Part of
Teachability and Learnability across Languages
Edited by Ragnar Arntzen, Gisela Håkansson, Arnstein Hjelde and Jörg-U. Keßler
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 6] 2019
► pp. 119136
Artoni, D. & Magnani, M.
2015Acquiring case marking in Russian as a second language: An exploratory study on subject and object. In Grammatical Development in Second Languages: Exploring the Boundaries of Processability Theory [Eurosla Monograph Series 3], C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (eds), 177–193. Paris: Eurosla.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A.
2003Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders 36: 189–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baten, K.
2011Processability Theory and German case acquisition. Language Learning 61(2): 455–505. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013The Acquisition of the German Case System by Foreign Language Learners. [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugman, H. & Russell, A.
2004Annotating multimedia/multi-modal resources with ELAN. In Proceedings of LREC 2004, Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, M. Lino, M. Xavier, F. Ferreira, R. Costa & R. Silva (eds), 2065–2068. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Di Biase, B. & Kawaguchi, S.
2002Exploring the typological plausibility of Processability Theory: Language development in Italian second language and Japanese second language. Second Language Research 18(3): 274–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, B., Bettoni, C. & Medojević, L.
2015The development of case: a study of Serbian in contact with Australian English. In Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory, C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (eds), 195–212. Amsterdam: The European Second Language Association.Google Scholar
Dimroth, C., Rast, R., Starren, M. & Watorek, M.
Dryer, M.
2013aDetermining dominant word order. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
2013bOrder of subject, object and verb. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]
Ellis, R.
2005Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27(2): 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erlam, R.
2006Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics 27(3): 464–491. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, W. & Perdue, C.
1997The basic variety (or: Couldn’t natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research 13(4): 301–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Zhang, X.
2015Response to Pienemann’s critique of Zhang and Lantolf (2015). Language Learning 65(3): 752–760. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, 3e edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M.
1984Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2): 186–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., Keßler, J. & Lenzing, A.
2013Developmentally moderated transfer and the role of the L2 in L3 acquisition. In Language Acquisition and Use in Multilingual Contexts: Theory and Practice, A. Flyman Mattsson & C. Norrby (eds), 142–159. Lund: Travaux de l’Institute Linguistique de Lund.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M.
2015An Outline of Processability Theory and Its Relationship to Other Approaches to SLA: An Outline of Processability Theory. Language Learning 65(1). 123–151.Google Scholar
Saturno, J.
2015Perceptual prominence and morphological processing in initial second language acquisition. In pS-prominenceS: Prominences in linguistics. Proceedings of the international Conference, A. De Dominicis (ed.), 76–95. Viterbo: Disucom Press.Google Scholar
Siewierska, A.
1993Syntactic weight vs information structure and word order variation in Polish. Journal of Linguistics 29(2): 233–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., Shiu, J., & Tomita, Y.
2015Validating an elicited imitation task as a measure of implicit knowledge: Comparisons with other validation studies. Language Learning 65(3): 723–751. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vinther, T.
2002Elicited imitation: A brief overview. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12(1): 54–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. & Lantolf, J.
2015Natural or artificial: Is the route of L2 development teachable? Language Learning 65(1): 152–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Saturno, Jacopo
2020. Word formation in the earliest stages of L2 Polish. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11:2  pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
Saturno, Jacopo
2022. Production of inflectional morphology in intercomprehension-based language teaching: the case of Slavic languages. International Journal of Multilingualism 19:3  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Saturno, Jacopo & Marzena Watorek
2020. The emergence of functional case marking in initial varieties of Polish L2. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 11:1  pp. 32 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.