Cover not available
Part of
Teachability and Learnability across Languages
Edited by Ragnar Arntzen, Gisela Håkansson, Arnstein Hjelde and Jörg-U. Keßler
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 6] 2019
► pp. 97–118

Chapter 5
The elicitation of oral language production data

An exploration of the Elicited Imitation Task

ORCID logo | Ghent University
To determine developmental stages, research based on the framework of Processability Theory (PT) commonly examines data from naturally occurring speech. This chapter will investigate whether experimentally elicited data can also be used as a valid basis for determining developmental stages. It reports on a study that tested predictions derived from PT regarding developmental stages of case markers in L2 German. The results show that data obtained from an Elicited Imitation Task (EIT) yields the same developmental order, as well as variation, that has previously been found in naturally occurring data. The study therefore suggests that the EIT affords a valid method to examine developmental stages. Positive and negative aspects of the elicited imitation task will be considered.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The EIT: Procedure
  • 3.Methodological challenge: Topicalization and functional case use in L2 German
  • 4.The study
    • Participants
    • Data elicitation task
    • Results
  • 5.Pros and cons of the EIT
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 6 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/palart.6.05bat
References (51)
References
Arnett, C. & Jernigan, H. 2014. A cognitive grammar account of case for L2 students of German. German as a Foreign Language 15: 68–93.Google Scholar
Artoni, D. & Magnani, M. 2013. LFG contributions in second language acquisition research: The development of case in L2 Russian. In Proceedings of the LFG13 Conference, M. Butt & T. Holloway King (eds), 69–89. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S. & Papagno, C. 1998. The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review 105: 158–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baten, K. 2013. The Acquisition of the German Case System by Foreign Language Learners [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Methodologische Herausforderungen der empirischen fremdsprachenerwerbs-forschung am Beispiel des Kasuserwerbs: Die „Elicited Imitation Task“. Zeitschrift für Fremdsprachenforschung 26: 161–181.Google Scholar
Baten, K. & Lochtman, K. 2014. Das deutsche Kasussystem im Fremdsprachenerwerb: Ein Forschungsüberblick. Muttersprache 124: 1–25.Google Scholar
Bittner, D. 2006. Case before gender in the acquisition of German. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 40: 115–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. & Chaudron, C. 1994. Elicited imitation as a measure of second-language competence. In Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition, E. Tarone, S. Gass & A. Cohen (eds), 245–261. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bowles, M. 2011. Measuring implicit and explicit linguistic knowledge: What can heritage language learners contribute? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33: 247–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C., Ngyuen, H. & Prior, M. 2005. Manual for the Vietnamese elicited imitation test. National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai‘i, 1–33.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiß, S. & Vainikka, A. 1994. The seeds of structure: A syntactic analysis of the acquisition of case marking. In Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8], T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (eds), 85–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Czepluch, H. 1996. Case morphology and case system in L1 acquisition: A pilot study of a German child. In Theoretical Linguistics and Grammatical Description. Papers in Honour of Hans-Heinrich Lieb [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 138], R. Sackmann & M. Budde (eds), 89–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diehl, E., Christen, H., Leuenberger, S., Pelvat, I. & Studer, T. 2000. Grammatikunterricht: Alles für der Katz? Untersuchungen zum Zweitsprachenerwerb Deutsch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Eisenbeiß, S., Bartke, S. & Clahsen, H. 2005. Structural and lexical case in child German: Evidence from language-impaired and typically developing children. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics 13: 3–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. 2005. Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning: Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18: 4–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R. 2006. Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics 27: 464–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, K. 2010. Kodiert das Deutsche funktional? Mythen, Fakten, Sprachvergleich und Deutsch als Fremdsprache. In Valenz und Deutsch als Fremdsprache, K. Fischer, E. Fobbe, S. Schierholz (eds), 13–40. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Glaboniat, M., Müller, M., Rusch, P. & Wertenschlag, L. 2005. Profile Deutsch: Gemeinsamer europäischer Referenzrahmen: Lernzielbestimmungen; Kannbeschreibungen; Kommunikative Mittel; Niveau A1-A2. B1-B2. C1-C2. Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Graham, C. R., Lonsdale, D., Kennington, C., Johnson, A. & McGhee, J. 2008. Elicited imitation as an oral proficiency measure with asr scoring. Proceedings of LREC 2008, Marrakech (Morocco). 1604–1610.Google Scholar
Håkansson, G. 2012. The emergence criterion. In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition, P. Robinson (ed.), 213–214. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H., Alderson, J. C. & Schoonen, R. 2010. Developmental stages in second-language acquisition and levels of second-language proficiency: Are there links between them? In Communicative Proficiency and Linguistic Development: Intersections between SLA and Language Testing Research [Eurosla Monographs Series 1], I. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (eds), 11–20. Paris: Eurosla.Google Scholar
