Article published in:
Theoretical and Methodological Developments in Processability Theory
Edited by Kristof Baten, Aafke Buyl, Katja Lochtman and Mieke Van Herreweghe
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4] 2015
► pp. 169174
References

References

Bowden, H.W, Steinhauer, K. Sanz, C., & Ullman, M.T.
(2013) Native-like processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2492-2511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, O., & Wei, L.
(2013) Translanguaging. Language, bilingualism and education. Houndmills: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C.N.
(2008) Processing strategies and the comprehension of sentence-level input by L2 learners of German. System, 36, 388-406. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myles, F., Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J.
(1999) Interrogative chunks in French L2. A basis for creative construction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 49–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Håkansson, G.
(2005) Processing constraints on L1 transfer. In J.F. Kroll & A.M.B. De Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.128-153). Berlin: De GruyterGoogle Scholar
Tanner, D., McLaughlin, J., Herschensohn, J., & Osterhout, L.
(2013) Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16(2), 367-382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tokowicz, N., & Warren, T.
(2010) Beginning adult L2 learners’ sensitivity to morphosyntactic violations: A self-paced reading study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychcology, 22(7), 1092-1107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M.
(2003) Constructing a language: A Usage-based Theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar