposition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(3), 451-512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (1996). Not so fast: Some thoughts on theory culling, relativism, accepted findings and the heart and soul of SLA. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 63-83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnacker, U. (2006). When Swedes begin to learn German: From V2 to V2. Second Language Research, 22(4), 443-486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, M. (2010). Intransitive / inchoative structures in L2 Spanish. In C. Borgonovo, M. Español-Echevarría, & P. Prévost (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 12th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 160-170). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Charters, H., Dao, L., & Jansen, L. (2011). Reassessing the applicability of Processability Theory: The case of nominal plural. Second Language Research, 27(4), 509-533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism-Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7-21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, B. (2002). Focussing strategies in second language development: A classroom-base study of Italian L2 primary school. In B. Di Biase (Ed.), Developing a second language: Acquisition, processing and pedagogy Arabic, Chinese, English, Italian, Japanese, Swedish (pp. 95-120). Melbourne: Language Australia.Google Scholar
. (2008). Focus-on-Form and development in L2 learning. In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 197-219). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Dulay, H.C., & Burt, M.K. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24(1), 37-53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyson, B. (1996). The debate on form-focused instruction: A teacher's perspective. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 274-302.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (1988). The effects of linguistic environment on the second language-acquisition of grammatical rules. Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 257-274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1993). The structural syllabus and 2nd language-acquisition. Tesol Quarterly, 27(1), 91-113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285-300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A., & Lund, K. (2001). Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 389-416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregg, K. (1993). Taking explanations seriously; Or, let a couple of flowers bloom. Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 276-294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000). A theory for every occasion: Postmodernism and SLA. Second Language Research, 16(4), 34-59.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregg, K., Long, M., Jordan, G., & Beretta, A. (1997). Rationality and its discontents in SLA. Applied Linguistics, 18(4), 538-558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G. (2013). Emergence criterion. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 203-204). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Håkansson, G., Pienemann, M., & Sayehli, S. (2002). Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing. Second Language Research, 18(3), 250-273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (1987). Onset and development of grammatical features: Two approaches to acquisition orders. Paper presented at Interlanguage Conference. LaTrobe University, Melbourne.
Jansen, L. (2008). Acquisition of German word order in tutored learners: A cross-sectional study in a wider theoretical context. Language Learning, 58(1), 185-231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jordan, G. (2004). Theory construction in second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keßler, J.-U. (2007). Assessing EFL-development online: A feasability study of Rapid Profile. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 119-143). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
. (2008a). Communicative tasks and second language profiling: Linguistic and pedagogical implications. In J. Eckerth & S. Siepmann (Eds.), Research on task-based language learning and teaching: Theoretical, methodological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 291-310). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. (2008b). Processability aspects of second language development and second language learning. In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 67-86). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Keßler, J.-U., Liebner, M., & Mansouri, F. (2011). Teaching. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory. An introductory textbook. (pp. 149-156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S. (1984). Response to Ioup. TESOL Quarterly, 18(2), 350-352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J.P. (1996). SLA theory building: ''Letting all the flowers bloom!''. Language Learning, 46(4), 713-749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P.M. (1985). Great expectations - 2nd-language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 173-189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1998). The importance of timing in Focus on Form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 177-196). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. (2000). Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21, 431-462. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (1990). The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. Tesol Quarterly, 24(4), 649-666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1993). Assessment strategies for SLA theories. Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 225-249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., Pienemann, M., & Thornton, I. (1991). RapidPROFILE: A second language screening procedure. Language and Language Education: Working Papers of the National Languages Institute of Australia, 1, 61-82.Google Scholar
Mansouri, F., & Duffy, L. (2005). The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 81-99.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J.M. (2013). Development in second language acquisition. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (pp. 165-173). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Meisel, J.M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3(2), 109-135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, F., Hooper, J., & Mitchell, R. (1998). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. Language Learning, 48(3), 323-364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myles, F., Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J. (1999). Interrogative chunks in French L2: A basis for creative construction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), 49-80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2007). Second language learning explained? SLA across nine contemporary theories. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 221-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pallotti, G. (2007). An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 361-382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590-601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. (1985). Learnability and syllabus construction. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language development (pp. 23-76). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
. (1988). Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. AILA Review, 5, 40-72.Google Scholar
. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Discussing PT. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 61-83). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2007). Processability Theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 137-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005a). Extending Processability Theory. In Pienemann (Ed.), (pp. 199-251). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Håkansson, G. (2005b). Processability, typological distance and L1 transfer. In Pienemann (Ed.), (pp. 85-115). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G. (2007). Response article: Full transfer vs. developmentally moderated transfer, a reply to Bohnacker. Second Language Research, 23(4), 485-493. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J.-U. (2007). Measuring bilingualism. In P. Auer & L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 247-275). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
. (2012). Processability Theory. In S.M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Plag, I. (2008a). Creoles as interlanguages - Inflectional morphology. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 23(1), 114-135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008b). Creoles as interlanguages - Syntactic structures. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 23(2), 307-328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Creoles as interlanguages - Word-formation. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 24(2), 339-362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sayehli, S. (2013). Developmental perspectives on transfer in third language acquisition. Lund.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, H. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40-72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheen, R. (2002). A response to Lightbown's (2000) 'Anniversary article: Classroom SLA research and second language teaching'. Applied Linguistics, 23(4), 519-528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P.M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83(1), 1-22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. (2005). Theories of second language acquisition: Three sides, three angles, three points. Second Language Research, 21(4), 393-414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainikka, A., & Young-Scholten, M. (1994). Direct Acces to X´-Theory. Evidence from Korean and Turkish adult learners of German. In T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (Eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (2007). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar