Chapter published in:
Teachability and Learnability across Languages
Edited by Ragnar Arntzen, Gisela Håkansson, Arnstein Hjelde and Jörg-U. Keßler
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 6] 2019
► pp. 2749
References

References

Anderson, S. R.
2008The English “group-genitive” is a special clitic. English Linguistics 25(1): 1–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anisfeld, M. & Tucker, G. R.
1967English pluralization rules of six-year-old children. Child Development 38: 1201–2017Google Scholar
Benson, P.
2011Language learning and teaching beyond the classroom: An introduction to the field. In Beyond the Language Classroom, P. Benson & H. Reinders (eds), 7–16. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J.
2001Lexical-functional Syntax. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bettoni, C. & Di Biase, B.
(eds) 2015Grammatical Development in Second Language: Exploring the Boundaries of Processability Theory [Eurosla Monograph Series 3]. Paris: Eurosla.Google Scholar
Buyl, A., & Housen, A.
2015Developmental stages in receptive grammar acquisition: A Processability Theory account. Second Language Research 31(4): 523–550.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. E.
2001Input and Evidence: The Raw Material of Second Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Language, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Crystal, D.
2003English as a Global Language, 2nd edn, Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A.
2001Listening to a second language through the ears of a first. Interpreting 5: 1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Native Listening. Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Danish Ministry of Education
2004Fælles Mål for Engelsk 2 (Curriculum for English).Google Scholar
Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S. & Yamaguchi, Y.
2015The development of English as a second language. In Bettoni & Di Biase (eds), 85–116.Google Scholar
Dufour, R., & Kroll, J. F.
1995Matching words to concepts in two languages: A test of the concept mediation model of bilingual representation. Memory and Cognition 23: 166–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L., Whetton, C. & Burley, J.
1997The British Picture Vocabulary Scale II. Windsor: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Dyson, B.
2009Processability Theory and the role of morphology in ESL development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research 25: 355–376.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, B. & Håkansson, G.
2017Understanding Second Language Processing. With a Focus on Processability Theory [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A.
1993Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language Learning 43: 559–617.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A., Ruiz-Tada, E. & Costa, A.
2015How do you know I was about to say “book”? Anticipation processes affect speech processing and lexical recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30: 768–780.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M.
1997Input, Interaction, and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P.
2012Digital games and libraries. Knowledge Quest 41: 60–64.Google Scholar
Håkansson, G., Pienemann, M. & Sayehli, S.
2002Transfer and typological proximity in the context of L2 processing. Second Language Research 18(3): 250–273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Schoonjans, E., Janssens, S., Welcomme, A., Schoonheere, E. & Pierrard, M.
2011Conceptualizing and measuring the impact of contextual factors in instructed SLA – The role of language prominence. IRAL 49: 83–112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R. A.
2013A cognitive analysis of John’s hat. In Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 199], K. Börjars, D. Denison & A. Scott (eds), 149–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaatinen, R. & Saarivirta, T.
2014The evolution of English language teaching during societal transition in Finland – A mutual relationship or a distinctive process? Australian Journal of Teacher Education 39(11): 29–44.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kersten, K., Piske, T., Rohde, A., Steinlen, A. K., Weitz, M., Kurth, S.
2010ELIAS Grammar Test. Universität Magdeburg: ELIAS. www​.elias​.bilikita​.org
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M.
2003Possessive noun phrases in the languages of Europe. In Noun phrase Structures in the Languages of Europe, F. Plank (ed.), 621–722. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D.
1985The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kuppens, A. H.
2010Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, Media and Technology 35(1): 65–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuure, L.
2011Places for learning: Technology-mediated language learning practices beyond the classroom. In Beyond the Language Classroom, P. Benson & H. Reinders (eds), 35–46. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Yanez, M. C.
2003Talking yourself into Spanish: Private speech and second language learning. Hispania 86: 97–109.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laufer, B. & Nation, P.
1999A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing 16(1): 33–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lefever, S.
2010English skills of young learners in Iceland. “I started talking English when I was 4 years old. It just bang… just fall into me”. Rá∂stefnurit Netlu – Menntakvika Háskóla Islands, 1–17.Google Scholar
Lindgren, E. & Munoz, C.
2013The influence of exposure, parents, and linguistic distance on young European learners’ foreign language comprehension. International Journal of Multilingualism 10(1): 105–129.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M.
1996The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (eds), 413–468. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lundberg, G.
2007Developing teachers of young learners: In-service for educational change and improvement. In Teaching Modern Languages to Young Learners, Teachers, Curricula and Materials, M. Nikolov, J. M. Djigunovic, G. Lundberg, T. Flanagan & M. Mattheoudakis (eds), 21–34. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
Marian, V., & Spivey, M.
2003Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6: 97–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J.-R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A. & Costa, A.
2013Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language 69: 574–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nation, P.
2001Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Otwinowska-Kasztelanic, A.
2011Awareness and affordances: Multilinguals versus bilinguals and their perception of cognates. In New Trends in Crosslinguistic Influence and Multilingualism Research, G. De Angelis & J. M. Dewaele (eds), 1–18. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Palmberg, R.
1985How much English vocabulary do Swedish-speaking primary-school pupils know before starting to learn English at school? In Foreign Language Learning and Bilingualism, H. Ringbom (ed.), 2–10. Publications of the Research Institute of ÅBO Akademi Foundation NR 105.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M.
1998Language Processing and Language Development: Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) 2005Cross-linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 30]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010A cognitive view of language acquisition: Processability Theory and beyond. In Conceptualising ‘Learning’ in Applied Linguistics, P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh & C. Jenks (eds), 69–88. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015An outline of Processability Theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning 65: 123–151.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Håkansson, G.
1999A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: A processability account. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 383–420.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Johnston, M.
1987Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In Applying Second Language Acquisition Research, D. Nunan (ed.), 45–141. Adelaide: National Curriculum Research Centre, Adult Migrant Education Program.Google Scholar
Piirainen-Marsch, A. & Tainio, L.
2009Other-repetition as a resource for participation in the activity of playing a video game. The Modern Language Journal 93: 153–169.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T. & Young-Scholten, M.
2008Input Matters in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C.
2014The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal: 1–18.Google Scholar
Rohde, A.
2010Receptive L2 lexical knowledge in bilingual preschool children. In Bilingual Preschools, Vol. I: Learning and Development, K. Kersten, A. Rohde, C. Schelletter & A. Steinlen (eds), 45–68. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Rubin, J.
1975What the ‘‘good language learner’’ can teach us. TESOL Quarterly 9: 41–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Savijärvi, M. & Seppänen, E. L.
2010Recycling the teacher’s words. In Proceedings from the Second International Interdisciplinary Conference on Perspectives and Limits of Dialogism in Mikhail Bakhtin, K. Junefelt & P. Nordin (eds), 216–225. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A.
1996L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12: 40–72.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Söderström, P., Horne, M., Frid, J. & Roll, M.
2016Pre-Activation Negativity (PrAN) in brain potentials to unfolding words. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10/512.Google Scholar
Sundqvist, P.
2009Extramural English Matters. Out-of-school English and its Impact on Swedish Ninth Graders’ Oral Proficiency and Vocabulary. PhD dissertation, Karlstad University.Google Scholar
Sundqvist, P. & Sylvén, L. K.
2014aHow Swedish children learn English through gaming. The conversation. theconversation​.com​/how​-swedish​-children​-learn​-english​-through​-gaming​-31073
2014bLanguage-related computer use: Focus on young L2 English learners in Sweden. ReCALL 26(1): 3–20.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steinlen, A. K., Håkansson, G., Housen, A. & Schelletter, C.
2010Receptive L2 grammar knowledge development in bilingual preschools. In Bilingual Preschools, Vol. I: Learning and Development, K. Kersten, A. Rohde, C. Schelletter & A. Steinlen (eds), 69–100. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Swain, M.
1985Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Input in Second Language Acquisition, S. Gass & D. Madden (eds), 234–254. Boston MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swedish Media Council
Sylvén, L. K.
2013CLIL in Sweden – why does it not work? A metaperspective on CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16(3): 301–320.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sylvén, L. K. & Ohlander, S.
2014The CLISS project: Receptive vocabulary in CLIL versus non-CLIL groups. Moderna språk 2014(2): 80–114.Google Scholar
Sylvén, L. K. & Sundqvist, P.
2012Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. ReCALL 24: 302–321.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turgut, Y. & Pelin Irgin, P.
2009Young learners’ language learning via computer games. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences 1: 760–764.CrossrefGoogle Scholar