Article published in:
Developing, Modelling and Assessing Second Languages
Edited by Jörg-U. Keßler, Anke Lenzing and Mathias Liebner
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 5] 2016
► pp. 7998
Aguado, K
(2002) Formelhafte Sequenzen und ihre Funktionen für den L2-Erwerb. Zeitschrift für angewandte Linguistik, 37, 27-49.Google Scholar
Bardel, C., & Falk, Y
(2007) The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bohnacker, Ute
(2006) When Swedes begin to learn German: From V2 to V2. Second Language Research, 22, 1-44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N
(1986) Barriers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Bot, K
(1992) A bilingual processing model: Levelt’s ‘speaking’ model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13: 1-24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grotjahn, R
(Ed.) (1992) Der C-Test. Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendungen. Bochum: AKS-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hakansson, G., Pienemann, M., & Sayehli, S
(2002) Transfer and typological proximity in the context of second language processing. Second Language Research, 18(3), 250-273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W
(1989) Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M
(1981) On determining developmental sequences in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3(2), 109-135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J.-U
(2007) Measuring bilingualism. In P. Auer & L. Wei (Eds.), Handbook of applied linguistics. Multilinguism. Vol. 5. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Unanalysierte Einheiten und Sprachverarbeitung im Zweitsprachenerwerb. Zeitschrift für angewandte Linguistik, 37, 3-26.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J.-U
(2007) Measuring bilingualism. In Auer & Wei (Eds.), pp. 247-275.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., DiBiase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Håkansson, G
(2005) Processability, typological distance and L1 transfer. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processablity Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G
(2007) Full Transfer vs. Developmentally Moderated Transfer. Second Language Research, 23(4), 485-494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Eibensteiner, Lukas
2022. L3 acquisition of aspect: the influence of structural similarity, analytic L2 and general L3 proficiency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 Crossref logo
Rothman, Jason, Jorge González Alonso & Eloi Puig-Mayenco
2019.  In Third Language Acquisition and Linguistic Transfer, Crossref logo
Saturno, Jacopo
2022. Production of inflectional morphology in intercomprehension-based language teaching: the case of Slavic languages. International Journal of Multilingualism 19:3  pp. 383 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 november 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.