Part of
Teachability and Learnability across Languages
Edited by Ragnar Arntzen, Gisela Håkansson, Arnstein Hjelde and Jörg-U. Keßler
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 6] 2019
► pp. 205234
References
Artoni, D. & Magnani, M.
2013Contributions in second language acquisition research: The development of case in Russian L2. In Proceedings of the LFG13 conference, M. Butt & T. Holloway King (eds), 69–89. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bayram, F.
2013Acquisition of Turkish by Heritage Speakers: A Processability Approach. PhD dissertation, Newcastle University.Google Scholar
Bayram, F. & Wright, C.
2018Turkish heritage language acquisition and maintenance in Germany. In The Springer International Handbooks of Education: Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education, P. P. Trifonas & T. Aravossitas (eds), 481–502. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Bettoni, C. & Di Biase, B.
2015Processability Theory: Theoretical bases and universal schedules. In Grammatical Development in Second Languages: Exploring the Boundaries of Processability Theory [Eurosla Monograph Series 3], B. Di Biase & C. Bettoni (eds), 19–79. Paris: Eurosla. [URL]
Bresnan, J.
2001Lexical-functional Syntax. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Buttkewitz, P.
2014Revised processability stages for Turkish as a second language. Paper presented at the 14th Annual International Symposium of Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition (PALA), Paderborn University.
Buttkewitz, P. S.
2016Case acquisition in Turkish: Determining stages of processability. Ms.Google Scholar
Dede, M.
1978A Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of Nominal Compounds in Turkish. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Faarlund, J. T., Lie, S. & Vannebo, K. I.
1997Norsk Referansegrammatikk (Norwegian Reference Grammar). Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Göksel, A. & Kerslake, C.
2005Turkish. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayasi, T.
1996The dual status of possessive compounds in Modern Turkish. In Symbolae turcologicae [Swedish Research Institute in Istanbul, Transactions 6], Á. Berta, B. Brendemoen & C. Schönig (eds), 119–129. Sweden: Textgruppen i Uppsala AB.Google Scholar
Håkansson, G. & Norrby, C.
2010Environmental influence on language acquisition: Comparing second and foreign language acquisition of Swedish. Language Learning 60(3): 628–650. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, G.
2013Processability Theory: Explaining developmental sequences. In Contemporary Approaches to Second Language Acquisition [AILA Applied Linguistics Series 9], M. D. P. Garcia Mayo, M. J. Gutierrez Mangado & M. Martínez Adrián (eds), 111–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johanson, L. & Csató, É. Á.
1998Turkish. In The Turkic Languages, L. Johanson & É. Á. Csató (eds), 203–235 London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. & Bresnan, J.
1982Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, J. Bresnan (ed.), 173–281. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, J.
1997Turkish Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M.
1989Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lødrup, H.
2011Norwegian possessive pronouns: Phrases, words or suffixes? In Proceedings of the LFG11 Conference, M. Butt & T. Holloway King (eds), 339–359. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H. & Pienemann, M.
1981On determining developmental sequences in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3: 109–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. & Bickel, B.
2013Locus of marking in possessive noun phrases. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]> (13 October 2016).
Pienemann, M.
1998Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005An introduction to Processability Theory. In Cross-linguistic Aspects of Processability Theory [Studies in Bilingualism 30], M. Pienemann (ed.), 1–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Processability Theory. In Theories in Second Language Acquisition, B. VanPatten & J. Williams (eds), 137–154. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schönström, K.
2014Visual acquisition of Swedish in deaf children: An L2 processability approach. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(1): 61–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Schaaik, G.
1996Studies in Turkish Grammar [Turcologica 28]. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Kawaguchi, Satomi, Bruno Di Biase & Yumiko Yamaguchi
Keßler, Jörg‐U. & Anke Lenzing
2022. Grammar in Foreign and Second Language Classes. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.