Chapter published in:
Widening Contexts for Processability Theory: Theories and issues
Edited by Anke Lenzing, Howard Nicholas and Jana Roos
[Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching 7] 2019
► pp. 285300
References

References

Basterrechea, M., & García Mayo, M P.
(2014) Dictogloss and the production of the English third person ‑s by CLIL and mainstream EFL learners: A comparative study. International Journal of English Studies 14(2), 77–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, C. L.
(2015) Instructing stages of Processability Theory in L2 Spanish: Next or next + 1? In K. Baten, A. Buyl, K. Lochtman, & M. Van Herreweghe (Eds.), Theoretical and methodological developments in Processability Theory (pp. 205–238). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Biase, B.
(2008) Focus-on-form and development in L2 learning. In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 197–220). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Doman, E.
(2015) Implications of the developmental stages of language acquisition for classroom teaching. In K. Baten, A. Buyl, K. Lochtman, & M. Van Herreweghe (Eds.), Theoretical and methodological developments in Processability Theory (pp. 239–262). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C., & Williams, J.
(Eds.) (1998a) Focus on form in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1998b) Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 1–11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dyson, B.
(1996) The debate on form-focused instruction: A teacher’s perspective. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 19(2), 59–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(1989) Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(3), 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Task-based language teaching and learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2009) Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 19(3), 221–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research 20(3), 405–428. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2018)  Reflections on task-based language Teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P., & Lázaro-Ibarrola, A.
(2015) Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System 54, 40–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keßler, J.-U., Liebner, M., & Mansouri, F.
(2011) Teaching. In M. Pienemann & J.-U. Keßler (Eds.), Studying Processability Theory (pp. 150–156). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keßler, J.-U., & Plesser, A.
(2011) Teaching English grammar. Standard Wissen Lehramt Englisch. Paderborn: Schöningh/UTB.Google Scholar
Lenzing, A.
(2008) Teachability and learnability: An analysis of primary school textbooks. In J.-U. Keßler (Ed.), Processability approaches to second language development and second language learning (pp. 221–241). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Lightbown, P. M.
(2003) SLA research in the classroom / SLA research for the classroom. Language Learning Journal 28(1), 4–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loewen, S.
(2005) Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27(3), 361–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H.
(1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. & Robinson, P.
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M. H.
(2000) Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. D. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy: Essays in honor of A. Ronald Walton (pp. 179–192). Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Methodological principles for language teaching. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of language teaching (pp. 373–394). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mackey, A.
(1999) Input, interaction and language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(4), 557–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mansouri, F., & Duffy, L.
(2005) The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 28(1), 81–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1984) Psychological constraints on the teachability of language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2), 186–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1989) Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics 10(1), 52–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(1998) Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(Ed.) (2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Processability Theory and teachability. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–6). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M., & Lenzing, A.
(2015) Processability Theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 159–179). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M.
(2015) An outline of Processability Theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning 65(1), 123–151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, A.
(2010) Introduction to second language acquisition. In K. Kersten, A. Rohde, C. Schelletter, & A. K. Steinlen (Eds.). Bilingual preschools, Volume II: Best practices (pp. 119–130). Trier: WVT.Google Scholar
Roos, J.
(2016) Acquisition as a gradual process: Second language development in the EFL classroom. In J.-U. Keßler, A. Lenzing, & M. Liebner (Eds.), Developing, modelling and assessing second languages (pp. 121–134). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sarandi, H.
(2017) Mixed corrective feedback and the acquisition of third person ‘-s’. The Language Learning Journal, 1–12. Crossref. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11 (2), 129–158. Google Scholar
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M.
(1999) Instruction, L1 influence and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal 83, 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? Tesol Quarterly 42(2), 181–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M.
(1993) The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. The Canadian Modern Languages Review 50(1), 33–39.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J.
(2015) Early theories in SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 17–33). London: Routledge.Google Scholar