Article published in:Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory
Edited by Kristof Baten, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman and Mieke Van Herreweghe
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4] 2015
► pp. 71–104
Chapter 4. The Acquisition of the Ergative Case in Hindi as a Foreign Language
Using the framework of Processability Theory (PT), this chapter examines the development of the Hindi case system in the interlanguage of Dutch-speaking foreign language learners. A number of studies have already adopted the PT framework to describe, predict and explain the development of case marking systems in different languages (e.g., German, Russian and Serbian). These studies demonstrated that PT was a suitable framework for predicting and explaining case development. Because German, Russian and Serbian are accusative languages, the question arises whether PT as a conceptual framework is also applicable to the foreign language acquisition of a language with ergative features such as Hindi. The present chapter therefore addresses case development in L2 Hindi, thereby testing the claim that PT possesses universal applicability. Spontaneous oral production data were collected from 11 foreign language learners of Hindi. In accordance with PT, the study results indicate that three stages of development occur; in particular, learners begin with no feature unification, transition through direct mapping, and eventually attain feature unification.
Published online: 11 December 2015
Cited by 5 other publications
Bhatia, Archna & Silvina Montrul
Bhatia, Archna & Silvina Montrul
Montrul, Silvina, Archna Bhatia, Rakesh Bhatt & Vandana Puri
Ponnet, Aaricia, Kristof Baten & Saartje Verbeke
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Aksu-Koç, A. & Slobin, D.
Artoni, D. & Magnani M.
(2013) LFG contributions in second language acquisition research: The development of case in L2 Russian. . In M. Butt & T. Holloway King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG13 Conference (pp. 69-89). CSLI Publications.
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., Kumar Choudhary, K., Witzlack-Makarevich, A., & Bickel, B.
Butt, M. & King, T.H.
Charters, H., Dao, L., & Jansen, L.
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiß, S., & Vainikka, A.
Di Biase, B. & Kawaguchi, S.
Dulay, H.C. & Burt, M.K.
Eisenbeiß, S., Bartke, S., & Clahsen, H.
Eisenbeiß, S., Narasimhan, B., & Voeĭkova, M.
Ezeizabarrena, M.J., & Larrañaga, M.P.
Gagarina, N., & Voeĭkova, M.
Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A., & Lund, K.
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C.
Hook, P.E., & Koul, O.N.
Kaplan, R.M., & Bresnan, J.
Ketrez, F.N., & Aksu-Koç, A.
Lakshmanan, U., & Ozeki, M.
(1996) The case of the missing particle: Objective case assignment and scrambling in the early grammar of Japanese. In A. Stringfellow, D. Cahana-Amitay, E. Hughes, & A. Zukowsk (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Boston Conference on Language Development (pp. 431-442). Somerville, Ma: Cascadilla Press.
Mansouri, F., & Duffy, L.
Meerholz-Härle, B., & Tschirner, E.
Meisel, J.M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., & Bhatia, A.
Narasimhan, B., Budwig, N., & Murty, L.
Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B.
Pandharipande, R., & Kachru, Y.
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G.
Van Valin, R.