Chapter 16
The role of grammatical development in oral assessment
Tests today are usually based on a communicative view of language, with less
focus on grammar. In this chapter, a study is presented that investigates whether there is a
difference in terms of grammatical development between a group of test-takers who passed and
a group who failed an oral language test. The study addresses theories of SLA and language
testing, i.e., Processability Theory and the model of Communicative Language Ability, the
construct of the test. Data from learners’ test performances were analysed using PT in order
to see whether there was a consistent relationship between the PT stage analysis and the
results derived from the test. The comparison shows a clear difference between the
test-takers who passed and those who failed in terms of grammatical development. This
implies a correlation between grammatical development and communicative competence in
general which may indicate that PT constitutes a useful basis for oral assessment.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Processability hierarchy of Swedish
- 2.2Communicative Language Ability
- 2.3Aim of the study and research questions
- 3.Design of the study
- 3.1The oral test
- 3.2The test-takers
- 3.3Methodology
- 4.Results
- 5.Discussion of the results
- 6.Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References
Alderson, J. C.
(
1990)
Language testing in the 1990s: How far have we gone? How much further have
we to go? In
S. Anvian (Ed.),
Current developments in language testing (pp. 1–26). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

Alderson J. C.
(
2007)
The challenge of (diagnostic) testing: Do we know what we are
measuring? In
J. Fox,
M. Wesche,
D. Bayliss,
L. Cheng,
C. E. Turner &
C. Doe (Eds.),
What are we measuring? Language testing reconsidered (pp. 21–39). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.


Bachman, L. F.
(
1990)
Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S.
(
1996)
Language testing in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bachman, L. F., & Cohen, A. D.
(
1998)
Language testing – SLA interfaces: An update. In
L. F. Bachman &
A. D. Cohen (Eds.),
Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing
research (pp. 1–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bolander, M
(
1988)
Is there any order? On word order in Swedish learner
language.
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 9(1-2), 97–113.


Butler, C.
(
1985)
Statistics in linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.

Canale, M., & Swain, M.
(
1980)
Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching
and testing.
Applied Linguistics 1(1), 1–47.


Chapelle, C. A., Chung, Y.-R., Hegelheimer, V., Pendar, N. & Xu, J.
(
2010)
Towards a computer-delivered test of productive grammatical
ability.
Language Testing 27(4), 443–469.


Council of Europe
(
2001)
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching,
assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davies L., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T., & McNamara T.
(
1999)
Dictionary of language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and UCLES.

Eklund Heinonen, M.
(
2005)
Godkänd eller underkänd? Hur processbarhetsteorin kan tillämpas vid muntliga
språktester av andraspråksinlärare [Pass or fail? Processability theory applied in oral
tests of second language learners] (FUMS Report 215). Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Eklund Heinonen, M.
(
2009)
Processbarhet på prov. Bedömning av muntlig språkfärdighet hos vuxna
andraspråksinlärare [
Processability in tests. Assessment of oral proficiency in
adult second language learners]. Uppsala: Department of Scandinavian Languages, Uppsala University.

Ellis, R
(
2008)
Investigating grammatical difficulty in second language learning:
Implications for second language acquisition research and language testing.
International Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(1), 4–22.


Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A., & Lund, K.
(
2001)
Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(3), 389–416.


Granfeldt, J., & Ågren, M.
(
2014)
SLA developmental stages and teachers’ assessment of written French:
Exploring Direkt Profil as a diagnostic assessment tool.
Language Testing 31(3), 285–305.


Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A.
(
1991)
The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York, NY: Newbury House.

Hulstijn, J. H.
(
2015)
Discussion: How different can perspectives on L2 development
be? Language Learning 65(1), 210–232.


Hymes, D. H.
(
1972)
On communicative competence. In
J. B. Pride &
J. Holmes (Eds.),
Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

Håkansson, G., & Norrby, C.
(
2005)
Grammar and pragmatics. In
S. Foster-Cohen,
M. García-Mayo &
J. Cenoz (Eds.),
Eurosla Yearbook 5 (pp. 137–161). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Keßler, J.-U.
(
2007)
Assessing EFL-development online: A feasibility study of Rapid
profile. In
F. Mansouri (Ed.),
Second language acquisition research. Theory-construction and testing (pp. 119–143). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

Keßler, J.-U., & Liebner, M.
Levelt, W. J. M.
(
1989)
Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

McNamara, T
(
1990)
Item response theory and the validation of an ESP test for health
professionals.
Language Testing 7(1), 52–75.


McNamara, T
(
1996)
Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.

Pienemann, M
(
1984)
Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6(2), 186–214.


Pienemann, M., & Håkansson, G.
(
1999)
A unified approach towards the development of Swedish as L2: A
processability account.
Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21(3), 383–420.


Purpura, J. E.
(
2004)
Assessing grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Rahkonen, M., & Håkansson, G.
(
2008)
Production of written L2-Swedish – Processability or input
frequencies? In
J.-U. Keßler (Ed.),
Processability approaches to second language development (pp. 135–161). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.

Rimmer, W.
(
2006)
Measuring grammatical complexity: The Gordian knot.
Language Testing 23(4), 497–519.


Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Keßler, Jörg‐U. & Anke Lenzing
2022.
Grammar in Foreign and Second Language Classes. In
The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching,
► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.