Chapter published in:
Widening Contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues
Edited by Anke Lenzing, Howard Nicholas and Jana Roos
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 7] 2019
► pp. 157184
Bailey, K.
(1983) Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In H. Seliger & M. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 67–103). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Bauer, L.
(1994) Watching English change. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bell, A. & Starks, D.
(2002) Final report to the Marsden Fund: Pasifika languages of the Manukau project 2000-2002. https://​icdc​.aut​.ac​.nz​/_​_data​/assets​/pdf​_file​/0003​/76935​/marsden​_final​_report​_2002​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bettoni, C., & Di Biase, B.
(2015) Processability Theory: Theoretical bases and universal schedules. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (pp. 19–79). Paris: The European Second Language Acquisition Association.Google Scholar
Britain, D., & Sudbury, A.
(2002) There’s sheep and there’s penguins: Convergence,‘drift’ and ‘slant’ in New Zealand and Falkland Island English. In M. Jones & E. Esch (Eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra- linguistic factors (pp. 211–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H.
(1984) The acquisition of German word order. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 219–242). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Meisel, J., & Pienemann, M.
(1983) Deutsch als Zweitsprache: Der Spracherwerb ausländischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Collins, P
(2012) Singular agreement in there-existentials: An intervarietal corpus-based study. English World-Wide 33 (1), 53-68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, W. J.
(2005) Verb agreement and disagreement: A corpus investigation of concord variation in existential there + be constructions. Journal of English Linguistics 33, 35–61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., MacIntyre, P., & Henry, A.
(Eds.) (2015) Motivational dynamics in language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisikovits, E.
(1991) Variation in subject-verb agreement in inner Sydney English. In J. Cheshire (Ed.), English around the world (pp. 235–255). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feagin, C.
(1979) Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of a white community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, R., & Lambert, W.
(1972) Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gass, S.
(2010) Interactionist perspectives on second language acquisition. In R. Kaplan (Ed.), Oxford handbook of applied lingustics (2nd ed., pp. 217–231). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C.
(2007) Processability Theory applied to written and oral Swedish. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 81–94). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Hay, J., & Schreier, D.
(2004) Subject-verb agreement in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 16, 209–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horvath, B.
(1991) Finding a place in Sydney: Migrants and language change. In S. Romaine (Ed.), Language in Australia (pp. 304–317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M.
(2009) Concord with collective nouns in Australian and New Zealand English. In P. Peters, P. Collins, & A. Smith (Eds.), Comparative studies in Australian and New Zealand grammar and beyond (pp. 207–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1924) The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Klein, W., & Perdue, C.
(1992) Utterance structure: Developing grammars again. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Liu, B.
(2015) A processability approach to the L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Canberra: The Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar
Martinez Insua, A.
(2004) Existential there-constructions in Contemporary British English: A Corpus-driven analysis of their use in speech and writing. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Meechan, M., & Foley, M.
(1994) On resolving disagreement: Linguistic theory and variation – there’s bridges. Language Variation and Change 6, 63–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J.
(1987) Reference to past events and actions in the development of natural second language acquisition. In C. Pfaff (Ed.), First and second language acquisition processes (pp. 206–224). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Meisel, J, Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M.
(1981) On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3(2), 109–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H
(1984) ‘To be’ or not ‘to be’, is that really the question? Developmental sequences and the role of the copula in the acquisition of German as a second language. In R. Andersen (Ed.), Second languages: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 299–317). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
(1985) Individual differences in interlanguage use. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 8(1), 70–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H, Lightbown, P. & Spada, N.
(2001) Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning 51(4), 719–758. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, H., & Starks, D.
(2014) Language education and applied linguistics: Bridging the two fields. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M, Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S.
(2005) Extending Processability Theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory (pp. 199–251). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M.
(1987) Factors influencing the development of second language proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45–141). Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.Google Scholar
Quinn, H.
(2000) Variation in New Zealand English syntax and morphology. In A. Bell & K. Kuiper (Eds.), New Zealand English (pp. 173–197). Wellington: Victoria University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schönström, K
(2014) Visual acquisition of Swedish in deaf children: An L2 processability approach. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(1), 61–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J.
(1978) The pidginization process: A model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Shin, N
(2016) Acquiring constraints on morphosyntactic variation: Children’s Spanish subject pronoun expression. Journal of Child Language 43(4), 914–947. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starks, D., & Thompson, L.
(2009) Agreement patterns in existential constructions in the New Zealand Niuean community. World Englishes 28, 319–335. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S
(1998) Was/were variation across the generations: View from the city of York. Language Variation and Change 10, 153–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, S.
(2005) Sometimes there’s universals; sometimes there aren’t: A comparative sociolinguistic perspective on ‘default singulars’. Paper presented at World Englishes: Vernacular Universals vs. Contact Induced Change, University of Joensuu, Finland.Google Scholar
Walker, J. A.
(2007) ‘There’s bears back there’: Plural existentials and vernacular universals in (Quebec) English. English World-wide 28, 147–166. CrossrefGoogle Scholar