Jessop, L., Suzuki, W., & Tomita, Y. 2007. Elicited imitation in second language acquisition research. Canadian Modern Language Review 64: 215–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, T. I. 1996. Elicited limitation tasks in L2 acquisition research: Lessons from native speakers. Ms, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Keatinge, D. & Keßler, J.-U. 2009. The acquisition of the passive voice in L2-English: Perception and production. In Research in Second Language Acquisition: Empirical Evidence across Languages, J.-U. Keßler & D. Keatinge (eds), 67–92. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Keßler, J.-U. 2006. Englischerwerb im Anfangsunterricht diagnostizieren. Linguistische Profilanalysen und der Übergang von der Primar- in die Sekundarstufe I [Giessener Beiträge zur Fremdsprachendidaktik]. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2007. Assessing EFL-development online: A feasibility study of Rapid Profile. In Second Language Acquisition Research. Theory-construction and Testing, F. Mansouri (ed.), 119–143. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Keßler, J.-U. & Schwab, G. 2015. PT meets CA: Second language research at the crossroads. In Theoretical Developments in Processability Theory [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 4], K. Baten, A. Buyl, K. Lochtman & M. Van Herreweghe (eds), 175–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loebell, H. & Bock, K. 2003. Structural priming across languages. Linguistics 41: 791–824. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marx, N. 2014. Kasuszuweisung und Kasuslehre bei Schülern mit Migrationshintergrund: Eine differenzierte Betrachtung. In Zweitspracherwerb im Jugendalter, B. Ahrenholz & P. Grommes (eds), 99–124. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
McDade, H., Simpson, M. & Lamb, D. 1982. The use of elicited imitation as a measure of expressive grammar: A question of validity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 47: 19–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T. & McLeod, B. 1983. Second language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning 33: 135–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Motsch, H.-J. & Riehemann, S. 2008. Grammatische Störungen mehrsprachiger Schüler. Interventionsstudie zum Therapieziel Kasus. Die Sprachheilarbeit 53: 15–25.Google Scholar
Munnich, E., Flynn, S. & Martohardjono, G. 1994. Elicited imitation and grammaticality judgment tasks; what they measure and how they relate to each other. In Research Methodology in Second Language Acquisition, E. Tarone, S. Gass & A. Cohen (eds), 227–243. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pallotti, G. 2007. An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics 28: 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1998. Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M. & Mackey, A. 1993. An empirical study of children’s ESL development and Rapid Profile. In ESL Development. Language and Literacy in Schools, Vol. 2, P. McKay (ed.), 115–259. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia and National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. 1967. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception and Psychophysics 2: 437–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheepers, C. & Corley, M. 2000. Syntactic priming in German sentence production. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, L. Gleitman & A. Joshi (eds), 435–440. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schmitz, K. 2006. Indirect objects and dative case in monolingual German and bilingual German/romance language acquisition. In Datives and Other Cases: Between Argument Structure and Event Structure [Studies in Language Companion Series 75], D. Hole, A. Meinunger & W. Abraham (eds), 239–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., Shiu, J. L. J. & Tomita, Y. 2015. Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation studies. Language Learning 65: 723–751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szagun, G. 2004. Learning by ear: On the acquisition of case and gender marking by German- speaking children with normal hearing and with cochlear implants. Journal of Child Language 31: 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thielmann, W. 2007. Fallstudie: Kasus in Sprachtheorie und Sprachvermittlung. Zielsprache Deutsch 34: 11–34.Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., McManus, K., Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. 2013. “Repeat as much as you can”: Elicited imitation as a measure of global proficiency in L2 French. In Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA, P. Leclercq, H. Hilton & A. Edmonds (eds), 143–166. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Tomita, Y., Suzuki, W. & Jessop, L. 2009. Elicited imitation: Toward valid procedures to measure implicit second language grammatical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly 43, 345–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlin, R. S. 1995. Focal attention, voice, and word order: An experimental, cross-linguistic study. In Word Order in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 30], P. Downing & M. Noonan (eds), 517–554. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B. 2004. Input processing in second language acquisition. In Processing Instruction. Theory, Research, and Commentary, B. VanPatten (ed.), 5–31. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Vinther, T. 2002. Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12: 54–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, S.-L. & Ortega, L. 2013. Measuring global oral proficiency in SLA research: A new elicited imitation test of L2 Chinese. Foreign Language Annals 46: 680–704. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winkler, S. 2011. Sprachstandsermittlung und Lernfortschrittstest mal anders. Die “Elicited Imitation Task” als ein Fenster zur lernersprachlichen Grammatik. Info DaF 5: 225–250.Google Scholar
Yan, X., Maeda, Y., Lv, J. & Ginther, A. 2016. Elicited imitation as a measure of second language proficiency: A narrative review and meta-analysis. Language Testing 33: 497–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Baten, Kristof & Aaricia Ponnet
2023. Chapter 4. Extending PT to split ergative marking and differential object marking. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9], ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.