Chapter published in:
Widening Contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues
Edited by Anke Lenzing, Howard Nicholas and Jana Roos
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 7] 2019
► pp. 18
References

References

Asudeh, A., & Toivonen, I.
(2010) Lexical-functional grammar. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (pp. 425–458). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J.
(2001) Lexical-functional syntax. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H.
(1984) The acquisition of German word order: A test case for cognitive approaches to second language acquisition. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages (pp. 219–242). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J., & Pienemann, M.
(1983) Deutsch als Zweitsprache: Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K.
(1977) Implicational patterns in interlanguage syntax variation. Language Learning 27(2), 383–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M.
(1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lenzing, A.
(2013) The development of the grammatical system in early second language acquisition. The Multiple Constraints Hypothesis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
forthc.). The production-comprehension interface in second language acquisition: An integrated encoding-decoding model. London: Bloomsbury.
Levelt, W. J. M.
(1989) Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(1981) On determining developmental sequences in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3(2), 109–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2), 186–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language processing and second language development. Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Discussing PT. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 61–83). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M.
(1987) Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre, Adult Migrant Education Program.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Lenzing, A.
(2015) Processability Theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 159–179). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., Keßler, J.-U., & Liebner, M.
(2006) Englischerwerb in der Grundschule: Untersuchungsergebnisse im Überblick. In M. Pienemann, J.-U. Keßler, & E. Roos (Eds.), Englischerwerb in der Grundschule. Ein Studien- und Arbeitsbuch (pp. 67–88). Paderborn: Schöningh.Google Scholar